Instant Messaging Program (Wechat) Improve the Quality of Bowel Preparation

December 20, 2014 updated by: Yanglin Pan, Air Force Military Medical University, China

Communication Through Instant Messaging Program for the Improvement of Bowel Preparation: a Two Centers Study

Colonoscopy is the gold standard in the diagnosis of colorectal disease. The success of colonoscopy depends on high-quality bowel preparation by patients. Inadequate bowel cleansing reduces the cecal intubation rate, and the polyp detection rate (PDR). It also increases costs, mostly due to repeated procedures. The quality of bowel cleansing has remained suboptimal even though numerous different products and regimens have been tested and compared in no fewer than six meta-analyses. Therefore, a completely different approach to improve bowel cleansing is welcome.

Here the investigators assume that instant messaging program (Wechat) delivery the detail and FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) of bowel preparation instructions would improve the quality of the bowel preparation. The Wechat program has some advantages, 1. Wechat supports over 400 million users, nearly half of the mobile subscribers population in China; 2. Wechat provided a real time communications including voice messages, pictures and text exchange timely; 3.Compare with telephone, Wechat is economical of both time and money; 4. Compare with bowel preparation instructional software and litera or cartoon educational booklet, Wechat is more interactive and responsive.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

770

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Foshan, Guangdong, China, 528000
        • Department of gastroenterology, Chancheng Central Hospital of Foshan
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Department of gastroenterology, Shaanxi Second People's Hospital
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710032
        • Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-80
  • PEG as purgatives;
  • using we-chat software by patients or their relatives
  • outpatients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of colorectal surgery
  • known severe colonic stricture or obstructing tumor
  • known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation
  • pregnant or lactating women
  • patients who cannot give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IMP education
patients in this group are educated about bowel preparation by instant messaging program and meanwhile a booklet was also sent to them.
The detail and FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) of bowel preparation instructions is delivered by Wechat.
Other Names:
  • Wechat education
No Intervention: normal education
patients in this group are educated about bowel preparation on the day of reservation by nurse for about 15 minutes and meanwhile a booklet was also sent to them.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adequate bowel preparation quality at the time of colonoscopy defined by Ottawa score<6
Time Frame: up to 5 months

Ottawa score:A)cleanliness of each part of the colon: 0=excellent 1=good 2=fair 3=poor 4=inadequate B)fluid in whole colon: small=0 moderate=1 large=2

The bowel preparation was considered inadequate if (1) inadequate visualization on colonoscopy defined by Ottawa score≥6; (2) the colonoscopy was cancelled because of poor bowel preparation; (3) incompleted colonoscopy because of inadequate bowel preparation (the Ottawa score was rated as 14 when patients with failed colonoscopy because of inadequate bowel preparation).

up to 5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Polyp detection rate
Time Frame: up to 5 months
The proportion of participants with at least one polyp in each group
up to 5 months
Compliance rate to instruction
Time Frame: up to 5 months
The proportion of participants compliance to the instructions of diet and bowel preparation in each group
up to 5 months
Willingness undergo a repeated bowel preparation
Time Frame: up to 5 months
The number of participants have a willingness to undergo a repeated bowel preparation if needed
up to 5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yanglin Pan, M.D., Air Force Military Medical University, China
  • Principal Investigator: Limei Wang, M.D., Department of gastroenterology, Shaanxi Second People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

May 16, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20140508-5 (Other Identifier: Ethics committee of Xijing Hospital)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bowel Preparation

Clinical Trials on IMP interactive education

Subscribe