Effects of Balance Training in Older Adults With Dementia

February 25, 2014 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Effects of Task-oriented Balance Training in Institutionalized Older Adults With Dementia

Purpose -To investigate whether older adults with dementia who have balance and gait problems can improve their balance and gait function after an individualized 4-week tasks-oriented balance training with sensory manipulation.

Hypothesis

-There is significant difference of Timed Up and Go Test, Berg Balance Scale, walking speed, 30-s chair-stand test, Chair sit-and-reach test and Barthel Index between dementia patients who received tasks-oriented balance training and those didn't receive after 4-weeks training and one month follow-up.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 886-108-67
        • The Catholic Foundation of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia St. Joseph Home for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient provides oral consent, and written consent obtains from next of kin
  • Older than 65 years
  • Diagnosis of dementia, based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) or The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10)
  • Can follow order to complete the screening test(Timed Up and Go test)
  • Has balance and gait problems
  • Can standing independently with/without assistive device or can standing with minimal assistance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Newly developed cardiopulmonary disease and other exercise contraindications
  • Other neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disease that might affect the outcome(ex. Recent stroke, fracture or orthopedic surgery)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Balance training
4 weeks individualized task-oriented balance training, twice a week and 1 hour each session
Active Comparator: Control
Control group received 4 weeks upper extremities exercise in sitting position

4 weeks upper extremities exercise in sitting position, twice a week and 1 hour each session

weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Change from Baseline of Timed Up and Go test
baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Berg Balance Scale
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Change from Baseline of Berg Balance Scale
baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
walking speed
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Change from Baseline of walking speed
baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30-s chair-stand test
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Change from Baseline of 30-s chair-stand test
baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
chair sit-and-reach test
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Change from Baseline of chair sit-and-reach test
baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Saint Louis University mental status examination
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Change from Baseline of Saint Louis University mental status examination
baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Barthel index
Time Frame: baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up
Change from Baseline of Barthel index
baseline, post-treatment, 1-month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ming-Hsia Hu, Ph.D., School of Physical Therapy, National Taiwan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Task-oriented balance training

3
Subscribe