Incentives for Participation Versus Outcomes

April 14, 2025 updated by: University of Rhode Island

Incentives for Participation Versus Outcomes for Population Cessation of Smoking

One of the most important debates in the field of disease prevention is whether financial incentives should be contingent on participation in evidence-based programs for smoking cessation or on actual outcomes, like prolonged abstinence. This study can fill a major knowledge gap in this debate, which is the lack of any population trial that compared the impacts of outcomes- and participation-based incentives in a population of smokers. This research can help policy makers and health service providers choose the incentives approach that provides the most effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and cost-savings for entire populations of smokers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This population-based randomized clinical trial is designed to compare long-term abstinence rates in three groups of smokers: 1. Those incentivized for participation in an evidence-based treatment designed for smokers at each stage of change; 2. Those incentivized for biologically validated prolonged abstinence at 6 and 12 months who could also choose to participate in the TTM (Transtheoretical Model)-tailored intervention; and 3. An assessment only control condition.

The Specific Aims are:

  1. To assess whether the treatment group incentivized for participation outperforms the control group at 12, 24 and 36 months as hypothesized;
  2. To assess whether the treatment group incentivized for prolonged abstinence at 6 and 12 months outperforms the control group at each follow-up as hypothesized;
  3. To assess whether the treatment group incentivized for participation outperforms the treatment group incentivized for outcomes at 36 months as hypothesized.
  4. To compare the cost-effectiveness of each treatment in a population of mostly unmotivated smokers;

The Secondary Aims are:

  1. To assess the long-term treatment trajectories of each treatment compared to controls with hypothesized increasing trajectory in the participation contingent incentives and decreasing trajectory in the outcome contingent incentives.
  2. To identify mediators of long-term outcomes in each treatment, such as amount of treatment participation, income, severity of smoking, stage of change, self-efficacy, perceived health and intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to quit.
  3. To compare cost-savings of each treatment by modeling all additional costs of smoking for employers and smokers.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhode Island
      • Kingston, Rhode Island, United States, 02881
        • University of Rhode Island

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • smoker

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants will be incentivized for assessments only
Experimental: Incentives for Participation
Participants will be incentivized for each assessment and for each smoking cessation session they complete
Participants will receive three smoking cessation programs
Experimental: Incentives for Cessation
Participants will be incentivized for each assessment and biochemically confirmed abstinence at 12 and 24 months
Participants will have access to a smoking cessation program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Smoking abstinence
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James O Prochaska, Ph.D., University of Rhode Island

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

April 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DA034041

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Smoking

Clinical Trials on Incentives for Participation

Subscribe