"Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing D2 vs D3 Lymphadenectomy With Gastric Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

November 20, 2023 updated by: Dr Shailesh Vinayak Shrikhande, Tata Memorial Centre

Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing D2 Versus D3 Lymphadenectomy on Outcomes of Non-metastatic, Resectable, But Locally Advanced, Gastric Cancer Following Neoadjuvant (Perioperative) Chemotherapy (ELANCe Trial)

Stomach cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths in India. Curative surgery offers the only chance of improving survival in this cancer. In patients whose cancer has not spread to other parts of the body (beyond the stomach and lymph nodes around it), removal of stomach (gastrectomy) with lymph nodes around the stomach and along the major vessels supplying blood to the stomach (D2 lymphadenectomy) is regarded as current standard of care at Tata Memorial Centre. However, the extent of lymphadenectomy is controversial. Some studies have suggested that removing more lymph nodes, even around the major vessels of the abdomen (aorta and inferior vena cava) may not only help to accurately determine the disease spread, but may also confer an additional survival benefit. Removing more lymph nodes around the major vessels may increase the risk of morbidity to the patient.

In the last 5-6 years, stomach cancer specialists around the world have resorted to giving half the cycles of chemotherapy to the patient before the surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), and the other half after the surgery in what is called 'perioperative chemotherapy'. This has been shown to lead to more patients surviving to 5 years, than before.

The investigators feel that perioperative chemotherapy with D2 lymphadenectomy may constitute the best care for our patients with stomach cancer such that no further removal of lymph nodes beyond is required. However, the investigators have no evidence in literature to support this hypothesis. The investigators have thus designed this trial based on which we propose that there exists no difference between a D2 lymphadenectomy and a D3 lymphadenectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for non-metastatic, locally advanced but resectable gastric cancer. The data will enable the development of clear management guidelines for lymph node dissection in stomach cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The only data comparing D2 and D3 comes from a multi-institutional, non-randomised study which reported that D3 lymphadenectomy conferred a survival advantage over D2 in tumours that were 50-100mm in diameter, with or without lymph nodal disease.

Of the three published randomised controlled trials(RCT) comparing D2 versus D2+paraaortic nodal dissection (PAND), two of the studies in which the long-term results are available, were carried out in Japan. In both these studies, the patients were not offered chemotherapy until after they developed a recurrence. Another reason is the benefit on survival, albeit modest, in patients undergoing D3 lymphadenectomy that has been noted in the study by Wu et al.

Another important reason for comparing D2 versus D2+PAND, lies in the fact that none of the aforementioned RCTs have been performed after the 1998 revision in the definition of lymph node stations by the Japanese Gastric cancer association. Hence, none of these results can be considered representative of the current classifications.

Duly considering the possible higher morbidity that has been shown with a complete para aortic lymph node dissection, the investigators propose to study a more extensive lymphadenectomy than D2 but without increasing the risk of morbidity in the patient.

D2 lymphadenectomy has been performed at Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), since 2002 with morbidity and mortality rates comparable to world literature It is the standard form of lymphadenectomy in TMC. Hence, the trial will be performed by surgeons experienced in the technique. D3 is performed in some centres in Japan, Italy and Taiwan (where the only randomized controlled trial demonstrated a survival benefit of D3 over D1). Both the procedures are well established and regarded as standards in different parts of the world.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Maharashtra
      • Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400012
        • Recruiting
        • Dr Shailesh Vinayak Shrikhande
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dr Shailesh V Shrikhande, MBBS MS MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr.Ashwin L Desouza, MBBS MS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr Mukta Ramadwar, MBBS MD MRC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr Mahesh Goel, MBBS MS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr Shaesta Mehta, MBBS DNB MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr Nitin shetty S Shetty, MBBS MD DNB
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr Supreeta Arya, MD DNB DMRD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr Keadar Deodhar, MBBS MD MRC
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr Munita Bal, MBBS MD DNB
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr.Shraddha Patkar, MBBS MS
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Dr.Abhishek Mitra, MBBS MS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ECOG performance status of 0 - 1 in patients deemed fit to undergo surgery at the pre-anaesthetic check
  • Histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma
  • No evidence of distant metastases, or locally advanced inoperable disease, as evaluated by computed tomography, chest radiography, ultrasonography, and / or laparotomy
  • Patient able to provide valid informed consent
  • Patient completed at least 1 cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any 1 of the following:
  • Previous or concomitant other cancer
  • Primary Oesophageal involvement extending to the stomach
  • Distant hepatic / extrahepatic disease discovered on laparotomy
  • Gross local disease in the porta precluding a curative resection
  • Patient did not consent for the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: D2 Lymphadenectomy
Intervention D3 Lymphadenectomy
D3 Lymphadenectomy involves surgical removal of lymph nodes from echelon or compartments 1 to 3 in gastric cancer patients
Experimental: D3 Lymphadenectomy
Comparator D2 Lymphadenectomy
D3 Lymphadenectomy involves surgical removal of lymph nodes from echelon or compartments 1 to 3 in gastric cancer patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
primary endpoint:Overall Survival
Time Frame: 5 year
overall survival will be calculated from randomization to death.
5 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 2 year
Disease-free survival will be calculated from definitive resection to the first event (i.e., local recurrence, distant recurrence, or death from any cause
2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr Shailesh V Shrikhande, MBBS MS MD, Tata Memorial Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2013

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 31, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

May 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

data of patient kept confidential

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on D3 Lymphadenectomy

Subscribe