TweeSteden Mild Stenosis Study (TWIST)

October 6, 2015 updated by: Paula M.C. Mommersteeg, Tilburg University

A Psycho-biochemical Perspective on Non-significant Coronary Artery Disease: a Prospective Cohort Study of Classic and Novel Risk Markers.

Psychosocial factors have been found to be associated with an increased risk for coronary artery disease incidence, progression and worse clinical outcomes.

Patients with non-significant coronary artery disease (confirmed vascular irregularities, but <60% coronary occlusion) often present with complaints such as chest pain, which warrant screening by coronary angiography (CAG) or computed tomography (CT scan). The prognosis of this group of patients with mild stenosis remains to be investigated in more detail, and we propose that psychosocial factors play a role in the clinical prognosis and patient reported outcomes in this group.

A special focus lies within examining personality characteristics, of which Type D personality is a primary predictor variable for prognosis. Type D personality is characterised by high negative affect and high social inhibition. In addition to psychosocial factors (personality, mood state, social support, SES), biomarkers(inflammation, clotting, DNA) as well as standard clinical risk factors (metabolic syndrome, activity level, smoking, medication use, disease severity) will be investigated.

The goal of the proposed study is to investigate a preexisting psycho-biochemical risk profile for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and patient perceived symptoms in a group with angiographically or CT-scan confirmed, non-significant coronary artery disease.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

547

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dr. Deelenlaan 5
      • Tilburg, Dr. Deelenlaan 5, Netherlands, 5042 AD
        • TweeSteden Hospital Tilburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who have received coronary angiography or computed tomography at the TweeSteden Hospital Tilburg are being screened since January 2009.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Based on quantitative coronary angiography (CAG): visible, but non-significant (<60% coronary occlusion) vascular irregularities and mild coronary stenosis.
  • Based on 64-slice CT-scan (CT-scan): detected non-significant stenosis (calcium score >= lowest 10th percentile), and not eligible for CAG.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Normal coronary arteries (based on CAG or CT scan)
  • Significant occlusion of coronary arteries (>=60% stenosis)
  • Eligible for coronary intervention such as PCI or CABG
  • History of coronary events (being either MI,PCI, CABG, heart failure)
  • For the CT-screened group: eligible for CAG based on the CT-scan
  • Serious comorbid conditions such as chronic kidney failure, or receiving chemotherapy
  • Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
CAG and CT group
CAG group = patients included based on coronary angiography screening; CT group = patients included based on computed tomography screening

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Time Frame: Average 42 months (Range 12-72; at least 12 months after inclusion final participant)
MACE includes the occurence of a recurrent coronary angiography, emergency hospitalization (for cardiac reasons), myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), mortality (cardiac/noncardiac)
Average 42 months (Range 12-72; at least 12 months after inclusion final participant)
Patient Perceived Health Status
Time Frame: 12 and 24 months
patient perceived health status includes self-reported chest pain, disease specific health status, generic health status, fatigue and mood (depression/anxiety). Double time point was included for this outcome measure to examine changes over time, compared to baseline.
12 and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychosocial factors
Time Frame: baseline, 12 and 24 months

The secondary aim is to investigate the correlation and the stability over time between psychosocial factors, biochemical variables, traditional cardiac risk factors and measures of outcome.

Psychosocial factors include questionnaires as personality scales (Type D personality, Cook-Medley Hostility scale 27 item version), depression (HADS-D at each time point, BDI, CESD-10 and PHQ9 at consecutive time points), anxiety (HADS-A at each time point), fatigue (FAS), global mood scale (Positive and negative affect), generic health status (Short Form 12), specific health status (Seattle Angina Questionnaire). Indicators of education level, marital status, lifestyle factors, and activity level.

baseline, 12 and 24 months
Biochemical correlates
Time Frame: baseline, 12 and 24 months

Examine biochemical correlates in relation to psychosocial and traditional cardiac risk factors.

Standard assessment is done for high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP), fibrinogen, leukocyte count and differentiation, and registration of lipid profile, glucose, creatinin at baseline. Baseline and 12 month serum samples are collected and stored at -80, as well as DNA samples for future funding opportunities.

baseline, 12 and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paula M.C. Mommersteeg, PhD, Tilburg University
  • Principal Investigator: Jos W. Widdershoven, MD PhD, The Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital
  • Study Chair: Wilbert Aarnoudse, MD PhD, The Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital
  • Study Chair: Johan Denollet, PhD, Tilburg University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2015

Last Verified

October 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Subscribe