Comparative Effectiveness of Stress Tests (EXACT-COST)

August 26, 2019 updated by: Karolina Zareba, Ohio State University

EXACT-COST: Exercise CMR's Accuracy for Cardiovascular Stress Testing-Comparative Effectiveness of Stress Tests

The primary objective of this project is to demonstrate that a new approach to cardiac stress imaging that combines treadmill exercise with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) provides valuable clinical information in a cost-effective manner.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Womens Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45219
        • The Lindner Center at The Christ Hospital
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • The Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • any patient referred for stress SPECT
  • known or suspected ischemic heart disease
  • ability to perform adequate treadmill stress

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any contraindication to MRI (e.g. ferromagnetic foreign body, cerebral aneurysm clip, pacemaker/ICD, severe claustrophobia)
  • renal insufficiency (GFR < 40)
  • known allergy to gadolinium-based contrast or iodinated contrast (because of the research CTA in patients not referred for cath after 2 weeks)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total patient direct and indirect medical costs for one year following stress testing will be less for patients undergoing stress CMR as compared to patients undergoing stress Nuclear.
Time Frame: baseline
Patients will undergo either Stress CMR or stress Nuclear testing. For each individual patient, the cost of the initial test, the subsequent follow-up costs, and the total costs over the follow-up period will be calculated. Total costs will be collected for direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs. Direct medical costs will include those applied for medications, imaging, invasive therapies and healthcare services; as well as costs resulting from side effects or complications from each of the testing strategies. Direct non-medical costs will include those incurred due to CAD-related illness or the need to seek care, such as caregiver costs and patient transportation costs. Indirect costs, will be defined as lost productivity due to time lost from work, early death or disability.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Dickerson, MD, Ohio State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic Cardiac Imaging

Subscribe