Resuscitation and Capillary Reperfusion (ReCapp)

September 22, 2022 updated by: Michael Holzer, Medical University of Vienna

REsuscitation and CAPillary rePerfusion - A Cohort Study With Prospective Inclusion

Persistent microperfusion alterations after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) are associated with poor survival. To our knowledge, no human studies evaluating microperfusion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with simple and pre-hospital available tests have been published. Capillary refill time (CRT) and skin-mottling-score (SMS) are parameters for microperfusion and evaluated in septic and cardiogenic shock. In animal studies, microperfusion was impaired during cardiac arrest, although not correlating with systemic blood pressure.

The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between impaired microcirculation (as measured with CRT and SMS) during resuscitation and ROSC resp. neurological outcome. Our clinical impression in daily routine is, that the appearance of a patient undergoing CPR is often linked to the outcome. We hypothesize, that this is due to changes in microperfusion of the skin.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria
        • Vienna Municipal Emergency Service

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 91 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients ≥18 years during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • witnessed cardiac arrest

Exclusion Criteria:

  • insufficient manpower (e.g. study team has to provide CPR)
  • hypovolemia (exsanguination, anaphylaxis, sepsis as underlying cause)
  • presumed or known COVID-19 disease
  • hypo-/hyperthermia (<36.0°, >37.5°C)
  • Raynaud's disease
  • Peripheral arterial disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Capillary refill time (CRT)
Time Frame: baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Capillary refill time in seconds measured on one finger and one earlobe for ROSC vs. no ROSC
baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Skin mottling score (SMS)
Time Frame: baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study = minute 0), minute 2, 4, 6, 8, (...) up to return of spontaneous circulation or death, whichever came first
Skin mottling score (Ait-Oufella, H., Lemoinne, S., Boelle, P.Y. et al. Mottling score predicts survival in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 37, 801-807 (2011). Best: 0 - no mottling to worst: 5 - mottling on the entire leg) for ROSC vs. noROSC
baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study = minute 0), minute 2, 4, 6, 8, (...) up to return of spontaneous circulation or death, whichever came first
Capillary blood lactate (Lac)
Time Frame: baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study, = minute 0), minute 4, 8, 12, 16, 20
Capillary lactate in mmol/L from the capillary bed of a finger for ROSC vs noROSC and for correlations with CRT, SMS
baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study, = minute 0), minute 4, 8, 12, 16, 20
Hospital mortality
Time Frame: baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of CRT, SMS and Lac with hospital mortality
baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of CRT, SMS and Lac and 30 days good neurological outcome
Time Frame: baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Good neurological outcome at 30 days measured with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC 1-5 (1 best: good cerebral performance, 5 worst: brain dead), modified Rankin scale (mRs 0-6 (0 best: no symptoms, 6 worst: dead) and health utility index 3 (HUI-3, worst: -0,36 - best: 1)
baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of CRT, SMS and Lac and hospital discharge good neurological outcome
Time Frame: baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Good neurological outcome at hospital discharge measured with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC 1-5 (1 best: good cerebral performance, 5 worst: brain dead), modified Rankin scale (mRs 0-6 (0 best: no symptoms, 6 worst: dead) and health utility index 3 (HUI-3, worst: -0,36 - best: 1)
baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of CRT/SMS and lactate
Time Frame: baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of CRT/SMS and lactate
baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of SMS and CRT
Time Frame: baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of SMS and CRT
baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of time since cardiac arrest and CRT/SMS/lactate
Time Frame: baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of time since cardiac arrest and CRT/SMS/lactate
baseline (immediately after inclusion to the study)
Correlation of catecholamine demand during the first 48 hours after ROSC and CRT/SMS
Time Frame: from ROSC up to 48 hours after ROSC
Cumulative catecholamine demand during the first 48 hours after ROSC in correlation with CRT/SMS/Lac during resuscitation
from ROSC up to 48 hours after ROSC
Capillary refill time (CRT)
Time Frame: minute 2, 4, 6, 8, (...) up to return of spontaneous circulation or death, whichever came first
Capillary refill time in seconds measured on one finger and one earlobe for ROSC vs. no ROSC
minute 2, 4, 6, 8, (...) up to return of spontaneous circulation or death, whichever came first

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Holzer, MD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary Arrest With Successful Resuscitation

Subscribe