To Assess Analgesia Provided by Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block in Patients With Hypertensive Leg Ulcer (ANGIOCATH)

March 1, 2019 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Monocentric Prospective Study, in Order to Assess Analgesia Provided by Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block, in Patients With Hypertensive Leg Ulcer.

Hypertensive leg ulcer, also called Martorell ulcer, represents 1 to 15% of leg ulcers in hospital. These ulcers are painful, long to heal, and hospitalization is sometimes necessary for analgesia and debridement of necrotic tissue. Strong opioids are often required, and are responsible of many side effects. Martorell ulcer arises predominantly in women over 60 years of age, with history of vascular disease, and therefore with a higher risk of adverse event. Pain is also part of the physiopathology, inducing a vasospasm which increases ulcer extension and ischemia.

This is why pain management is one of the main challenge in treatments of these ulcers.

Continuous nerve block of lower limbs are often used during per and postoperative orthopaedic surgery. Few adverse events and rare serious adverse events related to local anesthesic are reported (respectively <1% and <1/1000), and few adverse events related to catheter are reported (<1%). Its benefits have been proved on post-operative pain management and reeducation.

The aim of this study is to assess analgesia provided by continuous sciatic nerve block, in patients with hypertensive leg ulcer, during hospitalization.

Thirty patients will be enrolled on a 3-years period. They will receive a continuous sciatic nerve block with ropivacaïne 0,2%, during 7 days.

Pain intensity will be assessed by 4 datas : numerating rating scale (NRS) at rest, during wound care, maximal and mean. These datas will be collected over two 3-days period : the first 3 days of hospitalization, in which pain treatment will be prescribed depending on pain intensity of the patient ; and the first 3 days of ropivacaïne treatment.

The main evaluation criteria will be at least a 50% decrease of one of the pain NRS when receiving ropivacaïne.

Time to healing, microcirculation evolution measured by Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure (TcPO2), and quality of life of patients will be collected over a 6 months follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Nantes University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years old
  • Hospitalized for hypertensive leg ulcer with severe pain :
  • For which pain intensity has been collected over the first 3 days before catheter insertion (D0)
  • With severe pain (mean or at wound care) in spite of acetaminophen treatment (NRS ≥ 5/10), and/or with adverse events related to weak or strong opioids.
  • patients' written informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with moderate pain after 3 days of usual pain management in hospitalization : mean NRS<5/10 the 24 hours before D0
  • pregnant women
  • other ulcer causes, local or systemic infection
  • not able to provide informed consent or to answer the pain evaluation
  • dialysis patients
  • unstable active diseases
  • Charcot foot
  • Known allergy to any local anesthetics
  • Ankle-brachial index <0,6
  • hemodynamically significant stenosis on arterial Doppler ultrasound
  • current clopidogrel or prazugrel treatment the 10 days preceding catheter insertion
  • current clopidogrel or prazugrel treatment the 10 days preceding catheter insertion, with contraindication to salicylic acid
  • current anticoagulant treatment, with contraindication to LMWHs or UFH

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Ropivacaïne

The first 3 days, analgesic treatments will be provided, as usual, depending on pain intensity (EN <3/10 : non opioids, EN 3-5/10 : weak opioids, EN>5/10 : strong opioids).

If NRS is still over 5/10, continuous nerve block will be proposed. Patients will receive ropivacaïne, 5 mL/h during 7 days, with possibility of one bolus before wound care, through a stimulating catheter stimulong sono®.

In association, analgesic treatments will be provided, as usual, depending on pain intensity (as during the first 3 days).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of patient with a 50% decrease of one of the pain NRS
Time Frame: 3 days
The main evaluation criteria will be at least a 50% decrease of one of the pain NRS (at rest, during wound care, maximal or mean) with 3 days of ropivacaïne treatment, compared to 3 days of usual analgesic treatment.
3 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evolution of NRS
Time Frame: 6 month
NRS during the 7 days of ropivacaïne, and during the 6 months follow up
6 month
To assess patients's satisfaction with Patient Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
To assess quality of life using Short Form 36 (SF36)
Time Frame: 6 month
Quality of life using a standardized questionnaire : SF36
6 month
To assess pain consequences using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) and Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire(BPI)
Time Frame: 6 month
Pain consequences using standardized questionnaire : HAD, BPI
6 month
To assess microcirculatory evolution with a TCPO2 measure
Time Frame: 6 month
Microcirculatory evolution with a TCPO2 measure before and after ropivacaïne treatment
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Cécile DURANT, Dr, Nantes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 13, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 17, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 5, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertensive Leg Ulcer

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaïne

Subscribe