Comparison of a Water-soluble Topical Antimicrobial to Silver Sulfadiazine in Partial Thickness Burns

August 20, 2013 updated by: University of Virginia

A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Silver Sulfadiazine Cream to a Water-Soluble Poly-Antimicrobial Gel in Partial Thickness Burn Wounds

Partial thickness burns are a common, painful injury requiring a great deal of resources in their care. Silver sulfadizine is a commonly-used topical antimicrobial, but is difficult to remove due to its lipid base. We are comparing a water-based topical antimicrobial therapy to silver sulfadiazine and hypothesize that the water-based therapy is superior in terms of pain control and resources required to deliver care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult inpatients with partial thickness burns

Exclusion Criteria:

  • superficial or full thickness burns, facial burns, intubated or sedated, pediatric

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: water-soluble therapy
The patient acted as their own control and the experimental and comparison arms (water-soluble therapy and silver sulfadiazine) were alternated on a daily basis
The patient acted as their own control and the experimental and comparison arms (water-soluble therapy and silver sulfadiazine) were alternated on a daily basis
The patient acted as their own control and the experimental and comparison arms (water-soluble therapy and silver sulfadiazine) were alternated on a daily basis
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: silver sulfadiazine
The patient acted as their own control and the experimental and comparison arms (water-soluble therapy and silver sulfadiazine) were alternated on a daily basis
The patient acted as their own control and the experimental and comparison arms (water-soluble therapy and silver sulfadiazine) were alternated on a daily basis
The patient acted as their own control and the experimental and comparison arms (water-soluble therapy and silver sulfadiazine) were alternated on a daily basis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain level
Time Frame: 180 minutes
Pain is assessed on a 0-10 point scale using both the patient's reported value and correlating with the value derived from nursing assessment using the visual analog scale. This is recorded at defined time points before, during, and after the dressing change
180 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to perform dressing changes
Time Frame: up to 180 minutes
The time to perform the dressing change in total and for various steps is recorded in minutes.
up to 180 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
narcotic medication administered
Time Frame: 180 minutes
All narcotics given for premedication and during the dressing change will be converted to their morphine-equivalent and totaled
180 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan Black, MD, University of Virginia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 21, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burn

Clinical Trials on water-soluble therapy

3
Subscribe