Effect of Capnography Feedback During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR ) on Patient's Outcome

January 23, 2014 updated by: Seyedreza Mazloum, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Effect of Capnography Feedback During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Quality Performance of Rescuers and Outcome of the Patient

Compare the quality performance of rescuers and resuscitation outcomes of cardiac arrest patients in both groups with and without capnography feedback

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study has done at Mashhad Ghaem Educational center. Two nurses and an anesthesia resident selected and trained according to the latest guidelines of CPR . In the control sample, with the declare of code 99 and attend the team on the patient's bedside, CPR begins and then every two minutes, return of the patient checks in the usual way. quality performance of rescuers ,Recovery or death of the patient and the result is recording. In the second phase , group members were educated how to use capnography (Comdek's MD-660P Oxi-Capnography) in CPR and guiding restoration efforts by it. with the code 99 and attend the team on the patient's bedside capnography uses and its waveforms will appear on the monitor device which is visible to all rescuers and the quality of performance is renewed based on the its guidance. The two groups patients for age, sex, initial rhythm of arrest, time of arrest until the first action, the time of arrest until the first shocks are comparing to control these factors influence on the outcome. quality performance of rescuers , resuscitation outcomes and CPR duration and relative factors in each of the groups were recorded and compared.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Khorasan Razavi
      • Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, Iran, Islamic Republic of, (+98 511) 8023024-6
        • Ghaem Educational, Research and Treatment Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cardiac arrest patient age more than 18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age more than 80 cardiac arrest due to pulmonary embolism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: capnography, feedback, quality of cpr
capnography feedback was used for management of the resuscitation and quality of cpr performance in rescuers and outcomes of the patients was measured.
capnography feedback was used for management of the resuscitation and quality of cpr performance in rescuers and outcomes of the patients was measured.
NO_INTERVENTION: conventional cpr

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
chest compressions and artificial ventilation rate in a minute
Time Frame: By the end of twenty minutes of CPR
The number Of chest compressions and artificial ventilation rate in a minute by rescuers in both study groups (with and without capnography feedback) were assessed.
By the end of twenty minutes of CPR

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return of spontaneous circulation or death of patient at the end of resuscitation
Time Frame: about twenty minutes After start of CPR
Return of spontaneous circulation or death of patient at the end of resuscitation in both study groups (with and without capnography feedback) were assessed.
about twenty minutes After start of CPR

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tayebe PourGhaznein, MSc, MUMS

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 27, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • capnography feedback

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary Arrest

Clinical Trials on capnography feedback

Subscribe