- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02095743
Tolerance of PICC Line Versus Implanted Port for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer (EPIC)
Phase II Randomised Study Comparing the Tolerance of PICC Line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) and Implanted Port for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-negative Early Breast Cancer
Adjuvant chemotherapy is frequently proposed to patients presenting early breast cancer, in case of high risk of recurrence (large tumors, node involvement, high grade…). Due to its toxicity toward veins, chemotherapy must be administered through a central venous device. Today, one can use either an implanted port or a PICC line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter). A PICC line is easier to implant and to explant, but has to be flushed every week and may impact daily life (no swimming, some clothes may not fit). On the other hand, a port is subcutaneous and lets patients lead a normal life, but its implant and explant require a cutaneous incision with possible complications (bleeding, pain, infection). For both venous devices, complications such as thrombosis or infection may happen. Published data comparing the two devices are heterogeneous and do not often distinguish patients treated for different diseases at various stages. Empirically in daily practice, for long term use (>6 months) a port is usually preferred, whereas for short-term treatments (<6 weeks) a PICC line is used. In the case of Her2 negative early breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy usually lasts 4 to 5 months. There is no scientific evidence for preferring one device to the other for these patients.
The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the patients' satisfaction and tolerance of each of the two devices.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rouen, France, 76038
- Centre Henri Becquerel
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women age > 18
- Documented breast cancer
- No Her2 overexpression
- Patients operated with curative intent (no distant metastasis at diagnosis)
- Patients undergoing an adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 3 courses of FEC 100 (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin 100mg/m² and cyclophosphamide ) followed by 3 courses of Taxotere, or 6FEC100 (according to CHB refencial for localised breast cancer treatment).
- Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral axillary node dissection
- History of bilateral upper thoracic irradiation
- Cutaneous disease (eczema, scleroderma, infection…) at catheter insertion site (arm or upper thorax)
- Recent thrombosis of the upper body
- Therapeutic anticoagulation
- Tracheotomy
- Treatment for bacteriemia in process
- Altered hemostasis: INR > 1.5 ; APTT > 1.5 , platelets < 60 G/l
- Renal failure with creatinine clearance < 60mL/min
- Involvement in another trial
- Contraindication to chemotherapy by FEC 100 or taxotere
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Protected major patient (under guardianship).
- Psychosocial disorders : decompensated mental disorders, no social security coverage, patient who does not speak french
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: PICC line
Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)
|
The description of the device could found on the published marketing authorisation
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Implanted Port
Use of an implanted port for chemo administration
|
The description of the device could found on the published marketing authorisation
Other Names:
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the central venous device
Time Frame: 37 weeks
|
To define between the two device (PICC line and implanted port) which one provides the less probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the device (SAERD), from the insertion to the first consultation of survey (36-38 weeks after implantation of the device which is also 5 months after its ablation).
|
37 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patients' satisfaction for the use of their central venous device
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Evaluation of the patients' satisfaction assessed by the QLQ C30, and by a 19 questions home-made questionnaire dedicated to the use of central veinous devices
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Florian Clatot, MD, Centre Henri Becquerel
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CHB 13-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Early Stage Breast Carcinoma
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingAnatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Early Stage Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma | Early Stage HER2-Positive Breast CarcinomaUnited States
-
The Netherlands Cancer InstituteBOOG Study Center; Stichting Treatmeds; Zorgevaluatie en Gepast Gebruik (ZE&GG); Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland (IKNL)Not yet recruitingBreast Cancer Stage II | Breast Cancer Stage III | Triple -Negative Breast Cancer | Early Stage Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma | Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC), Early Setting
-
Breast Cancer Trials, Australia and New ZealandETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation; Breast International GroupActive, not recruitingEarly Stage Breast CarcinomaSpain, Taiwan, Ireland, Australia, Argentina, Italy, New Zealand, Switzerland, Chile
-
European Institute of OncologyActive, not recruitingEarly Stage Breast CarcinomaItaly, Chile, Spain, Switzerland
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity of LuebeckActive, not recruitingEarly-Stage Breast CarcinomaGermany
-
Kliniken Essen-MitteGerman Breast GroupCompletedEarly-Stage Breast CarcinomaGermany, Switzerland
-
University College, LondonUnknownEarly-Stage Breast CarcinomaUnited Kingdom
-
Fudan UniversityNot yet recruitingBreast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3)China
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingEarly Stage Breast CarcinomaUnited States
-
Cyrcadia HealthStanford University; Ohio State University; SalesforceUnknown
Clinical Trials on Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)
-
University of Child Health Sciences and Children...Enrolling by invitationJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisPakistan
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingRecurrent Hodgkin Lymphoma | Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia | Refractory Lymphoma | Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma | Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma | Recurrent Lymphoma | Clonal Cytopenia of Undetermined Significance | High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 RearrangementsUnited States