- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02733263
Resistant Maltodextrin Supplementation: Gastrointestinal Health (DEX)
Resistant Maltodextrin Supplementation and the Effect on Fecal Bifidobacteria, Bowel Function, Dietary Intake and Quality of Life
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After obtaining informed consent, participants will be randomized to either consume 0, 15 or 25 grams of resistant maltodextrin (RMD) during the first arm of the study. During the first intervention period, participants will consume the RMD everyday for 3 weeks. After a 2-week post intervention period, participants will be crossed to one of the other treatments for 3 weeks, followed by a 2-week post intervention and then receive the final intervention for 3 weeks.
Participants will complete daily questionnaires and weekly gastrointestinal symptom questionnaires during the intervention and post-intervention periods. Stool samples will be collected at the baseline and final time points of each intervention. Dietary intake will also be assessed weekly during each intervention period.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
- University of Florida
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 to <30 kg/m2
- Usual fiber intake of <19 g/d for males and 13 g/d for females based on Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) such as the NutritionQuest Fruit/Vegetable/Fiber Screener.
- Willing to complete daily and weekly questionnaires, 20 dietary recalls, and 15 stool collection days over approximately 18 weeks
- Willing to drink the study supplements for 3 weeks for each of the three intervention periods
- Willing to discontinue any prebiotic, fiber, or probiotic supplements or foods containing probiotics (e.g., yogurts with live, active cultures)
- Internet access for the duration of the protocol to complete online questionnaires
- On average you have 6 or more stools but fewer than 12
Exclusion Criteria:
- Does not meet above criteria
Dietary fiber intake greater than half the adequate intake (AI) based on Automated Self-Administered Diet History (ASA24) (http://riskfactor.cancer.gov/tools/instruments/asa24/) dietary intake data collected during run-in period:
- Females with a dietary fiber ≥13 g/d
- Males with a dietary fiber ≥19 g/d
- Antibiotic use within 2 months from providing the screening stool sample
- Physician-diagnosed gastrointestinal disease or condition (such as ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, gastroparesis, cancer, peptic ulcer disease, Celiac disease, short bowel disease, ileostomy, colostomy) other than Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), constipation, or diverticular disease
- Purposeful strenuous exercise of >300 minutes per week on average
- Women who are lactating or know they are pregnant
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group 1
Participants will first consume in the the order of 0 g RMD, 15 g RMD, 25 g RMD for 3 weeks each
|
15 grams of resistant maltodextrin
25 grams of resistant maltodextrin
0 grams of resistant maltodextrin
|
|
Experimental: Group 2
Participants will first consume RMD in the the order of 0 g RMD, 25 g RMD, 15 g RMD for 3 weeks each
|
15 grams of resistant maltodextrin
25 grams of resistant maltodextrin
0 grams of resistant maltodextrin
|
|
Experimental: Group 3
Participants will first consume RMD in the the order of 15 g RMD, 0 g RMD, 25 g RMD for 3 weeks each
|
15 grams of resistant maltodextrin
25 grams of resistant maltodextrin
0 grams of resistant maltodextrin
|
|
Experimental: Group 4
Participants will first consume RMD in the the order of 15 g RMD, 25 g RMD, 0 g RMD for 3 weeks each
|
15 grams of resistant maltodextrin
25 grams of resistant maltodextrin
0 grams of resistant maltodextrin
|
|
Experimental: Group 5
Participants will first consume RMD in the the order of 25 g RMD, 15 g RMD, 0 g RMD for 3 weeks each
|
15 grams of resistant maltodextrin
25 grams of resistant maltodextrin
0 grams of resistant maltodextrin
|
|
Experimental: Group 6
Participants will first consume RMD in the the order of 25 g RMD, 0 g RMD, 15 g RMD for 3 weeks each
|
15 grams of resistant maltodextrin
25 grams of resistant maltodextrin
0 grams of resistant maltodextrin
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fecal bifidobacteria counts
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Final (Week 3) of each intervention
|
The mean of the change between baseline and final time points in stool bifidobacteria counts [log(CFU)] was compared for each study arm.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Final (Week 3) of each intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fecal weight
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Final (Week 3) of each intervention
|
Average stool weight and consistency for each intervention
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Final (Week 3) of each intervention
|
|
Gastrointestinal Function as a measure of changes in average number of stools
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Final (Week 3) of each intervention
|
Changes in average number of stools per week were measured using a Daily Questionnaire.
Results were compared between treatment periods for each subject/group.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Final (Week 3) of each intervention
|
|
Immune Status by biomarker sIgA
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Final (Week 3) of each intervention
|
Marker or immune status Secretory Immunoglobulin A (sIgA) using sIgA ELISA
|
Baseline (Week 0) and Final (Week 3) of each intervention
|
|
Diet Quality
Time Frame: Week 3 of each intervention
|
Six dietary recalls occurred per study intervention, and each recall was scored for quality. The quality scores were averaged per arm and then compared between study arms for each subject/group using the Healthy Eating Index-2010.The Healthy Eating Index assesses diet quality based on 12 components, when summed has maximum points of 100 (HEI scale 0-100). High component scores indicate intakes close to the recommended ranges or amounts; low component scores indicate less compliance with the recommended ranges or amounts. |
Week 3 of each intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB201501168
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
University of Vermont Medical CenterAvocado Nutrition CenterRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Volunteer | Healthy Adult | Healthy Volunteers Only | Healthy Male and Female Subjects | Healthy Non-smokersUnited States
-
Dragonfly TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult Females | Volunteer | Healthy Adult MaleAustralia
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Participants | Static Stretching | Stretch | StretchingItaly
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Umm Al-Qura UniversityActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult | Healthy Women | Healthy Adult Females | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young Adults | Healthy Adult Female Participants | Healthy Adult Male | Poor Sleep Quality | Healthy (Controls) | Poor Sleeping Quality | Healthy Adult Male Subjects | Health Adult SubjectsSaudi Arabia
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young AdultsItaly
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
PfizerNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy AdultsUnited States
-
RAGE BioRecruitingHealthy | Healthy SmokerAustralia
Clinical Trials on 15 g RMD
-
Lia BallyUniversity of PadovaCompletedPost-bariatric Hypoglycaemia | Roux-en-Y Gastric BypassSwitzerland
-
BridorCompletedHealthy Obesity, MetabolicallyFrance
-
University of AarhusArla Foods; Mejeribrugets ForskningsFond; Innovation foundationCompletedProtein MetabolismDenmark
-
Swiss Federal Institute of TechnologyCompletedIron-deficiencySwitzerland
-
Gaia Herbs Inc.Appalachian College of PharmacyCompleted
-
Pennington Biomedical Research CenterCompleted
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedEnergy Intake | Appetite | Post-exercise | Negative Energy BalanceTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Isabelle Herter-AeberliBurgerstein VitamineCompletedIron-deficiencySwitzerland
-
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases...Completed
-
Mayo ClinicCompleted