Efficacy of Focused Shockwave Therapy in Patients With CTS

February 14, 2022 updated by: Mahidol University

Efficacy of Focused Shockwave Therapy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, a Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment of upper extremity. Patients with CTS will experience symptoms of pain, numbness of tingling sensation along the median nerve distribution. In more severe case, patients may have difficult manipulating objects that disturb function and patient's quality of life. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) is one of physical modalities that uses to treat many musculoskeletal disorders. For CTS, previous evidence showed that ESWT can improve symptoms, function as well as electrophysiologic parameters. However, standardized guidelines as well as the study in patients with moderate to severe CTS has not been established. Thus, the objective of the present study was to evaluate efficacy of ESWT in term of symptoms, function, electrophysiologic parameters, as well as sonography of median nerve in patients with moderate to severe CTS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

  • The present study was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of focused ESWT (F-ESWT) to conservative treatment in patients with CTS.
  • 24 patients who was diagnosed as CTS based on symptoms of CTS and physical examination. They were randomly allocated into two groups (21 patients per group), mainly F-ESWT plus conservative treatment and conservative treatment only.
  • Outcome measures were BCTQ including symptom and function subscales, electrophysiologic parameters, and sonography to evaluate cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve. All measures were recorded at baseline, 3 weeks and 6 weeks of treatment.
  • Statistical analysis was performed to determine changes within the same group and compare difference between the two groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
        • Punpetch Siriratna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who were diagnosed as CTS based on the American Academy of neurology
  2. Participants who have electrodiagnostic evidence of CTS according to American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AANEM) guidelines for diagnosis of CTS. The severity of median nerve compression at wrist was moderate to severe degree.
  3. Patients who were not treated by NSAIDs within 2 weeks prior to participating in the study.

Exclusion Criteria: The below exclusion criteria were applied only on the affected hand that were enrolled to the study

  1. History of previous carpal tunnel release.
  2. Receiving steroid injections for the treatment of CTS
  3. History of infection or severe inflammation on the wrist
  4. Contraindications for focused ESWT, such as arrhythmias, pacemakers, bleeding disorders, pregnancy, severe osteoporosis, and cancer.
  5. Participants who refused or requested withdrawal from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (F-ESWT)
Participants in the intervention group received low-intensity F-ESWT once a week for three sessions plus conservative treatment.
F-ESWT (dose 0.01-0.15 mJ/mm2, frequency 4-5 Hz, 1500 shocks) was applied perpendicular to the palmar side of the wrist which was done once a week for a total of three sessions plus conservative treatment.
Other Names:
  • F-ESWT
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control
Participants in the control group received only conservative treatment including disease education, advice about proper posture and activity, night wrist splint and nerve gliding exercise.
Participants in the control group received only conservative treatment including disease education, advice about proper posture and activity, night wrist splint and nerve gliding exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Thai version of Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (T-BCTQ)
Time Frame: BCTQs and BCTQf were assessed changes from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
T-BCTQ was used to assess symptom severity and hand function in patients with CTS. This questionnaire consists of two parts, mainly BCTQ symptom severity (BCTQs) and BCTQ functional status (BCTQf). Total questions for each part were 11 and 8 questions, respectively with scores raging from 1-5.
BCTQs and BCTQf were assessed changes from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electrodiagnostic parameters: Distal Sensory Latency (DSL)
Time Frame: Changes of DSL was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
DSL was evaluated using Cadwell Sierra Summit model IEC601-1.
Changes of DSL was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
Electrodiagnostic parameters: Distal Motor Latency (DML)
Time Frame: Changes of DSL was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
DML was evaluated using Cadwell Sierra Summit model IEC601-1.
Changes of DSL was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
Electrodiagnostic parameters: Sensory Nerve Action Potential (SNAP) amplitude
Time Frame: SNAP amplitude was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
Sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitude was evaluated using Cadwell Sierra Summit model IEC601-1.
SNAP amplitude was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
Electrodiagnostic parameters: Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) amplitude
Time Frame: Changes of CMAP amplitude was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
CMAP amplitude was evaluated using Cadwell Sierra Summit model IEC601-1.
Changes of CMAP amplitude was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
Electrodiagnostic parameters: Total area under curve (TAUC)
Time Frame: Changes of TAUC was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
TAUC was evalauted using Cadwell Sierra Summit model IEC601-1.
Changes of TAUC was assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) at wrist level
Time Frame: Changes of median nerve CSA at wrist were assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
Median nerve CSA at wrist (pisiform level) was assessed by ultrasonography.
Changes of median nerve CSA at wrist were assessed from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
Median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA); wrist to forearm ratio
Time Frame: Median nerve CSA (wrist to forearm ratio) were assessed changes from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.
Median nerve CSA was assessed by ultrasonography in two levels, mainly at pisiform level and at the level of pronator quadratus muscle. CSA were then determined for wrist to forearm ratio.
Median nerve CSA (wrist to forearm ratio) were assessed changes from baseline to at 6 weeks of treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Punpetch Siriratna, MD, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Focused ESWT

Subscribe