Phacoemulsification and 25 Gauge (25G) Vitrectomy Versus Phacoemulsification Only in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membranes

January 16, 2013 updated by: Marco Dal Vecchio, University of Turin, Italy

Morphologic and Functional Results After Phacoemulsification and 25 Gauge Vitrectomy Versus Phacoemulsification Only in Eyes Affected by Idiopathic Epiretinal Membranes

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the difference in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity, oct retinal thickness and microperimetry in 2 groups of 30 eyes each affected by idiopathic epiretinal membranes that underwent phacoemulsification and 25G pars-plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (Group 1) versus phacoemulsification only (Group 2), with a follow-up length up to 5 years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Idiopathic epiretinal membranes represent a common cause of visual loss in elderly population. Vitrectomy with membrane peeling is nowadays considered the gold standard in the management of such pathology, with very good results either at short-time or at long-time follow up. In case of mild visual impairment due to epiretinal membrane and associated cataract, it is reasonable to treat only the lens pathology (with phacoemulsification and intra-ocular lens (IOL) implantation). In case of symptoms or ophthalmoscopic finding worsening it is always possible to submit patients who only underwent cataract surgery to vitrectomy with membrane peeling. There are, by now, no comparative studies between these two different approaches in medical literature.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Turin, Italy, 10100
        • Clinica Oculistica dell'Università, Ospedale Oftalmico

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic epiretinal membranes symptomatic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of ocular symptoms, previous retinal interventions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: idiopathic epiretinal membranes
Patients in first arm, with worse visual condition, treated with 25-G Vitrectomy and phacoemulsification (cataract intervention)
25-G vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane peeling and phacoemulsification (cataract intervention)
Active Comparator: idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Patient in second arm, with better pre-operative condition, treated with phacoemulsification (cataract intervention) only
lens extraction after phacoemulsification and intra-ocular artificial lens implantation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual acuity (using LogMar scale) changes from baseline to pre-defined periods after surgery
Time Frame: within 90,180,360,1360 days after surgery
We observed how did the visual acuity (using LogMar scale) increase after the two different surgical approaches described.
within 90,180,360,1360 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microperimetry parameters and average macular thickness changes
Time Frame: within 90,180,360,1360 days after surgery
We evaluated average sensitivity (SM) and local defect (DL) using microperimetry. We also evaluated the average macular thickness using optical coherence tomography technology.
within 90,180,360,1360 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marco Dal Vecchio, MD, Clinica Oculistica dell'Università, Ospedale Oftalmico Turin, Italy 10100
  • Study Chair: Antonio M. Fea, MD, PhD, Clinica Oculistica dell'Università, Ospedale Oftalmico Turin, Italy
  • Principal Investigator: Carlo A Lavia, MD, Clinica Oculistica dell'Università, Ospedale Oftalmico Turin, Italy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2006

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2013

Last Verified

January 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epiretinal Membrane

Clinical Trials on 25-G vitrectomy and phacoemulsification

3
Subscribe