Epidemiology, Identification Rate and Treatment Penetration of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Switzerland (SwOF)

September 8, 2014 updated by: Prof. Dr. med. Kurt Lippuner

Pilot Study on the Epidemiology, Identification Rate and Treatment Penetration of Vertebral Fractures Due to Osteoporosis in Switzerland (SwOF)

In Switzerland, the prevalence of vertebral fractures in community- dwelling women is unknown and the published data from the Swiss hospitals statistics represent only the tip of the iceberg. In addition, the percentages of women correctly identified with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis and the treatment rate of these women with a drug proven to reduce the risk of further fractures are unknown. Furthermore, it is not known whether the prevalence of vertebral fractures differs between urban and rural areas or between mountain areas and plain country, e.g. due to possible differences in sun exposure (vitamin D production) and/ or in physical activity and/ or dietary habits.

Clinical signs and symptoms leading to the suspicion of vertebral fracture(s) lack either sensitivity (wall-occiput distance) or specificity (rib-pelvis distance). Whether a combination of both would improve sensitivity and specificity is unknown.

The gold standard for the diagnosis of vertebral fracture relies on antero-posterior and lateral X-Rays of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Despite standardization of X-Ray readings, a retrospective study of hospitalized elderly patients has shown that as many as 50% of the radiographic reports failed to note the presence of moderate to severe vertebral fractures. In a primary care setting, fewer than 2% of the women received diagnoses of osteoporosis or vertebral fracture, although expected prevalence is 20% to 30% and appropriate drug treatment was offered to only 36% of the diagnosed patients.

The recent availability of software for vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) coupled to DXA measurements allows for the detection of vertebral deformities, which is critical for management of osteoporosis, as the existence of such deformities substantially increases the risk of subsequent fracture. Recently published results show that VFA allows the diagnosis of a vertebral fracture. The sensitivity of VFA for detection of vertebral fractures compared to expert radiologist reading of X-ray is excellent for grade 2 and 3 fractures, ranging between 90-94%.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Examinations

  • Community-dwelling women from a random sample (address lists may be chosen from public and/ or private providers)
  • Aged 65-79 yrs
  • Written informed consent

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

303

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Davos-Wolfgang, Switzerland, CH-7265
        • Hochgebirgsklinik Davos
      • Olten, Switzerland, CH-4600
        • Kantonsspital Olten
      • Tafers, Switzerland, CH-1712
        • HFR Tafers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 79 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be based on a representative (age categories, urban vs. rural, plain vs. mountain) stratified random sample taken from the general population of women living in urban/ suburban and country/ mountain regions (stratified for n = one third each, based on city code) in the german speaking part of Switzerland.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-dwelling women from a random sample (address lists may be chosen from public and/ or private providers)
  • Aged 65-79 yrs
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent spine surgery
  • Not willing or not able to sign informed consent
  • In patients not willing or not able to participate, the reason for denial will be recorded for future evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Prevalence of vertebral fractures in community dwelling Swiss women aged 65-79 years
Time Frame: at the only study visit
at the only study visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for the prediction of underlying vertebral fracture of selected risk factors, clinical signs and vitamin D level, alone or in combination
Time Frame: at the only study visit
at the only study visit
Assessment of the percentage of women correctly identified with a vertebral fracture and adequately treated for underlying osteoporosis and
Time Frame: at the only study visit
at the only study visit
Assessment of the differences between these women and those who are either not correctly diagnosed or not correctly treated
Time Frame: at the only study visit
at the only study visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kurt Lippuner, Prof. Dr., Interessengemeinschaft Osteoporose

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 9, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Fractures

3
Subscribe