Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Corticosteroid Injection as Treatment for Degenerative Pathology of the Temporomandibular Joint

March 10, 2015 updated by: Kaiser Permanente

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid Injection as Treatment for Degenerative Pathology of the Temporomandibular Joint

1.0 BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESES

1.1 Osteoarthritis is a continuous and entirely physiologic adaptive process that occurs in every joint. These include the replication of cells that produce matrix, enzymes, protease inhibitors, cytokines, and other peptides. Along with the synthesis of new tissue there is a release of breakdown products into the synovial fluid. Enzymes and phagocytes are required to clear these breakdown products. Normal tissue turnover involves synthesis and breakdown in well-regulated balance. In the degenerative state this balance is upset producing inflammation-derived alterations to the synovium, cartilage, capsule, tendons, and bone. Common causes of such alterations include increased loading, physical stress, and traumatic injury to the joint.

1.2 The rationale for the use of corticosteroids in temporomandibular joint therapy is that they inhibit prostaglandin synthesis and decrease the activity of collagenase and other enzymes that degrade the articular cartilage. Platelet rich plasma is a novel therapeutic agent that has several potential advantages over corticosteroids for the treatment of degenerative pathology of the temporomandibular joint. Platelet rich plasma has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and anti-bacterial properties. It also restores intra-articular hyaluronic acid, increases glycosaminoglycan condrocyte synthesis, balances joint angiogenesis, and provides a scaffold for stem cell migration. Autologous platelet rich plasma injections for treatment of knee cartilage degenerative lesions and osteoarthritis have shown longer efficacy than hyaluronic acid injections in reducing pain and recovering articular function. Similarly, platelet rich plasma has shown to have better outcomes than corticosteroid injections in the management of lateral epicondylitis, and better outcomes than hyaluronic acid injections in the management of osteochondral lesions of the talus.

1.3 Current treatments for degeneration and osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint are focused primarily on palliation by reducing inflammation and inflammatory mediators. This study seeks to validate a therapeutic agent that has the potential to actively prevent the progression of degeneration in addition to reducing pain and inflammation

Study Overview

Detailed Description

2.0 OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE

2.1 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, in terms of pain relief and improvement in function, of intra-articular injections with platelet rich plasma versus the current standard which is corticosteroid injections into the temporomandibular joint.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: The following diagnostic criteria for patient selection are to be used:

  • Patients will need to have a history of chronic pain (at least 3 months) refractory to conservative therapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, muscle relaxants, diet modifications and splint therapy
  • Patients will also need to have imaging findings (radiography or magnetic resonance imaging) that show mild to severe degenerative changes of the temporomandibular joint

Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria will include

  • Patients with systemic disorders such as rheumatic diseases, hematologic diseases, active infections, immunosuppression
  • Patients receiving therapy with anticoagulants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A (corticosteroid injection group)
Group A will receive one intra-articular injection of 2 ml of solution containing 1ml of 10mg/ml Triamcinolone suspended in 1 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine solution per affected joint
Experimental: Group B (platelet rich plasma injection)
Group B will receive a 2 ml intra-articular injection of a platelet rich plasma preparation per affected joint

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain relief
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Changes in pain relief will be evaluated at 1, 3, and six month intervals using the Pain resource centers TMJ scale.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in function
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The patients improvement in function will be evaluated at 1,3, and 6 months for improvement using the pain resource centers TMJ scale.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Husam G Elias, MD, DMD, Kaiser Permanente
  • Study Chair: Julian J Wilson, DDS, Kaiser Permanente

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2015

Last Verified

March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Joint Disease

Clinical Trials on Group A (corticosteroid injection group)

3
Subscribe