Comparison of Palonosetron and Ramosetron for Preventing Patient-controlled Analgesia Related Nausea and Vomiting Following Spine Surgery

February 17, 2014 updated by: Yonsei University

Postoperative pain, the great concern for the patients undergoing spine surgery, has led to common use of opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) postoperatively. Opioid-based IV-PCA offers better pain control, which could facilitate early recovery, rehabilitation and increase patient satisfaction. However, its use inevitably increases the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), another great discomfort, as high as 80% in patients with multiple risk factors.Therefore, there have been consistent efforts to prevent PONV with multimodal therapies such as risk stratification, modification and preventive use of antiemetics.

Of all antiemetics, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonist, especially ondansetron, is most commonly used and extensively studied to reduce PONV because of its efficacy and fewer side effects.[8] However, its efficacy is not quite satisfactory when it comes to PONV associated with opioid-based IV-PCA. Recently, there are many reports comparing the antiemetic efficacy between ondansetron and the 2 newly developed 5-HT3 antagonists, ramosetron and palonosetron. Ramosetron is known to have a higher affinity and longer duration of binding to 5-HT3 receptor, therefore exhibits potent and sustained anti-emetic effect than previously developed 5-HT3 antagonists.Palonosetron has a unique allosteric binding to the 5-HT3 receptor, which brings a higher affinity, longer duration of action and longer elimination half-time.According to the previous studies, both ramosetron and palonosetron showed superior antiemetic efficacy for PONV associated with opioid-based IV-PCA to ondansetron as expected by their theoretical advantages. However, it has never been evaluated which one has superior antiemetic efficacy for opioid-based IV-PCA associated PONV. Therefore, in this study, we tried to evaluate the relative antiemetic efficacy of ramosetron and palonosetron in controlling opioid-based IV-PCA related PONV.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

196

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients (20-65 years) scheduled for lumbar spinal surgery in prone position between August 2011 and July 2012.
  2. All patients were using opioid-based IV-PCA postoperatively for pain control

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. gastrointestinal disease
  2. renal dysfunction
  3. hepatic dysfunction
  4. diabetes mellitus on insulin
  5. pregnancy
  6. use of steroid, opioid, antiemetics within 1 day before surgery
  7. inability to understand verbal rating scale (VRS)
  8. inability to use PCA device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ramosetron
Ramosetron 0.3 mg was mixed to the PCA. Same dose of drug was administered 10 minutes before the end of surgery according to the allocated group.
Active Comparator: palonosetron
palonosetrno 0.075 mg was mixed to the PCA. Same dose of drug was administered 10 minutes before the end of surgery according to the allocated group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
verbal numeric scale
Time Frame: change of antiemetic efficacy for 5 time points ( postanesthesia care unit, 0-6 h, 6-24 h, 24-48 h, 48-72 h after operation)
At each time point, frequency and intensity (verbal numeric scale, 0-10, 0: no nausea, 10: maximum) of nausea, frequency of vomiting, rescue antiemetic use were recorded and compared between groups.
change of antiemetic efficacy for 5 time points ( postanesthesia care unit, 0-6 h, 6-24 h, 24-48 h, 48-72 h after operation)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Clinical Trials on ramosetron

3
Subscribe