A Comparison of Two Electronic Gloves in the Measurement of Joint Movement in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

November 4, 2020 updated by: Dr Joan Condell, University of Ulster

A Comparison of Two Electronic Goniometric Gloves in the Measurement of Joint Movement in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

In this study we will compare two electronic goniometric gloves to see if they can be used in research on joint movement in arthritis.

One of the gloves we will use is the commercially available '5DT Ultra 14 glove', the other is a glove that we have specially designed and developed for use in people with arthritis. Both gloves are 'high-end' gloves with sensors for all of the finger and thumb joints.

We aim to find out if the gloves are accurate and if they can be worn and used without too much discomfort by people with arthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This is an open pilot study to assess the usability and accuracy of two electronic goniometric gloves in measuring finger joint movement in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

We will use questionnaires to assess pain, stiffness and disability. We will be using an inner disposable glove worn under the electronic goniometric gloves as this will be important for infection control in clinical use.

We will calibrate the electronic goniometric gloves using wooden blocks at predefined angles using our own software calibration process to optimise the accuracy of the glove for the individual patient.

The patient will flex and extend their fingers repeatedly to get measurements of the minimum and maximum angle of flexion in their joints. During these movements we will also capture the dynamic characteristics of movement such as maximum velocity. In this study a laptop will be used to capture and record all of the measurements from the electronic goniometric glove and record the time at which the measurements were taken.

Each electronic goniometric glove will be refitted for a second set of tests to assess variability due to the fitting process. We will record a full set of data from each set of movements for later analysis.

Finally, we will assess usability and establish if patients have a preference between the two electronic goniometric gloves.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Londonderry, United Kingdom, BT47 1SB
        • Western Health and Social Care Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients aged 18 to 80
  • Diagnosis of Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Patients who have significant pain and stiffness in their hands
  • Correct hand size to achieve a good fit to the electronic goniometric glove

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor fit for the disposable surgical glove
  • Severe pain in the right hand
  • Severe swelling in the right hand (rated as such by the investigator)
  • Major permanent deformities in the right hand
  • Active hyperextension >30 degrees in any joint of the right hand
  • Broken or infected skin in the right hand
  • Known to have tested positive for Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin infections in the past
  • Unable to don the lining disposable glove without significant discomfort
  • History of Latex allergy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 5DT electronic data glove

Using the electronic data gloves to perform a set routine of movements.

Intervention: Data gloves to perform movements

Using the electronic data gloves to perform a set routine of movements:

  • 5DT 'dataglove 14 Ultra' Electronic glove (commercially available)
  • New 'Tyndall/UU' developmental dataglove
Other Names:
  • 5DT
  • Tyndall/UU dataglove
Experimental: Tyndall/UU electronic data glove

Using the electronic data gloves to perform a set routine of movements

Intervention: Data gloves to perform movements

Using the electronic data gloves to perform a set routine of movements:

  • 5DT 'dataglove 14 Ultra' Electronic glove (commercially available)
  • New 'Tyndall/UU' developmental dataglove
Other Names:
  • 5DT
  • Tyndall/UU dataglove

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The accuracy of joint angle measurement by each electronic goniometric glove will be compared with the accuracy of manual goniometry.
Time Frame: 1 day
The standard error of measurement for each electronic goniometric glove will be used to evaluate the reliability of each electronic goniometric glove. This will be compared to the standard error of measurement for manual goniometry.
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The variability in the measurement of joint movement velocity
Time Frame: 1 day
With rapid repeated movements of finger flexion and extension, the measured maximum velocity of movement should remain fairly constant. The intraclass correlation coefficient will be used to assess the variability in the measurement of joint movement velocity.
1 day
Variability of joint angle measurements by the electronic goniometric gloves will be assessed
Time Frame: 1 day
The Intraclass Correlation coefficient for joint angle measurement will be measured for each electronic goniometric glove
1 day
The number of patients who withdraw or refuse to continue
Time Frame: 1 day
Electronic goniometric gloves may not be easy to don and doff in patients with arthritis, particularly if used with an inner disposable glove. Because of the small numbers we will not apply a statistical analysis
1 day
Variation in joint angle movement between fit and refit
Time Frame: 1 day
If a electronic goniometric glove relies on accurate sensor positioning, refitting may give widely varying results. Each glove will be refitted once.
1 day
Variation in joint angle measurement across the range of movement
Time Frame: 1 day
With use of electronic goniometric gloves, joint angle measurement may be less accurate at the extremes of movement
1 day
Variation in joint angle movement across sensors - between digits
Time Frame: 1 day
Although it may be assumed that the sensors in each digit should perform equally well, the movement of the stretch sensors over the joints may vary between digits. This analysis will test for this variability
1 day
The number of patients who prefer one electronic goniometric glove over the other
Time Frame: 1 day
We will ask the patient which electronic goniometric glove they prefer. This will assess usability factors such as comfort, neatness of fit, and ease of donning and doffing.
1 day
The variation in joint angle measurement with force applied
Time Frame: 1 day
We will use the Intra class correlation test to determine if the accuracy of measurements is affected by the patient gripping tightly against a moulded object held in the palm of their hand.
1 day
We will test the variability of joint angle measurements in wrist extension/flexion
Time Frame: 1 day
We will compare the Intraclass Correlation coefficient for joint angle measurements carried out using the electronic goniometric glove in wrist extension/flexion
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philip Gardiner, MB BCh MD, WHSCT

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD may be considered available at a later date, anonymised.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Data gloves to perform movements

3
Subscribe