Imaging Collaterals in Acute Stroke (iCAS) (iCAS)

March 17, 2020 updated by: Greg Zaharchuk, Stanford University

Imaging Collaterals in Acute Stroke

Stroke is caused by a sudden blockage of a blood vessel that delivers blood to the brain. Unblocking the blood vessel with a blood clot removal device restores blood flow and if done quickly may prevent the disability that can be caused by a stroke.

However, not all stroke patients benefit from having their blood vessel unblocked.

The aim of this study is to determine if special brain imaging, called MRI, can be used to identify which stroke patients are most likely to benefit from attempts to unblock their blood vessel with a special blood clot removal device. In particular, we will assess in this trial whether a noncontrast MR imaging sequence, arterial spin labeling (ASL), can demonstrate the presence of collateral blood flow (compared with a gold standard of the angiogram) and whether it is useful to predict who will benefit from treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV tPA) is the standard of care treatment for stroke patients when treatment can be initiated within 3 hours after symptom onset. Unfortunately, only a very small fraction of stroke patients is treated with tPA, and benefits from tPA. This is the result of two main limitations of tPA therapy.

First, the proportion of patients that can be treated with iv tPA is small. Because of the narrow three hour time-window during which tPA is effective, only patients who arrive to the hospital early on can be treated with tPA. Most stroke patients, however, arrive at the hospital after the three-hour time-window and are therefore excluded from tPA treatment. Second, stroke patients who receive tPA do not always benefit because the treatment does not restore blood flow in all patients.

Patients with persistent blood vessel occlusions and no improvement in their clinical condition after receiving tPA or those arriving at the hospital outside the 3 hour time window routinely undergo mechanical clot removal to open an occluded blood vessel in the brain.

Mechanical clot removal increases the percentage of stroke patients who achieve recanalization, and as a result may increase the proportion of patients who have good clinical outcomes. However it is unclear for which stroke patients mechanical thrombectomy is most suitable. Although effective at removing blood-clots, it appears that mechanical clot retrieval is not beneficial for all patients. Whereas some patients benefit, others experience no effect, and yet others are likely harmed by mechanical clot retrieval. In order to avoid harm and maximize benefit it is important to know, prior to initiation of the mechanical clot retrieval procedure, if the procedure is likely to result in a clinical improvement. We hypothesize that the response to mechanical clot retrieval can be predicted based on characteristics of an MRI scan obtained just prior to the retrieval procedure. In particular, this study will assess whether a new non-contrast MR imaging method, arterial spin labeling (ASL), which measures cerebral blood flow and can give insight into collateral flow, is effective at predicting who will benefit most from treatment. The investigators hope to learn if these new MRI techniques can help identify which patients are most likely to benefit from mechanical clot removal after receiving tPA.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

187

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Castro Valley, California, United States, 94546
        • Eden Medical Center
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94035
        • Stanford University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98122
        • Swedish Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting to the hospital with diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke who are scheduled to undergo (or have undergone) acute IA stroke therapy will be screened for study enrollment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Age 18 and older
  2. Clinical diagnosis of ischemic stroke and an associated score on the NIHSS of 5 or more points
  3. Planned to undergo (or has undergone) intra-arterial (IA) thrombectomy and/or thrombolysis for acute hemispheric stroke. (Either as primary therapy or as adjuvant therapy following intravenous tPA treatment)
  4. Planned to undergo or has undergone an MR brain scan including MR perfusion imaging (ASL & bolus PWI) and MR angiography of the circle of Willis prior to IA therapy
  5. Intra-arterial thrombectomy can be started within 90 minutes of completion of the MR perfusion scan and within 24 hours of symptom onset (Start of IA therapy is defined as the time of insertion of the femoral artery sheath; Time of brain scan is defined as the time that the scan is completed)
  6. Able to obtain informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Any pre-existing illness resulting in a modified Rankin Scale Score of 2 or higher prior to the qualifying stroke
  2. Creatinine clearance < 40 ml/min based on the NIDDK four-variable MDRD method (non-weight based)
  3. Documented allergy to MR contrast agent
  4. MRI contraindications (pacemaker, etc.)
  5. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
favorable clinical response
Time Frame: day 30
A "favorable clinical response", defined as an 8-point or more improvement on the NIH score when comparing the baseline score to the 30-day score or NIH score of 0 or a 30-day NIH score of 0-1
day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
modified Rankin Score
Time Frame: day 90
90 day modified Rankin Score 5-6 and 90 day modified Rankin distribution
day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregory Zaharchuk, MD, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Acute

Subscribe