"Manual Dexterity and Oculomotor Control in Schizophrenia" (MADOCS)

October 18, 2017 updated by: Centre Hospitalier St Anne

"MADOCS: Manual Dexterity and Oculomotor Control as Vulnerability Markers in Schizophrenia"

The investigators recently showed that visuomotor integration was significantly altered in schizophrenic patients during: (i) a grip force task (Teremetz et al., 2014), and (ii) a saccadic paradigm (oculomotor task)(Amado et al., 2008). Given this findings, the investigators propose a combined study of oculomotor and grip force control to better characterize the sensorimotor integration deficit. This approach may allow for identification of behavioural biomarkers of vulnerability to develop schizophrenia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

1 - Scientific background and rational Use of sensory cues is essential for execution and correction of voluntary movements. The motor areas and their regulation is of special interest in patients with schizophrenia as there is clear evidence of motor abnormalities independent of the effects of antipsychotic medication, even before the onset of the disorder. Sensorimotor abnormalities have been proposed as a valid endophenotype in schizophrenia. Our global objective is to study and provide vulnerability markers for schizophrenia.

  1. Control of manual dexterity will be assessed by a force sensor (Power Grip Manipulandum, PGM)
  2. Oculomotor movements during behavioral task will be recorded using a video-oculography device
  3. The involvement of cortical inhibition in this volitional inhibition task will be studied by neuronavigation guided TMS coupled to EMG recording

2 - Description of the project methodology There is strong evidence for schizophrenia being a neuro-developmental disorder (Rapoport et al., 2005). It has been shown, for many years, that patients with schizophrenia exhibit abnormal patterns of sensorimotor integration (Manschreck et al., 1982), which is the capacity to integrate different sensory stimuli into appropriate motor actions. It is clinically relevant, in terms of early diagnosis and prevention, whether deficient sensorimotor integration is present in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia, and whether this constitutes a vulnerability marker for the disease.

Our global objective is to study the interactions and related substratum of oculomotor movements during force control task.

The secondary objectives:

(i) To show that increased motor noise is indeed present in schizophrenia. (ii) To show by TMS that cortical excitability in the primary motor cortex (M1) is task-modulated and decreased in schizophrenia.

(iii) Assess the role of deficient cortical inhibition in these behavioral deficits To this end, three different groups of subjects will be studied: schizophrenic patients, non-affected siblings, ultra high risk patients, non-treated schizophrenic patients and healthy control subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Service Hospitalo-Universitaire (SHU) - CHSA
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Isabelle Amado

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All groups:

    1. 18>yrs<50
    2. Medical visit completed
    3. Visual acuity (9/10 for each eye or corrected)
    4. Provided written informed consent
  • Group of patient suffering from schizophrenia:

    4. DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia 5. Treatment: stable atypical anti-psychotic medication for >3 months prior to the study

  • Group of UHR patient:

    6. 18>yrs<30 7. Fulfill at risk criteria of CAARMS diagnostic tool

Exclusion Criteria:

• All groups:

  1. IQ<70,
  2. Contraindications for TMS protocol: no previous history of neurosurgery or seizures or 1st degree relative with history of seizures, heart disease, drug abuse or addiction in the last 12 months, medications that lower seizure threshold including clozapine, bupropion, méthadone or theophylline.
  3. Metallic implant in head (except dental fillings)
  4. Pacemaker, or other electronic implanted devices
  5. Central neurological disease: parkinsonism, x
  6. Severe heart attack
  7. Instable clinical state (e.g. stroke)
  8. Previous history of drug abuse lasting more than 5 years or during the last year
  9. Life event with a moderate to severe impact
  10. Caffeine intake in the last two hours preceding visuomotor assessment

    • Groups of Siblings and Healthy controls:

  11. No previous history of psychiatric disease, psychotic spectrum disorder (according to DIGS 3.0)
  12. No previous history of antipsychotic medication (entire life)

    • Groups of UHR patient:

