Contribution of the Cerebellum In Sensory-motor Adaptation Via Gamma Oscillations: the Case of Dystonia (GAMMA)

Contribution du Cervelet Dans l'Adaptation Sensori-motrice Via Les Oscillations Gamma : le Cas de la Dystonie

Dystonia, a disabling disease with uncontrolled movement disorders was considered to be a manifestation of basal ganglia dysfunction, yet there is accumulating evidence from animal and human experiments that the cerebellum plays a prominent role in the pathophysiology of dystonia. Our recent results suggest a deficient cerebellar sensory encoding in dystonia, resulting in a decoupling of the motor component from the afferent information flow resulting from changes in the environment. An overall loss of gabaergic-mediated inhibition is at the forefront in dynamic changes in neural circuitry described in dystonia. In the mature brain gabaergic control the generation of temporal synchronies and oscillations in the glutamatergic neurons. Taken these all together with the results of a pilot experiment, the investigators hypothesize that deficient synchronies in the fast gamma range are one of the key mechanisms leading to abnormal communication inside the cerebello-cortical network in dystonia. The investigators aim first to demonstrate it by means of MEG (Magneto encepholography) recordings allowing to reconstruct the spatio-temporal dynamics of gamma oscillations in the nodes of the cerebello-cortical network. The investigators then aim to re-establish (if lost) or boost (if decreased) the defective synchronies by applying to the cerebellum at high gamma frequency a non invasive transcranial alternative current stimulation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75651
        • ICM GH Pitié Salpetrière

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary upper limb dystonia
  • normal physical and neurological examination except for dystonia
  • no treatment with botulinum toxin during the three months preceding the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Writing tremor
  • current neurological or psychiatric illness other than dystonia
  • uncontrollable medical problems not related to dystonia
  • pregnancy, breast feeding women and women who are of childbearing age and not practicing adequate birth control

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Healthy subjects
healthy subjects will receive either sham or active cerebellar stimulation
OTHER: Dystonia
dystonic patients will receive either sham or active cerebellar stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in gamma oscillations power in the cerebellum during a sensorimotor adaptation task
Time Frame: measures will be done at each of 3 visits: visit1, visit2 at expected average 7 days after visit1 and visit3 at expected average 14 days after visit1

MEG recording will be performed using a whole-head 306-channels MEG system (Elekta Neuromag® TriuxTM System) comprising 204 planar gradiometers and 102 magnetometers regularly distributed at 102 locations over the scalp. MEG data will be coregistered with the structural MRI of each subject using BrainStorm (http://neuroimage.usc.edu/brainstorm).

The localization of the source will be constrained with the individual anatomy obtained with MRI.

measures will be done at each of 3 visits: visit1, visit2 at expected average 7 days after visit1 and visit3 at expected average 14 days after visit1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
synchrony in the gamma band between the cerebellum and the sensorimotor cortex
Time Frame: measures will be done at each of 3 visits: visit1, visit2 at expected average 7 days after visit1 and visit3 at expected average 14 days after visit1
We will also conduct a functional connectivity analysis to assess the neuronal interactions between the cerebellum and the thalamus, the thalamus and the motor cortex by quantifying correlations between power envelopes. We will compute Pearson's linear correlation between the power envelopes from two different locations (between couples of magnetometers and couples of nodes at the source level).
measures will be done at each of 3 visits: visit1, visit2 at expected average 7 days after visit1 and visit3 at expected average 14 days after visit1

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
behavioral performances at a sensorimotor adaptation task
Time Frame: measures will be done at each of 3 visits: visit1, visit2 at expected average 7 days after visit1 and visit3 at expected average 14 days after visit1
Subjects will have to reach six different targets positioned on a half-circle and appearing in a predictable order on a computer screen by moving a amagnetic joystick with their right hand. During the direct condition, there will be a direct coupling between the joystick and the cursor position. During the indirect conditions, 4 different rotations between the joystick and the cursor positions will be introduced. During one session the shifts will be 10°, 30°, -20°, -40° and in the other session -10°, -30°, 20°, 40° in order to reduce possible skill transfer from the baseline session to the stimulation session. Indirect and direct trials will be randomized to avoid habituation and learning within a session. There will be 2 blocks of 160 trials. In each block, there will be 20 trials for each rotation and 80 trials of the direct condition
measures will be done at each of 3 visits: visit1, visit2 at expected average 7 days after visit1 and visit3 at expected average 14 days after visit1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: sabine meunier, MD, PhD, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 27, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Dystonia

Clinical Trials on active cerebellar stimulation

3
Subscribe