Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Venous Ultrasonography of the Legs for Pulmonary Embolism (IRM-EP2)

Diagnostic Performances of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined With Venous Ultrasonography of the Legs for Pulmonary Embolism

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a promising technique but can not be used as an alternative test to multidetector CT in patients with suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE) due to its low sensitivity and high proportion of inconclusive MRI. The purpose of this study is to evaluate diagnostic performances of MRI combined with venous ultrasonography of the legs in patients with suspicion of PE.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

887

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria :

  • age > or = 18 years
  • clinical suspicion of PE
  • Affiliate (e) to a social security
  • provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria :

  • Unstable patient clinically in shock on arrival at the emergency department
  • Current pregnancy
  • Life expectancy less than 3 months (eg terminal cancer)
  • Follow up at 3 months impossible
  • Anticoagulation curative> 48 hours prior to inclusion
  • Cons-indication to spiral chest CT: allergy to contrast or creatinine clearance below 30 ml / min calculated by the Cockcroft
  • Cons-indication to MRI claustrophobia, presence of intraocular metallic implant or a pacemaker, an allergy to gadolinium, morbid obesity (weight> 130 kg, anteroposterior> 60 cm diameter)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
In case of positive D-dimer testing or in patients with a high clinical probability of PE, these patients have MRI protocol combined with venous ultrasonography of the legs. MRI includes 2 different sequences: Unenhanced steady-state-free precession sequences (SSFP) sequences and angiography sequences. (please see \\\"intervention section\\\" for more details). MRI readings will be performed centrally by two independent readers blinded to the results of diagnostic reference standard. Venous ultrasonography of the legs will be interpreted locally.
In case of positive D-dimer testing or in patients with a high probability of PE, MRI and a venous ultrasonography of the legs are done.MRI protocol includes 2 sequences: 1-Unenhanced steady-state-free precession sequences (SSFP) are acquired first without ECG-gating or breath-holding in the axial plane in the multiphase cine mode, with 6 phases per location.The acquisition is repeated to cover 2-3 of the thorax, from the roof of the aorta to the diaphragm. 2- A pulmonary gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequence is performed in the axial plane.The acquisition is triggered to start when contrast enhancement occurred in the right ventricle.Two acquisitions are necessary to cover the anatomy. For each acquisition, 0.15 mL kg-1 body weight of DOTAREM Gadolinium is injected at a rate of 3 mL s-1 followed by an injection of 15 mL of normal saline at 3 mL s-1.Venous ultrasonography of the legs: the examination consists of a real-time B-mode examination of the common femoral and popliteal veins.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess diagnostic performances of MRI combined with venous ultrasonography of the legs in reference to Multi-Detector Computed Tomography and 3 months clinical follow-up
Time Frame: 51 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of the combination of MRI and venous ultrasonography of the legs
51 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a strategy combining clinical probability, D-dimer measurement, MRI and venous ultrasonography of the legs for PE
Time Frame: 51 months
3-month thromboembolic events rate in patients who were left untreated on the basis of negative D-dimer measurement or negative combination of MRI + venous ultrasonography of the legs
51 months
To assess diagnostic performances of each MRI sequence combined or not to venous ultrasonography of the legs in reference to Multi-Detector Computed Tomography and 3 months clinical follow-up
Time Frame: 51 months
sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of each MRI sequence (unenhanced 2D steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) and contrast-enhanced 3D angiographic MR sequences) combined or not to venous ultrasonography of the legs in reference to Multi-Detector Computed Tomography and 3 months clinical follow-up
51 months
inter-reader agreement for MRI
Time Frame: 51 months
Kappa coefficient of concordance calculated on the diagnoses on MRI by two radiologists blinded to the diagnostic reference strategy (multidetector CT angiography and follow-up 3 months).
51 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: SANCHEZ Olivier, MD, PhD, Université Paris Descartes; Sorbonne Paris Cité; Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs, Hôpital Européen Georges POmpidou; AP-HP

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Embolism

Clinical Trials on MRI combined with venous ultrasonography of the legs

3
Subscribe