Evaluation of Fluorescence-image Guided Wound Assessment vs. Standard Practice

February 12, 2018 updated by: Ralph DaCosta, University Health Network, Toronto
The current trial aims to compare the assessment of diabetic foot ulcers by fluorescence image guidance to standard practice. The device will be used to acquire fluorescence images of diabetic foot ulcers: when wounds are illuminated by violet/blue light, most pathogenic bacterial species emit a unique red fluorescence signal. The device is intended to be used as part of the clinical assessment process, which may include visual assessment, signs of heat or high temperature, the presence of exudate, and redness in the area. Images will guide the clinician to inspect, sample or further evaluate areas where fluorescing bacteria is present. This study will allow us to determine the benefit of fluorescence image-guided procedure as compared to standard clinical practice to assess bacterial burden in diabetic foot ulcers. Microbiological swabbing under standard practice and fluoresce-guided imaging will be performed in order to compare the two techniques.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Chronic wounds and their associated care are a burden to patients and health care systems worldwide. Microbiological testing of wound samples is often used to identify and quantify bacterial species, the latter of which may be both an objective quantitative indicator of infection and a predictive correlate of healing. Microbiology reports contain useful information about microbial identities, antibiotic susceptibility, and semi-quantitative bacterial growth rates, but these data typically represent the bacterial load in the wound centre only, and often arrive 3-5 days later. There is an unmet clinical need to improve the microbiological sampling and treatment of wound infections. To address this need, we developed a handheld portable imaging device that obtains white light (WL) and fluorescence (FL) images (or video) of normal skin and wounds in high-resolution and in real-time, which can be used at the point-of-care. It was demonstrated in previous studies that the device1) provides image-guidance for tissue sampling, detecting clinically-significant levels of pathogenic bacteria and wound infection otherwise overlooked by conventional sampling and 2) provides image-guidance for wound treatment, accelerating wound closure compared with conventional therapies and quantitatively tracking long-term changes in bacterial bioburden and distribution in wounds.

The current trial aims to compare the assessment of diabetic foot ulcers by fluorescence image guidance to standard practice. The device will be used to acquire fluorescence images of diabetic foot ulcers: when wounds are illuminated by violet/blue light, most pathogenic bacterial species emit a unique red fluorescence signal. The device is intended to be used as part of the clinical assessment process, which may include visual assessment, signs of heat or high temperature, the presence of exudate, and redness in the area. Images will guide the clinician to inspect, sample or further evaluate areas where fluorescing bacteria is present. This study will allow us to determine the benefit of fluorescence image-guided procedure as compared to standard clinical practice to assess bacterial burden in diabetic foot ulcers. Microbiological swabbing under standard practice and fluoresce-guided imaging will be performed in order to compare the two techniques.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2R1N5
        • Judy Dan Research and Treatment Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who present with a diabetic foot ulcer and are receiving standard wound care treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female who present with a diabetic foot ulcer and are receiving standard wound care treatment.
  • 18 years and older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with an investigational drug within 1 month before study enrolment
  • Inability to consent
  • Any contra-indication to routine wound care and/or monitoring

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Diabetic foot ulcers
Patients who present with diabetic foot ulcers will undergo fluorescence imaging.
Wounds will be imaged using violet light (405 nm) illumination to locate areas with bacterial presence to guide swabbing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation of localized fluorescence signals in acquired images with microbiological samples
Time Frame: At study visit (only one study visit)
Microbiological swabs will be taking from fluorescence positive regions to correlate with bacterial presence
At study visit (only one study visit)
Comparison of number/variety of bacteria obtained by fluorescence-guided sampling vs. standard practice
Time Frame: At study visit (only one study visit)
Microbiological swabs will be taking from the wound using standard practice and following fluorescence-image guidance
At study visit (only one study visit)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the clinical functionality of the K2 Imaging Device
Time Frame: At study visit (only one study visit)
Users feedback
At study visit (only one study visit)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ralph S DaCosta, PhD, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Foot Ulcer, Diabetic

Clinical Trials on Fluorescence Imaging

Subscribe