Clinical Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Chronic Troublesome Drooling Associated With Neurological Disorders and/or Intellectual Disability (SIPEXI)

August 6, 2021 updated by: Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH

Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study With an Open-label Extension Period to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 in the Treatment of Children and Adolescents (2-17 Years) With Chronic Troublesome Sialorrhea Associated With Neurological Disorders, and/or Intellectual Disability

The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of NT 201 compared with placebo for the treatment of chronic troublesome sialorrhea associated with neurological disorders (e.g. cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury) and/or intellectual disability in children and adolescents naïve to Botulinum neurotoxin treatment and aged 2-17 years.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

256

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kobuleti, Georgia, 6200
        • Merz Investigational Site #9950003
      • Tbilisi, Georgia, 0159
        • Merz Investigational Site #9950001
      • Tbilisi, Georgia, 0159
        • Merz Investigational Site #9950002
      • Balassagyarmat, Hungary, 2660
        • Merz Investigational Site #0360017
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1083
        • Merz Investigational Site #0360013
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1125
        • Merz Investigational Site # 0360014
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1125
        • Merz Investigational Site # 0360015
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1146
        • Merz Investigational Site #0360018
      • Szombathely, Hungary, 9700
        • Merz Investigational Site #0360016
      • Bialystok, Poland, 15-274
        • Merz Investigational Site #0480092
      • Gdansk, Poland, 80-952
        • Merz Investigational Site #0480090
      • Katowice, Poland, 40-954
        • Merz Investigational Site #0480076
      • Krakow, Poland, 30-359
        • Merz Investigational Site #0480059
      • Wiazowna, Poland, 05-462
        • Merz Investigational Site #0480060
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012
        • Merz Investigational Site #0070016
      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650066
        • Merz Investigational Site # 0070288
      • Khabarovsk, Russian Federation, 680038
        • Merz Investigational Site #0070290
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194100
        • Merz Investigational # 0070017
      • Smolensk, Russian Federation, 214018
        • Merz Investigational Site #0070013
      • Stavropol, Russian Federation, 355029
        • Merz Investigational Site # 070019
      • Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634052
        • Merz Investigational Site #0070300
      • Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620149
        • Merz Investigational Site #0070301
      • Belgrade, Serbia, 11040
        • Merz Investigational Site #3810001
      • Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, 49027
        • Merz Investigational Site #3800001
      • Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76014
        • Merz Investigational Site #3800012
      • Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61068
        • Merz Investigational Site #3800005
      • Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61153
        • Merz Investigational Site #3800007
      • Kherson, Ukraine, 73010
        • Merz Investigational Site #3800013
      • Odesa, Ukraine, 65012
        • Merz Investigational site #3800003
      • Ternopil, Ukraine, 46020
        • Merz Investigational Site #3800009
      • Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine, 69063
        • Merz Investigational Site #3800011

