Comparative Analysis of Cost-effectiveness of Silver Dressing in Burns (ARGENTUM)

May 15, 2021 updated by: Luciane Cruz Lopes, University of Sorocaba
The evidence is insufficient to determine whether the types of dressings containing silver differ in time / proportion for complete wound healing and pain. We will analyze the cost-effectiveness of these dressings in outpatients, considering the service provided by the Brazilian National Public Health System.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Randomized, single-center, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Adult patients (age between 18 and 65 years), regardless of sex, with second degree burns treated in outpatient regimen will be randomized (1:1) into two groups: 1% silver sulfadiazine and nanocrystalline silver.

Primary outcome:

- Proportion of lesions completely epithelialized within 15 days.

Secondary outcomes:

  • Time in days for complete epithelialization of the burned areas;
  • Number of dressing changes;
  • Level of pain associated with the application and removal of the dressings;
  • Direct medical and non-medical costs;
  • Need for surgery;
  • Incidence of infection;
  • Presence of local adverse reactions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sao Paulo
      • Sorocaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 18030-083.
        • Clinic of the Burn Treatment of Sorocaba's Hospital Complex

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged between 18 and 65 years;
  • Regardless of sex and ethnicity;
  • Presenting second degree burns (partial thickness involving the epidermis and part of the dermis, with at least the preservation of some dermal appendages from of which the wound can eventually be epithelialized spontaneously) (ARTZ; MONCRIEF; PRITT, 1980) under an outpatient regimen, without the need for surgical debridement of devitalized tissue and skin grafts informed in the initial clinical diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with diabetes;
  • Pregnant women;
  • Patients with intellectual disabilities;
  • Patients with burns to the face or on the palmar face of the hands or on the plantar face of the feet, as the need for specific treatment was felt to prevent functional sequelae;
  • Patients who have already started treatment in other institutions;
  • Those whose burns had happened 5 or more days before their entrance in the hospital;
  • Those incapable of signing the informed consent form or who have declined to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nanocrystalline silver
Flexible polyester low-grip coated nanocrystalline silver dressing. The dressing was applied to the lesion after being soaked in sterile distilled water. About this compresses to bandage movements will have been added and comes to avoid tourniquet bandage on-site maintenance, temperature of the affected area, cushioning and absorption of wound exudate when present. Is finished with the application of crepe bandages in the form of flakes containment curative and maintenance of pressure. This procedure aids in the bloodstream, and avoids the increased edema. The bandage is started from the periphery to the central region, avoiding tourniquet. The exchanges were performed every three days.
Flexible polyester low-grip coated nano-crystalline silver layer. The level of silver is 1.64 mg/ cm². This dressing enables the sustained release of silver in humid conditions dynamically and reached a higher plateau than 60 mg / L in less than 2 hours, and maintains a uniform level by 72 hours.
Other Names:
  • Acticoat
Active Comparator: Silver sulfadiazine
Ranges for rayon containing cream 1% silver sulfadiazine were used. Involving this layer, bandages for dressings were added in movements back and forth to avoid the tourniquet, providing maintenance of the temperature of the affected area, cushioning and absorption of wound exudate when present. This application was completed with crepe bandages to contain the dressing and maintain pressure. This procedure aids in the bloodstream, and avoids the increased edema. The bandage is started from the periphery to the central region, scales, avoiding the tourniquet. Dressing changes were performed daily.
This is at Standard treatment. The cream silver sulphadiazine at 1% was applied on the burn aseptically in a thick layer, approximately 3 to 5 mm, ie 5 g per 80 cm2
Other Names:
  • Silvazine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete epithelialization of the wound
Time Frame: 15 days
Proportion of lesions completely epithelialized during the specific time frame
15 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of dressing changes
Time Frame: 30 days
The number of dressing changes in the patients
30 days
Direct medical and non-medical costs of treatment
Time Frame: 15 days
The medical and non-medical cost of the treatment comparing both dressings
15 days
Level of pain
Time Frame: 30 days
Level of pain associated with the application and removal of dressings
30 days
Sugery
Time Frame: 90 days
The need for surgery
90 days
Infection
Time Frame: 30 days
The incidence of infection
30 days
Adverse reactions
Time Frame: 90 days
Any adverse reactions caused by the silver dressings
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luciane C Lopes, PhD, UNISO

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Second-degree Burn

Clinical Trials on Nanocrystalline silver

3
Subscribe