NT0102 in the Treatment of Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

December 18, 2017 updated by: Neos Therapeutics, Inc

A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study of NT0102 in Children (Ages 6 12 Years) With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, Phase 3 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NT0102 in the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in pediatric patients 6 to 12 years of age in a laboratory classroom study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

87

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34208
        • Florida Clinical Research Center
      • Maitland, Florida, United States, 32751
        • Florida Clinical Research Center
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89128
        • Center For Psychiatry And Behavioral Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Currently being treated for ADHD

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other psychiatric diagnoses
  • Significant cognitive impairment
  • Chronic medical illnesses
  • Structural cardiac defects
  • Significant abnormal lab tests
  • Taking disallowed medications
  • Positive drug test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NT0102
After the screening/washout period, all participants will receive study drug NT0102 once daily for 4 weeks during the dose optimization period. After completion of the dose optimization period, the optimized dose of the study drug will be selected, and participants will stay on that dose for 1 week (dose stabilization period). At the end of this period, participants will be randomized to a treatment. Participants in this arm will be given 20-60 mg of NT0102 as oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) once daily for one week during the double-blind treatment period.
NT0102 (methylphenidate polistirex [MPP] extended release [XR] ODT) was given once daily at a dose equivalent to 20-60 mg methylphenidate hydrochloride.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
After the screening/washout period, all participants will receive study drug NT0102 once daily for 4 weeks during the dose optimization period. After completion of the dose optimization period, the optimized dose of the study drug will be selected, and participants will stay on that dose for 1 week (dose stabilization period). At the end of this period, participants will be randomized to a treatment. Participants in this arm will be given placebo as matching ODT once daily for one week during the double-blind treatment period.
Matching ODT placebo was given once daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Score
Time Frame: Visit 8 (Day 42)
The primary efficacy endpoint was derived from the SKAMP-Combined score calculated as the total score of all 13 items of the SKAMP-Combined score. The SKAMP-Combined score was obtained by summing up each item score where each item is rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment) for a total possible score of 0 to 78. A lower score indicates less symptomatology (i.e., is better). The SKAMP was a rating scale that specifically measures the classroom manifestations of ADHD. The SKAMP ratings were completed for all subjects at baseline (pre-dose) and at 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, and 13 hours post-dose on the classroom testing day (Visit 8). The primary analysis time point for the primary efficacy endpoint was the average of all post-dose SKAMP scores during the 13-hour period.
Visit 8 (Day 42)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Onset of Effect
Time Frame: Visit 8 (Day 42) at 1 hour (h), 3 h, 5 h, 7 h, 10 h, 12 h and 13 h
Onset of effect was defined as the first time point at which NT0102 separates from placebo on SKAMP-Combined scores. A separation was defined as a statistically significant difference at the 5% level of active drug over placebo. Data was collected separately for NT0102 and Placebo arms and is reported as a comparison analysis of the two arms. This assessment was collected on the full classroom day, Visit 8.
Visit 8 (Day 42) at 1 hour (h), 3 h, 5 h, 7 h, 10 h, 12 h and 13 h
Duration of Effect
Time Frame: Visit 8 (Day 42) at 1 hour (h), 3 h, 5 h, 7 h, 10 h, 12 h and 13 h
Duration of effect was defined as the last time point at which NT0102 separates from placebo on SKAMP-Combined scores. A separation was defined as a statistically significant difference at the 5% level of active drug over placebo. Data was collected separately for NT0102 and Placebo arms, and is reported as a comparison analysis of the two arms. This assessment was collected on the full classroom day, Visit 8.
Visit 8 (Day 42) at 1 hour (h), 3 h, 5 h, 7 h, 10 h, 12 h and 13 h
The Average of the SKAMP-Attention Scores
Time Frame: Visit 8 (Day 42)
The SKAMP Rating Scale was comprised of 2 behavioral subscales, including the "Attention" subscale (4 items). The SKAMP-Attention subscore evaluates concentration in the classroom and is obtained by summing up each item score where each item is rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment) for total possible combined score of 0 to 24. A lower score indicates less symptomatology (i.e. is better). The SKAMP-Attention subscores were derived from 20 minutes of direct observations of participant behavior. Ratings were based on the frequency and quality of behaviors.
Visit 8 (Day 42)
The Average of the SKAMP-Deportment Scores
Time Frame: Visit 8 (Day 42)
The SKAMP Rating Scale is comprised of 2 behavioural subscales, including the "Deportment" subscale (4 items). The SKAMP-Deportment subscore evaluates behaviour in the classroom and is obtained by summing up each item score where each item is rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment) for total possible combined score of 0 to 24. A lower score indicates less symptomatology (i.e. is better). The SKAMP-Attention subscores were derived from 20 minutes of direct observations of participant behaviour. Ratings were based on the frequency and quality of behaviours.
Visit 8 (Day 42)
The Average of the Permanent Product Measure of Performance - Attempted (PERMP-A) Score
Time Frame: Visit 8 (Day 42)
The PERMP consisted of 400 math problems and was graded as number of problems "Attempted" (PERMP-A) and number of problems "Correct." (PERMP-C). It was an objective measure of performance during the classroom testing day.
Visit 8 (Day 42)
The Average of the Permanent Product Measure of Performance - Correct (PERMP-C) Score
Time Frame: Visit 8 (Day 42)
The PERMP consisted of 400 math problems and was graded as number of problems "Attempted" (PERMP-A) and number of problems "Correct." (PERMP-C). It was an objective measure of performance during the classroom testing day.
Visit 8 (Day 42)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Visit 9 (Day 43)
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Visit 9 (Day 43)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Carolyn Sikes, PhD, Neos Tx

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 17, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Subscribe