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female child/adolescent age 2-17 years.
  • Any neurological disorder (e.g. cerebral palsy or traumatic brain injury) and/or intellectual disability associated with chronic troublesome sialorrhea for at least 3 months up to the screening. In subjects with intellectual disability (ID) without neurological disorders, a diagnosis of ID by a specialist, e.g. pediatrician or by a center for developmental medicine is required for inclusion.
  • Severe drooling (modified Teacher´s Drooling Scale [mTDS] ≥ 6; clothing occasionally becomes damp) as rated by the investigator.
  • Parental consent and the subject's oral or written assent as the subject is able to provide.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic troublesome sialorrhea not related to neurological disorders and/or intellectual disability.
  • Body weight < 12 kg.
  • Pharmacological treatment for sialorrhea or concomitant medication known to influence sialorrhea strongly (e.g. anticholinergics with exception of locally applied or short acting drugs used under general anesthesia) within 45 days before baseline and during the entire study period.
  • Any previous known or suspected hypersensitivity to Botulinum toxin.
  • Aspiration pneumonia within 6 month before screening.
  • Any previous treatment with Botulinum toxin for any body region during the year before screening or within the screening period
  • Prior, concomitant or planned surgery or irradiation to head and neck to control sialorrhea (including salivary gland surgery or salivary gland irradiation) within one year before screening or planned for any part of the entire study period.
  • Concurrent diseases, including hematological, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, musculoskeletal, or psychiatric diseases or conditions, which in the judgment of the investigator would put the subject at risk while in the study, could influence the results of the study, or negatively impact the subject's ability to participate in the study.
  • Extremely poor dental and/or oral condition that might preclude safe study participation by the judgment of the investigator.
  • Nursing mother or pregnant female subject.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Double-blind MP: Placebo (Age 6 to 17 Years)
Participants will receive placebo via bilateral intraglandular injection into the parotid and submandibular glands in one injection session on Day 1 (Visit 2) of the MP, followed by an observation period of 16 weeks. Volumes will be matched to the volumes of NT 201 (incobotulinumtoxinA; Xeomin) injected in the experimental arm.
NT 201 placebo matching injection.
Experimental: Double-blind, MP: NT 201 (Age 6 to 17 Years)
Participants will receive NT 201 (up to 2.5 Units per kilogram [U/kg] body weight) via bilateral intraglandular injection into the parotid and submandibular glands in one injection session on Day 1 (Visit 2) of the MP, followed by an observation period of 16 weeks.
NT 201 injection.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
  • IncobotulinumtoxinA
Experimental: Open-label, MP: NT 201 (Age 2 to 5 Years)
Participants will receive NT 201 (about 1.5-2 U/kg body weight) via bilateral intraglandular injection into the parotid and submandibular glands in one injection session on Day 1 (Visit 2) of the MP, followed by an observation period of 16 weeks.
NT 201 injection.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
  • IncobotulinumtoxinA
Experimental: OLEX: NT 201 (Age 6 to 17 Years)
Participants will receive NT 201 (up to 2.5 U/kg body weight) via bilateral intraglandular injection into the parotid and submandibular glands on Day 1 of second (Visit 6), third (Visit 10), and fourth (Visit 14) injection cycle of the OLEX, followed by an observation period of 16 weeks each (48 weeks in total). This arm will consist of participants who will participate in MP arms "Double-blind, MP: placebo (age 6 to 17 years)" and "Double-blind, MP: NT 201 (age 6 to 17 years)".
NT 201 injection.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
  • IncobotulinumtoxinA
Experimental: OLEX: NT 201 (Age 2 to 5 Years)
Participants will receive NT 201 (about 1.5-2 U/kg body weight) via bilateral intraglandular injection into the parotid and submandibular glands on Day 1 of second (Visit 6), third (Visit 10), and fourth (Visit 14) injection cycle of the OLEX, followed by an observation period of 16 weeks each (48 weeks in total).
NT 201 injection.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin
  • Botulinum toxin type A (150 kiloDalton), free from complexing proteins
  • IncobotulinumtoxinA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (uSFR) at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 4
This endpoint was planned to be analyzed in double-blind, MP, 6 to 17 years participants only. uSFR was assessed by weighing of absorbent swabs with safety threads soaked with saliva over 5 minutes and the procedure was repeated after 30 minutes. Salivary flow rate was equal to weight increase of swabs/time of collection. The average of the 2 results for flow rate was calculated. The reduction of measured weight over the study relates to improvement of sialorrhea.
Baseline and Week 4
Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) at Week 4 Assessed by the Carer/Parent(s)
Time Frame: Week 4
This endpoint was analyzed in double-blind, MP, 6 to 17 years participants. The GICS was used to measure the carer's/parent's impression of change due to treatment. The response option was a common 7-point Likert scale, with the following values: +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (minimally improved); 0 (no change); -1 (minimally worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse).
Week 4
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Overall and Per Injection Cycle
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 64
Baseline up to Week 64

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in uSFR at Weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
This endpoint was analyzed in double-blind, MP, 6 to 17 years participants. uSFR was assessed by weighing of absorbent swabs with safety threads soaked with saliva over 5 minutes and then procedure was repeated after 30 minutes. Salivary flow rate was equal to weight increase of swabs/time of collection. The average of the 2 results for flow rate was calculated. The reduction of measured weight over the study relates to improvement of sialorrhea.
Baseline and Weeks 8 and 12
GICS at Weeks 8 and 12
Time Frame: Weeks 8 and 12
This endpoint was analyzed in double-blind, MP, 6 to 17 years participants. The GICS was used to measure the carer's/parent's impression of change due to treatment. The response option was a common 7-point Likert scale with the following values: +3 (very much improved); +2 (much improved); +1 (minimally improved); 0 (no change); -1 (minimally worse); -2 (much worse); -3 (very much worse).
Weeks 8 and 12
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) Overall and by Injection Cycle
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 64
Baseline up to Week 64
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) Overall and by Injection Cycle
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 64
Baseline up to Week 64
Occurrence of TEAEs Related to Treatment as Assessed by the Investigator Overall and by Injection Cycle
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 64
Baseline up to Week 64
Occurrence of TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation Overall and by Injection Cycle
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 64
Baseline up to Week 64

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 9, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on NT 201 Placebo

Subscribe