Graded Activity Versus Supervised Exercises in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

June 13, 2014 updated by: Mauricio Oliveira Magalhães, University of Sao Paulo

EFFECT OF COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY AND EXERCISE VERSUS SUPERVISED EXERCISE PROGRAM IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PAIN LUMBAR NO SPECIFIC: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of graded activity program and supervised exercise on pain, functional disability, quality of life, global perceived effect, return to work, physical activity, physical capacity and strength of the lower limbs in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Objective: To contrast the efficacy of of graded activity program and supervised exercise on pain, functional disability, quality of life, global perceived effect, return to work, physical activity, physical capacity and strength of the lower limbs in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

Design: Sixty-six will be randomized into two groups namely: Graded Activity program (GA)(n = 33) and supervised exercise (SE) (n = 33). The primary clinical outcomes will be pain, assessed with the numerical pain scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire, and disability assessed with Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes will be measured with Global Perceived Effect, quality of life, return to work, physical activity, functional capacity and strength of the lower limbs. The program lasts for 6 weeks, and sessions happen twice a week, with duration of one hour each. Evaluations will be performed before(baseline), after (6weeks) and with a follow-up 3 and 6 months after treatment. Data will be collected by a blinded examiner who also had made the allocation of patients to groups. Significance level is established at 5%.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 01246903
        • Medicine School of the University Of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with non-specific chronic low back pain for at least three months, age between 18 and 65 year of both genders and with a minimum pain intensity score of three in the 11-point Pain Numerical Rating Scale (ranging from 0 to 10 points).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected serious spinal pathology (fractures, tumors, inflammatory or infective diseases of the spine);

    • Nerve root compromise;
    • Comorbid health conditions that would prevent active participation in the exercise programs;
    • Pregnancy;
    • Cardio Respiratory illnesses;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Graded Activity
Exercise treadmill, Strengthening of the lower limbs and trunk
The graded activity program to increase activity tolerance by performing individualized and submaximal exercises.
The group will perform stretching exercises (gluteus maximus, hamstrings, triceps surae, lumbar paraspinal), strengthening muscles (rectus abdominus, obliques and lower rectus abdominis internal and external) and motor control exercises (muscle transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Supervised exercises
Stretching, Strengthening, Motor Control
The graded activity program to increase activity tolerance by performing individualized and submaximal exercises.
The group will perform stretching exercises (gluteus maximus, hamstrings, triceps surae, lumbar paraspinal), strengthening muscles (rectus abdominus, obliques and lower rectus abdominis internal and external) and motor control exercises (muscle transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and McGill Pain Questionnaire
6 weeks
Functional Disability
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Short-Form Health Survey Questionnaire
6 weeks
Global Perceived Effect
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Global Perceived Effect Scale
6 weeks
Return to work
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Patients will be asked if returned their professional activities.
6 weeks
Habitual physical activity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Baecke questionnaire on habitual physical activity
6 weeks
Physical Capacity
Time Frame: 6 weeks
physical capacity tests (sit-to-stand and 50-foot walk)
6 weeks
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK)
self-applied questionnaire consisting of 17 items, which was developed to measure the fear of movement due to cLBP. Each question has 4 response options (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, and strongly agree) with scores respectively ranging from 1 to 4 points.
Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Amelia P Marques, PHD, University of Sao Paulo
  • Principal Investigator: Mauricio O Magalhaes, MSc, University of Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 1, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • mauriciomag20

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Graded Activity

Subscribe