Pleural and Pericardial Effusion Following Open Heart Surgery (IMAGING)

November 16, 2015 updated by: Laura Sommer Hansen, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

The Clinical Impact of an Aggressive Approach Towards Pleural and Pericardial Effusions Following Open Heart Surgery: a Step Towards Standard Guidelines

One of the most common postoperative complications after open cardiac surgery is fluid accumulation between the pleural membranes or in the pericardial sac. This study investigates the consequence of such fluid accumulations on physical performance, recovery-time, cardiac and respiratory complications, and quality of life. Half of the participants will be followed closely and offered fluid drainage at a low threshold, and half of the participants will follow the current postoperative regimen.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction:

Knowledge concerning the impact of pleural and pericardial effusions on physical performance, recovery-time, cardiac and respiratory complications, and quality of life after open cardiac surgery is scarce. A more aggressive approach towards effusions has been suggested, but further studies are needed.

Objectives:

  1. to determine the size of pleural and pericardial effusion that results in at least 30% reduction of physical performance in the 6-minute walk test.
  2. to compare the improvement in physical performance between the intervention group and the control group, measured from baseline to day 30 after surgery.

Materials and methods:

A randomised controlled intervention trial. Patients admitted for open cardiac surgery (aortic valve surgery, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and combinations) will be randomised into either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group will be followed with physical tests and ultrasonic examination the month following surgery. Pleural or pericardial effusion of a predefined size will be drained. The control group will follow the current postoperative regimen.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years.
  • Admitted for elective aortic valve surgery, coronary artery bypass graft surgery or combinations.
  • Be able to understand the written and oral patient information and to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgical combinations involving the mitral valve since they are already examined with full echocardiography prior to discharge, which may influence protocol driven decisions.
  • Simultaneous participation in any other clinical intervention trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: current postoperative regimen
The group will follow the current postoperative regimen at the surgical ward; screening for pleural effusions with x-ray and further diagnostic procedures in case of symptoms. Treatment will be entirely in the hands of the clinical personnel.
Experimental: pleuracentesis
The group will follow the current postoperative regimen. In addition they will be followed with ultrasound examination, clinical examination, spirometry examination and 6 minute walk test. In case of either a) pleural effusion > 400ml OR b) pleural effusion< 400ml with symptoms in rest or during the walk test, the effusion will be drained and examinations will be repeated. In case of pericardial effusion of predefined size and location, either the surgeon on call or a cardiologist will be consulted.
Direct needle drainage of pleural effusions with dynamic ultrasound technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in walking distance before and after intervention
Time Frame: day 4, day 15, day 30
The primary outcome measure is the change in walking distance before and after pleuracentesis, subsequently the size of pleural effusion (both cm measured on ultrasound and drained volume) that results in a reduction of distance in the 6 minute walk test of at least 30%.
day 4, day 15, day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in walking distance from baseline to day 30 after surgery
Time Frame: day 0 and day 30
The difference in walking distance from before surgery (day 0) to after surgery (day 30) will be compared between the intervention arm (+ pleuracentesis) and the control arm (standard postoperative regimen)
day 0 and day 30

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
needle pleuracentesis versus pigtail catheter
Time Frame: day 0, day 4, day 15 and day 30
To asses how much of the pleural effusion is drained when performing needle puncture instead of inserting a pigtail catheter. Secondary to compare the complication rate of the two procedures.
day 0, day 4, day 15 and day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Vibeke E. Hjortdal, MD PHD DMSc, Aarhus University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 17, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Disease

3
Subscribe