The Addition of Non-Invasive Ventilation To Airway Clearance Techniques In Adults With Cystic Fibrosis (NIV)

Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) For Positive Pressure Support. A Randomised Cross-Over Trial To Evaluate The Short-Term Effects of NIV As An Adjunct To Airway Clearance Techniques in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis.

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder of altered ion transport across cell membranes which is characterised by the production of thickened bodily secretions, affecting the function of organs such as the pancreas and the lungs. Within the lungs, thickened sputum is very difficult to clear, which can results in recurrent chest infections, which can lead to lung damage. therefore it is important to optimise the removal of sputum to try and prevent these complications. Traditionally, a variety of approaches are usually combined including inhaled medications to thin or hydrate secretions, and chest physiotherapy to mobilise secretions and improve sputum clearance.

There are many chest physiotherapy or airway clearance techniques (ACT) available including breathing methods such as the Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) or Autogenic Drainage (AD) and adjuncts such as Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP), High Frequency Chest Oscillation (the "Vest"), or oscillatory devices such as the Flutter or Acapella. When people with CF have an infection or have severe disease often the effectiveness of ACTs can decrease due to fatigue, shortness of breath or having an overwhelming amount of sputum. At this time it is necessary to re-assess ACTs and the addition of positive pressure to airway clearance techniques has been shown to be helpful in decreasing fatigue during chest physiotherapy.

At present no research studies have reported an increase in sputum cleared with the addition of positive pressure, however it is thought that the ability to take a deeper breath when using positive pressure would help to improve sputum clearance. With clinical experience of the use of NIV with adult CF patients, the investigators aim to explore this objectively in this study.

Research Question:

Does the addition of non-invasive ventilation (Breas, I-Sleep 25) as supplementary positive pressure to normal airway clearance techniques improve sputum clearance in stable adult patients with cystic fibrosis?

Hypothesis

The inclusion of non-invasive ventilation in addition to a patient's normal airway clearance technique will lead to improvements in subjective ease of clearance and work of breathing during airway clearance and objectively increase sputum clearance, as well as being well tolerated in patients as an adjunct to airway clearance.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder of altered ion transport across cell membranes which is characterised by the production of thickened bodily secretions, affecting the function of organs such as the pancreas and the lungs. Within the lungs, thickened mucus alters normal mucocillary clearance mechanisms resulting in airway obstruction, mucus plugging and recurrent infections. The cycle of recurrent infections and subsequent inflammation is thought to be the major mechanism towards damage to lung tissue and the occurrence of fibrosis, which decreases lung function, lowers tissue oxygenation and eventually leads to respiratory failure and death. Optimisation of the removal of airway secretions is therefore an integral part of the management of CF in order to try and prevent these complications. Traditionally, a variety of approaches are usually combined including mucolytic or hydrator therapy to make the secretions less viscous, and chest physiotherapy to mobilise secretions and improve airway clearance.

There are many chest physiotherapy or airway clearance techniques (ACT) available including breathing methods such as the Active Cycle of Breathing Techniques (ACBT) or Autogenic Drainage (AD) and adjuncts such as Positive Expiratory Pressure (PEP), High Frequency Chest Oscillation (the "Vest"), or oscillatory devices such as the Flutter or Acapella. Research has shown there to be no difference in effectiveness between techniques, as long as they are performed correctly and regularly, and therefore choice of ACT depends upon assessment of the patient by a trained physiotherapist and discussions with the individual. With advancing disease or infections, often the effectiveness of ACTs can decrease due to patient fatigue, shortness of breath or overwhelming amount of secretions. At this time it is necessary to re-assess ACTs, and the addition of positive pressure to airway clearance techniques has been shown to decrease patient fatigue and respiratory rates during clearance. One of these studies also demonstrated improvements in oxygenation and respiratory muscle strength after the use of positive pressure with ACT. While no studies have reported an increase in sputum expectorated with the addition of positive pressure, the ability to augment greater tidal volumes through positive pressure is thought to be a mechanism which could improve sputum clearance. Clinical experience at the Royal Brompton hospital has indicated that with alterations in pressure and flow rates from resting settings, sputum clearance appears to be easier and more effective; the investigators aim to explore this observation objectively in this study.

Research Question:

Does the addition of non-invasive ventilation (Breas, I-Sleep 25) as supplementary positive pressure to normal airway clearance techniques improve sputum clearance in stable adult patients with cystic fibrosis?

Hypothesis

The inclusion of non-invasive ventilation in addition to a patient's normal airway clearance technique will lead to improvements in subjective ease of clearance and work of breathing during airway clearance and objectively increase sputum clearance, as well as being well tolerated in patients as an adjunct to airway clearance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Greater London
      • London, Greater London, United Kingdom, SW3 6NP
        • The Royal Brompton Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (confirmed by genotype or a sweat sodium concentration of >70mmol/l or sweat chloride of >60mmol/l)
  • Sixteen years of age or over
  • Patients admitted to the Royal Brompton Hospital with a pulmonary exacerbation of which is resolving. Patients will be considered for inclusion from day 7 of treatment to 3 days prior to discharge (as determined by a member of the cystic fibrosis medical team and have spirometric values within 20% of the mean of the last two stable recordings (at least 1 month apart)
  • Patients with an established airway clearance regime that they have used for 3 months or more

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current moderate haemoptysis (greater than streaking in the sputum)
  • Current pneumothorax or history of pneumothorax in the 3 months prior to consideration for the study
  • Current dependency on positive pressure support with airway clearance via the IPPB (Intermittent Positive Pressure Breathing) machine or NIV
  • Previous history of spontaneous rib fractures
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to give consent for treatment or measurement
  • Current participation in another study
  • If the patient requires more than 2 airway clearance sessions a day

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Normal airway clearance
The patients usual airway clearance technique
Experimental: Non-Invasive Ventilation
The addition of positive pressure via a non-invasive ventilator to the participants usual airway clearance technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sputum weight (wet) expectorated during, up to 30 minutes after treatment and the 24 hour total weight
Time Frame: 24 hours
The amount of sputum expectorated by the patient both up to 30 minutes after treatment, and the total amount cleared in 24 hours after each treatment
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative assessment using 10 centimetre Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of ease of clearance, work of breathing during clearance and satisfaction of each treatment approach (A or B).
Time Frame: Within 5 minutes immediately after each treatment
Within 5 minutes immediately after each treatment
Lung function tests
Time Frame: 5 minutes before treatment, within 5 minutes immediately after treatment and 30 minutes after treatment
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Forced Expiratory Flow at 25% of FVC (FEF25) Forced Expiratory Flow at 75% of FVC (FEF75)
5 minutes before treatment, within 5 minutes immediately after treatment and 30 minutes after treatment
Oxygen saturations during the treatment session
Time Frame: During the treatment
Measurements of oxygen saturations via finger probe pulse oximetry
During the treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Final Evaluation Questionnaire
Time Frame: At the end of each participants study period. These will be completed up to 30 minutes after the final treatment on the final day of the research study.
A questionnaire designed to look at patient opinion and preferences for treatment methods studied
At the end of each participants study period. These will be completed up to 30 minutes after the final treatment on the final day of the research study.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gemma Stanford, BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy, The Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 25, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cystic Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Airway Clearance Techniques

Subscribe