Evaluation of 3 Versus 10 Days of Antibiotics in Skin Abscesses After Surgical Drainage

September 17, 2015 updated by: Lucy Holmes, MD

Randomized Non-inferiority Trial of 3 Versus 10 Days of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in Community-Associated Skin Abscesses After Surgical Drainage

The objective of this study is to determine if there is a difference in treatment failures and recurrent skin infections when patients are given 3 or 10 days of antibiotics for uncomplicated skin abscesses after they have been surgically drained.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients age 3 months to 17 years presenting to a pediatric Emergency Department (ED) with an uncomplicated skin abscess that required surgical drainage were randomized to receive 3 or 10 days of oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Patients were evaluated 10 to 14 days later to assess for cure. Patients were contacted 1 month later to determine if they had developed another skin infection. Outcomes were also stratified by methicillin-resistent staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

249

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Buffalo, New York, United States, 14222
        • Women & Children's Hospital of Buffalo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients presenting with a skin abscess that requires surgical drainage (induration ≥ 1 cm in diameter)
  • minimally invasive surgical technique with the insertion of a subcutaneous drain can be utilized on the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients requiring immediate hospitalization
  • patients who have received 2 or more doses of antibiotics in the previous 36 hours
  • patients with diabetes, sickle-cell disease, an immuno-compromising disease, an underlying medical condition predisposing the patient to frequent hospitalizations or medical visits, or indwelling catheters or percutaneous medical devices
  • patients with a concurrent, non-abscess infection
  • patients with an allergy to Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 10 days of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole
Oral Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole dosed at 10 mg Trimethoprim/kg/day divided twice a day, to a maximum of 640 mg Trimethoprim/day
3 versus 10 days of drug
Other Names:
  • Bactrim
  • Septra
Experimental: 3 days of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole
Oral Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole dosed at 10 mg Trimethoprim/kg/day divided twice a day, to a maximum of 640 mg Trimethoprim/day
3 versus 10 days of drug
Other Names:
  • Bactrim
  • Septra

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Failures
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks after surgical drainage
Treatment failures were defined as persistent or increased size of the original abscess requiring further medical or surgical intervention. Treatment cure was defined as no or minimal tenderness, erythema, fever, wound drainage, warmth, fluctuance or induration at the 10 to 14 day follow-up.
up to 2 weeks after surgical drainage
Treatment Failures Among Patients Infected With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks after surgical drainage
Treatment failures were defined as persistent or increased size of the original abscess requiring further medical or surgical intervention. Treatment cure was defined as no or minimal tenderness, erythema, fever, wound drainage, warmth, fluctuance or induration at the 10 to 14 day follow-up.
up to 2 weeks after surgical drainage
Treatment Failures Among Patients Infected With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus
Time Frame: up to 2 weeks after surgical drainage
Treatment failures were defined as persistent or increased size of the original abscess requiring further medical or surgical intervention. Treatment cure was defined as no or minimal tenderness, erythema, fever, wound drainage, warmth, fluctuance or induration at the 10 to 14 day follow-up.
up to 2 weeks after surgical drainage

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrent Skin Infections
Time Frame: 1 month after surgical drainage
Rate of recurrent skin infection among follow-up responders 1 month after enrollment. Patients who were treatment failures were excluded from this analysis since they all received additional medical intervention that could affect the outcome measure.
1 month after surgical drainage
Recurrent Skin Infections Among Patients Infected With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Time Frame: 1 month after surgical drainage
Rate of recurrent skin infection among follow-up responders 1 month after enrollment. Patients who were treatment failures were excluded from this analysis since they all received additional medical intervention that could affect the outcome measure.
1 month after surgical drainage
Recurrent Skin Infections Among Patients Infected With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus Aureus
Time Frame: 1 month after surgical drainage
Rate of recurrent skin infection among follow-up responders 1 month after enrollment. Patients who were treatment failures were excluded from this analysis since they all received additional medical intervention that could affect the outcome measure.
1 month after surgical drainage

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucy C Holmes, MD, University at Buffalo
  • Study Chair: Howard Faden, MD, University at Buffalo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2015

Last Verified

September 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Abscess

Clinical Trials on Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

3
Subscribe