Trial of Positive Deviance in Inpatient Wards to Reduce Hospital Infections

Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are a significant public health burden. Even with existence of recommendations on technical strategies to prevent these infections, there is a need for strategies to increase staff engagement within the local organizational and cultural context. Positive deviance is one such approach that engages people in improvement efforts. Positive Deviance is based on the observation that in every community there are certain individuals or groups whose uncommon behaviors and strategies enable them to find better solutions to problems than their peers, while having access to the same resources and facing similar or worse challenges. In the proposed study, the investigators plan to test the effectiveness of using positive deviance based horizontal infection prevention approach to achieve overall reduction of HAIs among hospital inpatients. The investigators hypothesized that a broad and horizontal approach to reduce opportunities for acquisition of nosocomial pathogens using PD will lead to greater reduction of HAI among hospital inpatients compared to standard-of-care infection control approach. The investigators objective was to test the investigators hypothesis and evaluate whether there is greater decline in rate of HAI in the experimental group of wards compared to the control group of wards.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Objective: To evaluate whether positive deviance (PD) based horizontal infection prevention approach will result in a higher rate of decline in incidence density of patients with HAI (central line-associated bloodstream infection, healthcare-associated pneumonia, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, or Clostridium difficile infection) per 1000 patient days per month in the intervention wards compared to control wards.

Design: A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted over a period of 24 months. Six medical wards were randomized and positive deviance intervention was randomly allocated to one of the two groups of three wards each. The baseline, intervention and follow-up periods were 6, 9 and 9 months respectively.

Setting: A public safety-net major teaching hospital in United States.

Participants: The ward staffs participated in the intervention.

Intervention: Key components of the intervention were invitation to participate voluntarily, open-ended dialogues with staff members to discover barriers and seek solutions to prevent HAI, discussion of outcomes, and encouragement to prioritize and implement the solutions generated. Staffs of all six wards were asked to voluntarily participate in a modified hospital survey of patient safety climate (HSOPSC) and a social network survey at 6, 15, and 24 months.

Statistical analysis: Statistical methods used were time series modeling, summary of frequencies, Chi-square or Fisher's exact for testing difference in proportions and t-test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16876

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

The intervention was performed on the staff members providing care in the three wards belonging to the intervention arm of the study. These staff members were invited to participate in the positive deviance intervention on a voluntary and anonymous basis.

The primary outcome was measured in all the patients who received care in the three intervention wards and the three control wards.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For Intervention: All staff members employed in the study wards assigned to the intervention arm.
  • For Primary Outcome Assessment:

    • All patients admitted to any of the six study wards included in the study over the 24-month study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

-None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Positive Deviance Intervention Arm
Three hospital wards received Positive Deviance intervention.
The recipients of the Positive Deviance intervention are the staff members of the three wards in the intervention arm, while the outcomes are measured among the patients receiving care in the three wards in the intervention arm. Key components of the intervention were invitation to participate voluntarily, open-ended dialogues with staff members to discover barriers and seek solutions to prevent HAI, discussion of outcomes, and encouragement to prioritize and implement the solutions generated.
Standard-of-Care Infection Control approach
Other: Control Arm
Three hospital wards randomized to control arm received the Standard-of-Care Infection Control approach.
Standard-of-Care Infection Control approach

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of HAI per 1000 patient-days per month.
Time Frame: 24 Months
The primary study outcome is the incidence density of HAI [a composite of central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and C.difficile infection (CDI)] per 1000 patient-days per month.
24 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pranavi Sreeramoju, MD, UT Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU 072011-079
  • Grant # 137911 (Other Identifier: University of Texas System Patient Safety)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthcare-associated Infections

Clinical Trials on Positive Deviance

Subscribe