Evaluating a Shortened Version of the Incredible Years (IY) Basic Programme in a Non-clinical Community Sample

July 29, 2016 updated by: Charlotte Reedtz, Regional centre for children and youth mental health and welfare

Evaluating a Shortened Version of the Incredible Years Basic Programme in a Non-clinical Community Sample

Aim of study:

To evaluate the effects of the shortened version of the Incredible Years (IY) Basic programme, the study which the parents were recruited to. A randomising experimental control between-group design was used with pre- and post-intervention measurements, and a one-year, four-year and ten-year follow-up. Children and families were randomized to either the shortened basic version (n = 89), or the control group (n = 97).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

189

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 8 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • No diagnosable behavior problems in child

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosable behavior problems in child

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Brief Incredible Years parent training
Parent training
The IY parent training programme (3-8 years) developed by Webster-Stratton at the Parenting Clinic, University of Washington, is a manualised and video-based training programme for parents of young children with conduct problems (Webster-Stratton and Reid, 2003a). Parents assigned to the short IY Basic (S-IY) condition were divided into groups of 10-12 parents. The S-IY was led by two experienced group leaders and parents met weekly for two-hour sessions at a public health care center in the community. The group leaders led discussions regarding central aspects of parenting on the basis of the video vignettes, role play and homework.
Other Names:
  • The Incredible Years Programme series
NO_INTERVENTION: No parent training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Longitudinal change in ECBI scores
Time Frame: baseline, 6-8 weeks after intervention, one-year follow up, four-year follow up, ten-year follow up
Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (Robinson et al., 1980). The ECBI provides a list of 36 problem behaviours commonly reported by parents of children with disruptive behaviour problems. The inventory assesses behaviour on two dimensions: the frequency of the behaviour and its identification as a problem. The frequency ratings range from 1 (never) to 7 (always), and are summed to yield an overall problem behaviour Intensity score (Cronbach's alpha 1⁄4 0.82) ranging from 36 to 252.
baseline, 6-8 weeks after intervention, one-year follow up, four-year follow up, ten-year follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reasons for participation and help seeking behaviour
Time Frame: Four-year follow up
A questionnaire consisting of 12 questions was developed to assess parents' reasons for participating in child rearing classes. Three subscales measure parental concern (five items, a 1⁄4 0.82), motivation to learn (three items, a 1⁄4 0.42), and own/other's opinion (three items, a 1⁄4 0.42). The questionnaire was sent to all participants in the study. Examples of the questions were: ''I was concerned for my child's behaviour'', ''I was uncertain of how to raise my child'', and ''I think it's interesting to learn about children''. All questions were answered using a five-point Likert scale from ''agree'' to ''disagree''.
Four-year follow up
Longitudinal change in PROC scores
Time Frame: baseline, 6-8 weeks after intervention, one-year follow up, four-year follow up, ten-year follow up
Parents Sense of Competence (Johnston and Mash, 1989). The PSOC consists of 16 items about parents' confidence on being a parent, answered on a six-point scale ranging from ''strongly disagree'' to ''strongly agree''. Scoring for some items is reversed so that, for all items, higher scores indicate greater parenting self-esteem. Two subscales measure efficacy (seven items, a 1⁄4 0.69) and satisfaction (nine items, a 1⁄4 0.77) in parenting.
baseline, 6-8 weeks after intervention, one-year follow up, four-year follow up, ten-year follow up
Longitudinal change in PSI scores
Time Frame: baseline, 6-8 weeks after intervention, one-year follow up, four-year follow up, ten-year follow up
Parent Stress Index, Short Form (PSI-SF; Abidin, 1995). The PSI-SF is a 36 item self-report measure of parenting stress, derived from the full version PSI. The PSI-SF yields a total stress (a 1⁄4 0.90) in addition to scores on three scales: parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child.
baseline, 6-8 weeks after intervention, one-year follow up, four-year follow up, ten-year follow up
Longitudinal change in PPI scores
Time Frame: baseline, 6-8 weeks after intervention, one-year follow up, four-year follow up, ten-year follow up
Parenting Practices Interview (Webster-Stratton et al., 2001). The PPI was adapted from the Oregon Social Learning Centre's Discipline Questionnaire. Two subscales were used; Harsh Discipline (14 items, a 1⁄4 0.79), and Positive Parenting (15 items, a 1⁄4 0.67). Parents reported the probability and the frequency with which they used the different strategies on a seven-point scale.
baseline, 6-8 weeks after intervention, one-year follow up, four-year follow up, ten-year follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Charlotte Reedtz, Dr. Philos, Arctic University of Norway

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2004

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2016

Last Verified

July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Shortened version Basic IY

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Behavior Problems

Clinical Trials on Brief Incredible Years parent training

Subscribe