Impact of Probiotics BIFILACT® on Diarrhea in Patients Treated With Pelvic Radiation

May 16, 2013 updated by: Mimi Demers, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
In this double-blinded randomized clinical trial study, investigators assessed probiotic used to prevent or delay radiation induced grade moderate to severe diarrhea with patient treated for pelvic cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study was prospective, unicentric, controlled with comparison to a placebo, randomised and double-blinded. Patients were stratified into three groups: prostatic cancers, gynecologic cancers without chemotherapy and gynecologic or rectal cancers with chemotherapy.

Patients were block-randomized by the research nurse and received a standard dose of Bifilact® probiotics or placebo according to the random list generated by blocks of 2, 4, or 6 patients according to random permutations. A preliminary internal pilot study was performed when the half of the expected sample size were recruited. The goal of this analysis was to test assumptions that lead to chosen sample sizes (N0) and thus, validate the feasibility of the study. Following preliminary results, the sample size re-calculated at the interim analysis is similar to that originally intended. It would be advisable to continue the recruitment as planned. No adjustment to the critical level of the test would be required in analyzes carried out at the end of study. However, another random block using higher probiotics dosage to the randomization was added with preservation of double bind. New random list were generated for each strata with a 3:1:1 ratio (higher dose, standard dose, placebo) to compensate for the starting of the latest higher dose group. All the bottles had a similar aspect, they were all identified by the commercial brand Bifilact. Also the group, either A, B or C, was circled on that bottle, depending on if that bottle belong to the placebo group, standard dose group, or high dose group. Only the nurse knew the coding system, it was also her who would assign the patient to a group, according to the randomization list. She would also hand out the bottle to the patient every week. The two registered dietician, caregivers, were totally excluded of this processes (preliminary study and randomisation) to preserve the double blind.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

246

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Quebec city, Quebec, Canada, G1R 2J6
        • CHU de Québec, radio-oncology departement

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • They had a pelvic cancer: gynecologic, rectal, or prostatic,they were to receive radiotherapy treatments for a minimum of 40 Gy at the pelvic level , with or without chemotherapy and they had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • they had previous radiotherapy treatments in the pelvic or abdominal region, medical history of gastro-intestinal inflammation, malabsorption syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease or coeliac disease, ileostomy, daily use of anti-diarrheal medication before radiotherapy, pregnancy or breastfeeding, neutropenia or probiotics intolerance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bifilact® probiotics standard dose
concentration of 1.3 billion of Lactobacillus acidophilus LAC-361 and Bifidobacterium longum BB-536. one pill twice a day. Each capsule contained maltodextrin and magnesium stearate as excipient
placebo, standard dose 1.3 billion twice a day, high dose 10 billion three time a day
Other Names:
  • probiotics
Active Comparator: Bifilact® probiotics high dose
containing 10 billion Lactobacillus acidophilus LAC-361 and Bifidobacterium longum BB-536. One pill three times a day. Each capsule contained maltodextrin and magnesium stearate as excipient
placebo, standard dose 1.3 billion twice a day, high dose 10 billion three time a day
Other Names:
  • probiotics
Placebo Comparator: placebo
Each capsule contained maltodextrin and magnesium stearate as excipient. One pill twice a day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
testing the efficacy of probiotics Bifilact®, in comparison to a placebo to assess its ability to prevent or delay the incidence of moderate or severe symptoms of diarrhea during the period of treatment by radiotherapy
Time Frame: day 1-60
Patients were asked to note in a daily logbook whether they experienced digestive problems such as daily bowel movements. Severity of the diarrhea was evaluated according to toxicity criteria of the WHO: grade 1 = increase of 2-3 stools per day compared to pre-treatment, grade 2 = increase of 4-6 bowel stools per day or nocturnal stools, grade 3 = increase of 7-9 stools per day or incontinence, grade 4 = increase of 10 or more stools, need for IV hydration. The Registered Dietitian assessed symptoms in logbook with the patient once a week.The duration of daily logbook was 4-9 weeks depending of the total dose of external radiotherapy
day 1-60

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary objectives were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® lowered the interruption of radiotherapy treatments or doses of both radiotherapy or chemotherapy
Time Frame: week 1-9
Registered Dietitian assessed respect of the preview protocol treatment each week (radiotherapy and chemotherapy) if not respected: diarrhea is it involved. For patients that received chemotherapy, a weekly blood profile was obtained and study pills were discontinued if neutrophil count became ≤1.5 X 10(9)/L.
week 1-9
Secondary objective were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® decreased or delayed the consumption of anti-diarrheal medication
Time Frame: day 1-60
Patients were asked to note, each day during the treatment,in a daily logbook intake of anti-diarrheal medication, laxatives, and antibiotics. The Registered Dietitian assessed symptoms noted with the patient each week.The duration of daily logbook was 4-9 weeks depending of the total dose of external radiotherapy
day 1-60
Secondary objectives were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® reduced abdominal pain
Time Frame: day 1-60
Abdominal pain was evaluated according to the NCI scale version 3.0: Grade 1 = mild pain, not interfering with function, grade 2 = moderate pain: pain or analgesics interfering with function, but not interfering with activity of daily living, grade 3 =: severe pain: pain or analgesics severely interfering with activity of daily living. The Registered Dietitian assessed information with the patient each week
day 1-60
Secondary objectives were to assess whether the overall well-being of patients was improved during treatment.
Time Frame: week 0, 4-9, 6-11
Quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) assessment was filled three times during the study: once at the outset, once at the end, and then again two weeks after the last radiotherapy treatment.
week 0, 4-9, 6-11
Secondary objectives were to assess whether intake of Bifilact® decreased need for hospitalization
Time Frame: week 1-9
Registered Dietitian assessed each week if the patient had need hospitalization and if the diarrhea has involved
week 1-9

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dagnault Anne, PhD, CHU de Québec
  • Principal Investigator: Josee Desjardins, B.Sc, RD, CHU de Québec
  • Principal Investigator: Mimi Demers, B.Sc. RD, CHU de Québec

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 17, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe