Comparison of Efficacy Between Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency and Bipolar Radiofrequency for Acne Scar

July 31, 2014 updated by: Seoul National University Hospital

Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety Between Fractional Microneedling Radiofrequency and Bipolar Radiofrequency Treatment for Acne Scar

Compare the efficacy and safety profile of microneedling radiofrequency and that of bipolar radiofrequency treatment for acne scar.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency for acne scar Efficacy and safety bipolar radiofrequency treatment for acne scar compare the efficacy and safety profile of microneedling radiofrequency and that of bipolar radiofrequency treatment for acne scar

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • moderate acne scar
  • mild to moderate acne lesions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • taking acne medication oral drugs within 2 months topical drugs within 2 weeks
  • taken anu procedures for acne scar within 6 months
  • taking steroid,nonsteroidal antiinflammtory drugs, isotretinoin
  • underlying diabetes mellitus, keloid, or any malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: microneedling radiofrequency device
microneedling radiofrequency
Microneedling radiofrequency device is composed of 49 insulated microneedle which emit radiofrequency from the needle tip. This radiofreqeuncy generates dermal heat which evokes biological effect.
Other Names:
  • INFINI(Lutronics, Goyang, Korea)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: bipolar radiofrequency device
bipolar radiofrequency treatment
bipolar radiofrequency instrument gives out bipolar radiofrequency from the hand piece tip. This bipolar radiofrequency generates dermal heat which has a lot of bilogical effect.
Other Names:
  • Polaris(syneron, israel)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global assessment of acne scar
Time Frame: 12 weeks
5-point grading of acne scar quartile assessment of acne scar improvement through comparing the photos taken before treatment and after treatment
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ECCA
Time Frame: 12 weeks
quantitative assessment of acne scar ECCA assessment is established by previous article. this method quantifies severity of acne scar by counting the number of acne scar categorized by their shape. Then, the number of scars are multiplied by weighing factors determined by scar types. ECCA is the total sum of these points. please refer the Dreno et al, Dermatology, 2007;214:46-51
12 weeks
Adverse effect
Time Frame: 12 weeks
adverse effects were measured by Epithelization Scale. ES is the total sum of evaluation of three components after wounding. please refer this article Min et al, Wound Repair and Regen, 2014;22(2):212-9
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 4, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2014

Last Verified

July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scar

Clinical Trials on microneedling radiofrequency device

Subscribe