Rosacea Radiofrequency Microneedling

April 2, 2026 updated by: Ariel Eva Eber, University of Miami

Split-Face Comparison of 532nm Potassium Titanyl Phosphate (KTP) Laser Treatment Versus Radiofrequency Microneedling in Combination With 532 KTP Laser for Erythematotelangiectatic or Papulopustular Rosacea

There are 3 main objectives of this proposal as follows: (1) to assess the efficacy of radiofrequency microneedling in the treatment of erythematotelangiectatic and or papulopustular rosacea, (2) to determine the potential for combination treatment of radiofrequency microneedling with the 532 nm KTP laser, and (3) identify potential novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of rosacea.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami Beach, Florida, United States, 33128
        • Recruiting
        • University of Miami Dermatology Miami Beach Clinic
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ariel Eber, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alyx Aigen, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gabriela E Beraja, DO

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female adult (>18yo) subjects in general good health
  2. Clinical and/or histologic diagnosis of erythematotelangiectatic or papulopustular rosacea.
  3. Subject is able to understand and sign informed consent
  4. Subject is able to complete the study and comply with study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients currently utilizing oxymetazoline or brimonidine.
  2. Presence of dermatoses that might interfere with diagnosis as determined by a study investigator
  3. Presence of extreme light sensitivity, or conditions pre-disposing to light sensitivity such as but not limited to xeroderma pigmentosum
  4. Any significant medical condition that may prevent the patient from participating in the study according to the investigator's assessment
  5. History of poor wound healing or blood-clotting abnormality
  6. History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring
  7. Hypersensitivity or contraindication to local anesthetics as determined by the principal investigator or other medical professional.
  8. Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) Laser Therapy with unilateral Radiofrequency Microneedling
Participants will be in this group for up to 36 weeks
Participants will receive full face treatments with 532 nm KTP laser for 3 sessions at 8-12 weeks apart. Laser therapy will be conducted in person. Each laser treatment session will last up to 10 minutes.
Participants will receive unilateral facial treatments with radiofrequency microneedling device for 3 sessions at 8-12 weeks apart. Radiofrequency microneedling will be conducted in person. Each treatment session will last up to 1 hour.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Rosacea severity measured by the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA)
Time Frame: Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment
Score range from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe erythema). Lower scores indicate less rosacea severity as assessed by the CEA scale.
Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Patient reported impact on quality of life (QOL) measured by DLQI
Time Frame: Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment
Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) is a validated 10-item questionnaire assessing the impact of dermatological conditions on a patient's QOL, with scores ranging from 0 (no impact) to 30 (extremely large impact). Higher scores indicate higher impact on QOL.
Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment
Change in patient satisfaction with treatment outcomes measured by Patient Self-Assessment (PSA)
Time Frame: Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment
The PSA scale measures the patient's subjective satisfaction with skin's appearance on a scale of 0 (clear of unwanted redness) to 4 (completely unacceptable redness). Higher scores indicate less satisfaction.
Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment
Change in Global Aesthetic Improvement scale (GAIS)
Time Frame: Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment
The GAIS scores range from 1 (very much improved) to 5 (the appearance is worse than the original condition). Higher scores indicate less satisfaction.
Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment
Proportion of blinded photo assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment
Proportion of identification of before and after photos by three blinded rosacea experts will be reported. Expert identification greater than or equal to 80% or greater will be reported.
Baseline, up to 16 weeks after the last treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ariel Eber, MD, University of Miami

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20240859

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rosacea, Papulopustular

Clinical Trials on KTP Laser Therapy

Subscribe