CBT Versus a Return to Work Intervention for Patients With Common Mental Illness in Primary Care (CBT vs RTW I)

March 2, 2016 updated by: Erik Hedman, Karolinska Institutet

Cognitive Behavior Therapy Versus a Return to Work Intervention for Sick-listed Patients With Common Mental Illness in Primary Care: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Common mental illness, such as anxiety disorders and depression, is the main cause for sick leave in Sweden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in alleviating target symptoms of these disorders, but its effect on sick leave rates has not been sufficiently addressed. The investigators have developed an intervention called return to work (RTW), which is based in cognitive behavioral theory, that has a primary aim of helping sick-listed patients with common mental illness return to work. This new treatment has not been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of CBT and RTW for common mental illness in a randomized controlled trial conducted in primary care. Participants will be randomized to diagnosis specific CBT (n=70), RTW (n=70), or a combination of the two treatments (n=70). Main outcomes are days of sick leave and clinician severity rating of psychiatric symptoms. This study could contribute to new knowledge regarding how to best treat patients on sick leave with common mental illness.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

211

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 13440
        • Karolinska Institutet and Gustavsberg primary care center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have been on sick leave (at least 50%) for at least 1 month and not more than 6 months
  • Have an anxiety disorder diagnosis (obsessive compulsive disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, specific phobia), or/and major depression, or/and maladaptive stress reaction, or/and primary insomnia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A lower score than 4 on the Clinician severity rating scale
  • A higher score than 6 on the Clinician severity rating scale

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cognitive Behavior Therapy
As the trial will include several different common mental disorders, the cognitive behavior therapy used in the study will be based on the protocols with best empirical support. Cognitive behavior therapy entails psychoeducational components, i.e. the patient is learns about the disorder and how to view it from a cognitive behavioral perspective. The most important part of the treatment is systematic behavior changes often targeted at exposure to feared stimuli. This is combined with cognitive interventions targeted at challenging negative automatic thoughts. All treatments will be delivered by licensed psychologists.
Cognitive behavior therapy entails psychoeducational components, i.e. the patient is learns about the disorder and how to view it from a cognitive behavioral perspective. The most important part of the treatment is systematic behavior changes often targeted at exposure to feared stimuli. This is combined with cognitive interventions targeted at challenging negative automatic thoughts. All treatments will be delivered by licensed psychologists.
Experimental: Return to work
Participants randomized to this arm will receive an experimental treatment, based in cognitive behavioral therapy, with primary aim to help patients return to work. Interventions are aimed at solving work-related problems and comprises problem-solving training and systematic employer-patient meetings aimed at facilitating a gradual return to the workplace. Licensed psychologists deliver all treatments.
Participants randomized to this arm will receive an experimental treatment, based in cognitive behavioral therapy, with primary aim to help patients return to work. Interventions are aimed at solving work-related problems and comprises problem-solving training and systematic employer-patient meetings aimed at facilitating a gradual return to the workplace. Licensed psychologists deliver all treatments.
Experimental: CBT and Return to work
Participants randomized to this arm will receive a combination of cognitive behavior therapy and the return to work treatment. This arm is included in the study as the clinically most relevant therapy, would the return to work treatment be effective in reducing sick leave, is a treatment were patients are provided support to return to work but also is clinically effective in reducing psychiatric symptoms.
Cognitive behavior therapy entails psychoeducational components, i.e. the patient is learns about the disorder and how to view it from a cognitive behavioral perspective. The most important part of the treatment is systematic behavior changes often targeted at exposure to feared stimuli. This is combined with cognitive interventions targeted at challenging negative automatic thoughts. All treatments will be delivered by licensed psychologists.
Participants randomized to this arm will receive an experimental treatment, based in cognitive behavioral therapy, with primary aim to help patients return to work. Interventions are aimed at solving work-related problems and comprises problem-solving training and systematic employer-patient meetings aimed at facilitating a gradual return to the workplace. Licensed psychologists deliver all treatments.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sick leave
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of days on sick leave
1 year
Clinician Severity Rating (CSR)
Time Frame: Baseine, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in CSR at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up compared to baseline.
Baseine, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self-report (MADRS-S)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in MADRS-S at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Work ability index (WAI)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in WAI at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder, 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in ISI at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder, 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in HAI at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in PSS at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Trimbos and Institute of Technology Cost Questionnaire for Psychiatry (TIC-P)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in TIC-P at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in QOLI at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ5D)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 feel follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in EQ5D at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 feel follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Sheehan Disability Scales (SDS)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in SDS at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Self-rated health 5 (SRH-5)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in SRH-5 at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up and 52 week follow-up
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in OCI-R at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self-report (LSAS-SR)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in LSAS-SR at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Panic Disorder Severity Scale Self-rated (PDSS-SR)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in PDSS-SR at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Penn-State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in PSWQ at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale-Self report (PTSDSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in PTSDSS at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inflammatory cytokines
Time Frame: Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder)
Change in inflammatory cytokines at post-treatment
Baseline, post-treatment (variable depending on disorder)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety Disorders

Clinical Trials on Cognitive behavior therapy

Subscribe