  13. Chlorpromazine dose >100mg over more than 12 weeks
  14. No previous history of autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder or diagnozed schizophrenia (according to DSM-IV-TR criteria), isolated anxiety disorders (e.g. social phobia, agoraphobia)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Schizophrenia
40 patients with diagnosis of schizophrenia (25 medicated - 15 non-medicated)
Control of manual dexterity will be assessed by a force sensor (Power Grip Manipulandum, PGM)
Oculomotor movements during behavioral task will be recorded using a video-oculography device
The involvement of cortical inhibition in this volitional inhibition task will be studied by neuronavigation guided TMS coupled to EMG recording
Other: Healthy sibling
25 healthy siblings
Control of manual dexterity will be assessed by a force sensor (Power Grip Manipulandum, PGM)
Oculomotor movements during behavioral task will be recorded using a video-oculography device
The involvement of cortical inhibition in this volitional inhibition task will be studied by neuronavigation guided TMS coupled to EMG recording
Other: Ultra high risk for developing Schizophrenia
15 patients with ultra high risk for developing Schizophrenia
Control of manual dexterity will be assessed by a force sensor (Power Grip Manipulandum, PGM)
Oculomotor movements during behavioral task will be recorded using a video-oculography device
The involvement of cortical inhibition in this volitional inhibition task will be studied by neuronavigation guided TMS coupled to EMG recording
Other: Controls
-25 age and gender-matched healthy controls
Control of manual dexterity will be assessed by a force sensor (Power Grip Manipulandum, PGM)
Oculomotor movements during behavioral task will be recorded using a video-oculography device
The involvement of cortical inhibition in this volitional inhibition task will be studied by neuronavigation guided TMS coupled to EMG recording

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioural assessment
Time Frame: BASELINE
Index reflecting motor performance during visuomotor task (including force and oculomotor control)
BASELINE

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical scale : PANSS
Time Frame: BASELINE
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale: Assess positive and negative symptoms
BASELINE
Clinical scale : DIGS III
Time Frame: BASELINE
Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies 3.0: Overview of clinical state
BASELINE
Clinical scale : BPRS
Time Frame: BASELINE
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: Assess schizophrenic symptoms
BASELINE
Clinical scale : SAS
Time Frame: BASELINE
Simpson Angus Extra-Pyramidal Scale: Asses extra-pyramidal signs
BASELINE
Clinical scale : AIMS
Time Frame: BASELINE
Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale: Assess abnormal involuntary movements
BASELINE
Clinical scale : TAP
Time Frame: BASELINE
Test battery for Attentional Performance: Assess attentional capacity (e.g. working memory)
BASELINE
Clinical scale : Stroop
Time Frame: BASELINE
Stroop color naming test: Assess selective attention or inhibition.
BASELINE
Clinical scale : WASI
Time Frame: BASELINE
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence: Assess intelligence quotient
BASELINE
Tracking performance (motor task): RMS Error
Time Frame: BASELINE
RMS Error (Root Mean Square)
BASELINE
Tracking performance (motor task): Coefficient of variability
Time Frame: BASELINE
Coefficient of variability
BASELINE
Tracking performance (motor task): Timing
Time Frame: BASELINE
Timing/inhibition
BASELINE
Ocolomotor performance (eye tracker) : Saccade
Time Frame: BASELINE
Saccade error (back up/ catch up saccades) during smooth pursuit and fixation
BASELINE
Ocolomotor performance (eye tracker): Gain
Time Frame: BASELINE
Gain (target velocity/gaze velocity), Reaction time
BASELINE
Ocolomotor performance (eye tracker): Amplitude of eye movements
Time Frame: BASELINE
Amplitude (°) and velocity (°/s) of saccadic movements
BASELINE
Motor noise
Time Frame: BASELINE
Variability of EMG response during visuomotor task
BASELINE
Cortical excitability (MEP; TMS)
Time Frame: BASELINE
Motor evoked potential (MEP) during visuomotor task (single pulse TMS)
BASELINE
Cortical inhibition (SICI; TMS)
Time Frame: BASELINE
Cortical inhibition measured during visuomotor task (paired-pulse TMS; MEP)
BASELINE

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Isabelle Amado, Dr, CHSA
  • Study Director: Pavel Lindberg, PhD, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 26, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Manual dexterity

3
Subscribe