Electrode-Based Sensor for Non-Invasive Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring With Improved Reliability (FHR)

April 22, 2015 updated by: OBMedical Company
The specific goal of the proposed research is to develop a reliable, non-invasive fetal and maternal heart rate and contraction monitor that is unaffected by obesity and requires less nursing intervention than the tocodynamometer and Doppler ultrasound.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The majority of obstetric deliveries in the US undergo electronic monitoring and continuous uterine activity and fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring is the standard of care. Typically, external transducers are employed, the reliability of which depends on their proper positioning, which may be disturbed by patient or fetal movement. The tocodynamometer (strain gauge, toco for short) provides frequency and timing of contractions, but requires transmission of tension from the uterus to the sensor. Fetal heart rate is acquired with an external Doppler ultrasound transducer. The reliability of this monitor depends on the ability to obtain a window to the fetal heart.

In some patients, particularly the obese, the toco and ultrasound may fail to monitor consistently. In others both transducers require frequent repositioning by the nursing staff, and the Doppler may erroneously report maternal heart rate instead of fetal.

The alternative uterine activity monitor is an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC), which is placed through the cervical os in the adequately dilated patient with ruptured membranes. While this monitor usually provides a more reliable signal than the toco, as well as quantitative information regarding intrauterine pressure, it is invasive and there is an increased risk of infection. The alternative FHR monitor is via fetal scalp electrode (FSE), which is applied transvaginally to the fetal presenting part, also requiring adequate cervical dilation and ruptured membranes. While the FSE usually provides a more reliable signal, it is similarly invasive and increases risk of infection.

Maternal obesity (defined as BMI at presentation ≥ 30) is an ever-increasing problem in the US, and is even more prominent in the obstetric suite. Meanwhile, obese women have an increased risk for labor problems, infections and other complications. Noninvasive labor monitoring, while preferable to reduce the infection risk, is particularly unreliable in this population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women and Babies

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Laboring women in Labor and Delivery Ward

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parturients presenting to Labor & Delivery for labor at term (>36 weeks completed gestation)
  • Single viable fetus in cephalic presentation
  • With FSE or IUPC for obstetric indications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multi fetal gestation
  • Contraindication to FSE or IUPC placement
  • Insufficient abdominal space for all required sensors

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Electrode Sensor, FSE
Pregnant women between the ages of 18-50 with a single viable fetus in cephalic presentation monitored with Electrode Sensor, and/or FSE
Electrode Sensor, Ultrasound
Pregnant women between the ages of 18-50 with a single viable fetus in cephalic presentation monitored with Electrode Sensor, and/or Ultrasound

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fetal Heart Rate Interpretability
Time Frame: 2 hours
The Fetal Heart Rate (or FHR) of the electrode sensor will be compared to the FHR of the ultrasound when both are compared to the FSE. Percentage of time that signals are interpretable will be compared between devices
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Busowski, MD, Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women and Babies

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 31, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 12, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OBM-WP-2013
  • IRB (Other Identifier: University of Rhode Island)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laboring Women With Ultrasound and FSE Monitoring

Subscribe