Cook IVC Filter Study (CIVC)

January 11, 2022 updated by: Cook Research Incorporated
This prospective, multicenter, double-arm clinical study further evaluated the safety and effectiveness of Cook's commercially available inferior vena cava (IVC) filters (specifically, the Günther Tulip® Vena Cava Filter and Cook Celect® Vena Cava Filters) in patients in need of temporary or permanent IVC filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

473

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
        • The Alfred Hospital
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Addenbrooke's Hospital
      • Hull, United Kingdom, HU3 2JZ
        • Hull Royal Infirmary
      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • John Radcliffe Hospital
    • Hampshire
      • Southampton, Hampshire, United Kingdom, S016 6YD
        • Southampton General Hospital
    • Meyerside
      • Liverpool, Meyerside, United Kingdom, L7 8XP
        • The Royal Liverpool University Hospital
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85021
        • Abrazo Arrowhead Campus
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • University of Florida Health - Shands
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
        • Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33140
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center
      • Pensacola, Florida, United States, 32504
        • Coastal Vascular and Interventional
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago
      • Peoria, Illinois, United States, 61637
        • OSF St. Francis/Peoria Radiology Research and Education Foundation
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
        • MedStar Union Memorial Hospital
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
        • Johns Hopkins University
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook Medicine
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • North Carolina Memorial Hospital
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28203
        • Carolinas Medical Center
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health and Science University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Hershey Medical Center
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Rhode Island Hospital
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The Methodist Hospital - Smith Tower
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22904
        • University of Virginia Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Requires temporary or permanent IVC filter placement for the prevention of PE

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to contrast medium that cannot be adequately premedicated
  • Known allergy or sensitivity to cobalt, chromium, or nickel
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months
  • Patient refuses blood transfusions
  • At risk of septic embolism
  • Medical condition or disorder that would limit life expectancy to less than 12 months or that may cause noncompliance with the protocol or confound the data analysis
  • Existing IVC filter
  • Duplicate IVC
  • Anatomy that would prevent safe filter placement (e.g., condition of access vessels)
  • IVC diameter > 30 mm or < 15 mm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Günther Tulip® Vena Cava Filter
Temporary or permanent filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism
Experimental: Cook Celect® Vena Cava Filters
Temporary or permanent filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Participants With Technical Placement Success and With 12-month Freedom From New Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism (PE) While a Filter is Indwelling.
Time Frame: 12 months
The protocol defined technical placement success as: deployment of filter in a location suitable to provide sufficient mechanical protection against PE with no filter deformation, fracture, premature release, or clinical migration (caudal or cranial movement of a filter resulting in a surgical or endovascular intervention).
12 months
The Rate of 12-month Freedom From Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time Frame: 12 months

MAEs were defined as clinical perforation, clinical migration, clinical fracture, embolization of the filter or filter fragments to the heart or lungs, IVC thrombotic occlusion, new symptomatic DVT while the filter is indwelling, access site complications with clinical sequelae, and procedure-/device-related death.

Clinical perforation - Protrusion of filter legs through the wall of the IVC causing hemorrhage or hematoma or touching, impressing, or perforating another organ. Documented using CT.

Clinical migration - Caudal or cranial movement of a filter resulting in surgical or endovascular intervention.

Clinical fracture - A loss of structural integrity (breakage or separation) of the filter identified by imaging and associated with clinical sequelae and/or requiring intervention.

12 months
Supplemental Analysis to the Safety Endpoint: The Number of Participants With 12-month Freedom From Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
Time Frame: 12 months

MAEs were defined as clinical perforation, clinical migration, clinical fracture, embolization of the filter or filter fragments to the heart or lungs, IVC thrombotic occlusion, new symptomatic DVT while the filter is indwelling, access site complications with clinical sequelae, and procedure-/device-related death.

A filter retrieval is considered a successful safety result through 12 months, regardless of when the retrieval occurred.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Technical Placement Success and 12-month Freedom From New Symptomatic PE While Filter is Indwelling
Time Frame: 12 months

Rate of technical placement success and 12-month freedom from new symptomatic PE while a filter is indwelling for the combined patient population (i.e., the Celect and Günther Tulip strata).

The protocol defined technical placement success as: deployment of filter in a location suitable to provide sufficient mechanical protection against PE with no filter deformation, fracture, premature release, or clinical migration (caudal or cranial movement of a filter resulting in a surgical or endovascular intervention).

12 months
Rate of 12-month Freedom From Major Adverse Events for the Combined Patient Population (i.e., the Celect and Günther Tulip Strata)
Time Frame: 12 months

MAEs were defined as clinical perforation, clinical migration, clinical fracture, embolization of the filter or filter fragments to the heart or lungs, IVC thrombotic occlusion, new symptomatic DVT while the filter is indwelling, access site complications with clinical sequelae, and procedure-/device-related death.

Clinical perforation - Protrusion of filter legs through the wall of the IVC causing hemorrhage or hematoma or touching, impressing, or perforating another organ. Documented using CT.

Clinical migration - Caudal or cranial movement of a filter resulting in surgical or endovascular intervention.

Clinical fracture - A loss of structural integrity (breakage or separation) of the filter identified by imaging and associated with clinical sequelae and/or requiring intervention.

12 months
Number of Participants With Freedom From Grade 2 or Grade 3 Filter Leg Interaction With IVC, Filter Migration, Filter Fracture, and Filter Embolization at 12-month.
Time Frame: 12 months

Filter interaction with IVC is defined as :

Grade 2: Filter strut is entirely outside of the IVC lumen and within the retroperitoneum as evidenced by a "halo" of retroperitoneal fat around axially viewed strut.

Grade 3: Filter strut is touching, impressing, or perforating another organ (e.g., liver, bowel, aorta, psoas muscle, vertebral body, lymph nodes).

Filter migration : Change in filter position compared to its deployed position (cranial or caudal).

Filter fracture : Any loss of structural integrity (breakage or separation) of the filter identified by imaging or autopsy. Documented by imaging or at autopsy.

Filter embolization : Post-placement movement of the filter or its components to a distant anatomic site completely out of the target zone (i.e., heart/lungs). Documented by imaging or autopsy.

12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Filter Retrieval Rate
Time Frame: 2 years

The filters may be retrieved if clinically indicated. The IVC filter and IVC were assessed on imaging before a retrieval attempt.

(The filter retrieval rate= the total number of filter retrieved / the total number of filter retrieval attempted)

2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: H. Bob Smouse, MD, OSF St. Francis/Peoria Radiology Research and Education Foundation
  • Principal Investigator: Robert Feezor, MD, University of Florida Health-Shands

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 18, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Embolism

Clinical Trials on Günther Tulip® Vena Cava Filter

Subscribe