Parent Program to Improve Child Behavior Problems

January 14, 2019 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Improving Child Behavior Problems in the Primary Care Setting

The purpose of this research study is to learn whether or not a brief parenting program called Child Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE) offered at a primary care office can help improve behavior problems in children who are 2-6 years old.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study will be a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the CARE intervention. The study will include 2-6 year old children who receive their primary care at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, South Philadelphia Primary Care clinic and whose caregiver and/or doctor has concern about a behavior problem in the child. The caregivers will also be subjects in the study.

Child-caregiver pairs who agree to be in the study will be randomly assigned to receive the CARE training immediately or in 3-4 months.

The CARE intervention will last 6 weeks and child behavior and parenting will be measured at baseline, 6-8 weeks, and 14-18 weeks. Investigators will also measure parent satisfaction with the CARE intervention.

  • Child Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE) is a group parent training program.
  • The goals of the program are to teach parents skills that help their children successfully reach developmental milestones while increasing positive behaviors.
  • The program also was designed to help parents manage and decrease negative child behaviors.
  • Each training will be led by 2 therapists and 4-10 parents will attend the CARE program together.
  • Children do not attend the training but parents are encouraged to practice the skills learned at CARE between the sessions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19145
        • CHOP Primary Care, South Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Caregiver is 18 years or older
  2. Caregiver is English speaking
  3. Child is 2-6 years old
  4. Caregiver reports that child has a behavior problem
  5. Child attends CHOP South Philadelphia Primary Care for primary care
  6. Parental/guardian permission is provided (informed consent)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Child has a cognitive age less than 2 years old as determined by the referring clinician
  2. Child is already receiving behavioral health therapy or medication (other than medication for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Delayed CARE
40 child-caregiver pairs will be randomized to usual treatment plus delayed CARE (control). Under usual treatment, patients will be referred to a behavioral health specialist at the discretion of their pediatrician and the office social worker for additional diagnosis and treatment and/or provided with a 1-2 page informational handout on child behavior problems from the CHOP patient care manual. Following the final interview (3-4 months after enrollment for each subject) all participants randomized to the control arm (usual treatment plus delayed CARE) will receive the CARE training, if desired.
Experimental: Immediate CARE
40 child-caregiver pairs will be randomized to usual treatment plus immediate CARE. The trainings are administered to groups of 4-10 caregivers at a time and are led by two mental health providers trained in the CARE curriculum. The children do not attend the training; however, caregivers are expected to practice the skills that they learn in CARE with their child between sessions. The curriculum involves 6 sessions over 6-8 weeks. Each session will be 1-2 hours.
CARE is a group parent training informed by the principles of Parent Child Interaction Therapy and was developed by Trauma Treatment Training Center and CHOP Policy Lab. CARE has been used in many populations including residential treatment center/domestic violence shelter staff, daycare providers, graduate students, biological parents, and foster parents/caseworkers. Goals are to decrease stress for caregivers, improve child behavior, and enhance the caregiver-child relationship, family stability, and wellness. The training teaches parents to follow a child's lead thus building a connection and promoting positive behaviors. The focus is on giving attention to child's pro-social behavior and ignoring minor misbehavior. The second phase teaches techniques for giving effective commands.
Other Names:
  • Child Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) Score at Different Time Points (Baseline up to 18 Weeks)
Time Frame: Mean Change in ECBI Scores from Baseline to 14-18 weeks. Decreases in ECBI scores reflect improvements in behavior.
Behavior will be measured by the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI). The primary outcome is the ECBI change score (time 3-time1). The ECBI is a parent rating scale designed to measure conduct problem behaviors in children ages 2-16 years. The instrument contains 36 items that assess behavior on two scales. The problem scale provides a yes/no problem identification rating for each item, and the sum of yes responses yields a problem score with a potential range from 0 to 36 with a clinical cutoff of 15. The intensity scale provides a frequency-of-occurrence rating for each item, ranging from never (1) to always (7) and the ratings are summed to yield an intensity score with a potential range from 36 to 252 with a clinical cutoff of 131. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. The ECBI has demonstrated strong internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and discriminant validity and has been shown to be a sensitive indicator of intervention efficacy for child behavior problems.
Mean Change in ECBI Scores from Baseline to 14-18 weeks. Decreases in ECBI scores reflect improvements in behavior.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes From Baseline in Parental Disciplinary Practices Assessed at Different Time Points (Baseline up to 18 Weeks)
Time Frame: Mean change in scores from baseline to 14-18 weeks. Increases in scores indicate decreased risk for abuse and better outcomes.

Investigators want to determine the effect of the CARE intervention on diminishing harsh parenting as measured by the Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory-2.

The Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory-2 (AAPI-2) is a 40 item parent-report measure that assesses parenting attitudes along 5 dimensions: inappropriate expectations of children, parental lack of empathy towards children's needs, strong belief in the use of corporal punishment as a means of discipline, reversing parent-child role responsibilities, and oppressing children's power and independence.

Parents respond to each item on a five point Likert Scale of Strongly Agree, Agree, Disagree, Strongly Disagree and Uncertain. This measure yields a score of 1-10 for each construct. Higher scores indicate lower risk parenting.

Mean change in scores from baseline to 14-18 weeks. Increases in scores indicate decreased risk for abuse and better outcomes.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joanne N Wood, MD, MSHP, CHOP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 13-010728

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Behavior Problems

Clinical Trials on Immediate CARE

Subscribe