- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01771939
Phacoemulsification and 25 Gauge (25G) Vitrectomy Versus Phacoemulsification Only in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membranes
January 16, 2013 updated by: Marco Dal Vecchio, University of Turin, Italy
Morphologic and Functional Results After Phacoemulsification and 25 Gauge Vitrectomy Versus Phacoemulsification Only in Eyes Affected by Idiopathic Epiretinal Membranes
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the difference in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity, oct retinal thickness and microperimetry in 2 groups of 30 eyes each affected by idiopathic epiretinal membranes that underwent phacoemulsification and 25G pars-plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling (Group 1) versus phacoemulsification only (Group 2), with a follow-up length up to 5 years.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Idiopathic epiretinal membranes represent a common cause of visual loss in elderly population.
Vitrectomy with membrane peeling is nowadays considered the gold standard in the management of such pathology, with very good results either at short-time or at long-time follow up.
In case of mild visual impairment due to epiretinal membrane and associated cataract, it is reasonable to treat only the lens pathology (with phacoemulsification and intra-ocular lens (IOL) implantation).
In case of symptoms or ophthalmoscopic finding worsening it is always possible to submit patients who only underwent cataract surgery to vitrectomy with membrane peeling.
There are, by now, no comparative studies between these two different approaches in medical literature.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Turin, Italy, 10100
- Clinica Oculistica dell'Università, Ospedale Oftalmico
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
No older than 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Idiopathic epiretinal membranes symptomatic
Exclusion Criteria:
- Absence of ocular symptoms, previous retinal interventions
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: idiopathic epiretinal membranes
Patients in first arm, with worse visual condition, treated with 25-G Vitrectomy and phacoemulsification (cataract intervention)
|
25-G vitrectomy with Internal Limiting Membrane peeling and phacoemulsification (cataract intervention)
|
Active Comparator: idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Patient in second arm, with better pre-operative condition, treated with phacoemulsification (cataract intervention) only
|
lens extraction after phacoemulsification and intra-ocular artificial lens implantation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Visual acuity (using LogMar scale) changes from baseline to pre-defined periods after surgery
Time Frame: within 90,180,360,1360 days after surgery
|
We observed how did the visual acuity (using LogMar scale) increase after the two different surgical approaches described.
|
within 90,180,360,1360 days after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Microperimetry parameters and average macular thickness changes
Time Frame: within 90,180,360,1360 days after surgery
|
We evaluated average sensitivity (SM) and local defect (DL) using microperimetry.
We also evaluated the average macular thickness using optical coherence tomography technology.
|
within 90,180,360,1360 days after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marco Dal Vecchio, MD, Clinica Oculistica dell'Università, Ospedale Oftalmico Turin, Italy 10100
- Study Chair: Antonio M. Fea, MD, PhD, Clinica Oculistica dell'Università, Ospedale Oftalmico Turin, Italy
- Principal Investigator: Carlo A Lavia, MD, Clinica Oculistica dell'Università, Ospedale Oftalmico Turin, Italy
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
October 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2006
Study Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 16, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
January 18, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 18, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 16, 2013
Last Verified
January 1, 2013
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- VTCMER2
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Epiretinal Membrane
-
Medical University of GrazCompletedEpiretinal Membrane of Both EyesAustria
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonTerminatedEpiretinal Membrane SurgeryFrance
-
University of RegensburgCompletedIdiopathic Epiretinal Membrane, CataractGermany
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonCompletedEpiretinal Membranes
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonRecruitingSurgery for Cataract | Surgery for and Idiopathic Epiretinal MembraneFrance
-
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular SurgeryCompleted
-
The Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Retinology and...Completed
-
Nantes University HospitalCompleted
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. MatteoCompleted
-
Changhua Christian HospitalCompletedEpiretinal Membrane | Internal Limiting Membrane WrinklingTaiwan
Clinical Trials on 25-G vitrectomy and phacoemulsification
-
Clinica Oculistica dell'Università di TorinoCompletedCataract Senile | Epiretinal Membrane
-
National Taiwan University HospitalCompleted
-
University of ManitobaCanola Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates Bio Solutions; Alberta Canola Producers...Completed
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedVitreous Hemorrhage | Retinal Detachment | Epiretinal Membrane | Vitrectomy | Macular HoleHong Kong
-
Peregrine Eye and Laser InstituteAlcon ResearchRecruitingVitreous Hemorrhage | Retinal Detachment | Epiretinal Membrane | Vitrectomy | Macular Holes | Dislocated Intraocular Lens Into Vitreous | Retained Lens FragmentsPhilippines
-
University of LeipzigCompleted
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreUnknownRhegmatogenous Retinal DetachmentCanada
-
University of FloridaADM/Matsutani LLCCompleted
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona; Catholic University of... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Oxford Brookes UniversityRoquette FreresCompletedHealthyUnited Kingdom