Comprehensive Cardiac CT Versus Exercise Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (2) (CRESCENT2)

August 3, 2016 updated by: Koen Nieman, Erasmus Medical Center
Multi-center, randomized-controlled trial comparing a comprehensive cardiac CT protocol with standard stress testing in patients with stable chest pain complaints.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rationale: CT calcium and coronary lumen imaging allow efficient exclusion of coronary artery disease (CAD), but cannot assess the hemodynamic significance of obstructive findings. Addition of stress myocardial perfusion imaging, which assesses the functional relevance of coronary narrowing, completes the non-invasive cardiac evaluation.

Hypothesis: A comprehensive cardiac CT examination will allow fast, accurate and complete evaluation of suspected CAD.

Objective: evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of comprehensive cardiac CT workup of suspected CAD.

Study design: Open-labelled, randomized-controlled, clinical efficiency trial, with an intention-to-diagnose approach, between CT-guided management and the current standard of care (based on functional testing of provocable myocardial ischemia) in patients with suspected CAD.

Study population: 250 patients (>18 yrs) with stable chest complaints, a >10% pre-test probability of CAD, and referred for evaluation of possible CAD.

Intervention: Instead of the usual diagnostic approach, patients in the intervention group will undergo in sequence the following CT examinations: coronary calcium scan, coronary CT angiography and CT myocardial perfusion imaging, with completion dependent on results. Findings on CT will direct further management.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary: Rate of negative invasive angiograms (as percentage of total population) Secondary: Diagnostic yield, chest complaints, quality of life, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, overall costs and adverse events at 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dordrecht, Netherlands, 3318 AT
        • Albert Schweizerzieknhuis
      • Maastricht, Netherlands, 6229 HX
        • Maastricht University Medical Center
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015CE
        • Erasmus MC
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Maasstadziekenhuis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged >18 years.
  • Chest pain symptoms suspicious of coronary heart disease.
  • Pre-test probability of coronary artery disease >10%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of CAD: prior myocardial infarction or revascularization procedure
  • Contra-indication to radiation exposure (CT/SPECT): pregnancy
  • Contra-indication to iodine contrast media: renal failure, iodine allergy
  • Contra-indications to adenosine
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Comprehensive cardiac CT

Tiered cardiac CT protocol:

  1. CT calcium scan
  2. CT angiography (if calcium scan positive or high pre-test probability)
  3. CT perfusion (if >50% stenosis on CTA, or cannot be ruled out)
CT-guided management
No Intervention: Standard care
Standard diagnostic management of suspected CAD, using stress testing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of negative invasive angiograms (as percentage of total population)
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of performed invasive angiograms with no CAD requiring intervention
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chest pain complaints
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients experiencing symptoms of chest pain
6 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
Questionnaire based quality of life score
6 months
Major adverse event rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, urgent revascularizations, CVA
6 months
Radiation exposure
Time Frame: 6 months
Cumulative radiation dose from diagnostic and therapeutic interventions
6 months
Number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures
6 months
Medical expenses
Time Frame: 6 months
All medical expenses related to the diagnosis and treatment of suspected CAD
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Koen Nieman, MD, PhD, Erasmus Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 4, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Cardiac CT scan

Subscribe