ICG-Based Fluorescence Imaging for Intra-operative Detection of Endometriosis

March 6, 2019 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

The Use of Indocyanine Green-Based Fluorescence Imaging for Intraoperative Detection of Peritoneal Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common disease for which the current gold standard for diagnosis is a diagnostic laparoscopy with histologic confirmation. However, during the diagnostic laparoscopy endometriotic lesions are hard to identify due to the many appearances of endometriosis. Our hypothesis is that the use of intra-operative near infrared fluorescence imaging will provide real time image enhancement for the detection of endometriotic lesions by using the different vasculature in the endometriotic lesions. This hypothesis will be tested in a prospective study with 15 patients scheduled for an elective diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected endometriosis.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6202
        • Maastricht University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic surgery in which endometriosis is suspected
  • Able to understand the nature of the study and what will be required of them
  • Females
  • Age >18years
  • Premenopausal
  • No history of impaired liver and renal function
  • No history of hypersensitivity or allergy to indocyanine green or iodide
  • No hyper-thyroidism or autonomic thyroid adenomas
  • Willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to give written informed consent
  • Males
  • Aged < 18 years
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to indocyanine green or iodide
  • Known hyper-thyroidism or autonomic thyroid adenomas
  • Not willing to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NIRF imaging
After the white light (WL) imaging, NIRF imaging will be performed. 2.5 mg of ICG will be administered i.v. up to 5 times if needed. The lesions identified in WL, are inspected in NIRF mode. The surgeon indicated whether the lesions are more easily identified in WL or the NIRF mode and scores the visibility on a 1-10 scale. Next, inspection will take place for lesions that are seen in NIRF mode but not in WL. Biopsies will be taken from the lesions and from normal tissue for reference and sent for histology. Evaluation will take place whether the lesions differ in histological characteristics
By using a fluorescence imaging device (with an adapted light source and camera), a fluorescent dye can be made visible. By injecting the fluorescent dye intravenously, the vascularization will be visible. Thereby, structures with altered vascularization are expected to 'light up' differently than the surrounding.
Other Names:
  • Near infrared fluorescence imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of detected endometriotic lesions with Near Infrared Light versus with white light
Time Frame: during surgery
The number of lesions detected in near-infrared light will be compared to the number of endometriotic lesions seen in white light. Hereby, we aim to investigate whether all lesions seen in white light are also seen in NIRF light and whether NIRF light shows endometriotic lesions that were not visible in white light.
during surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Histological assessment of taken biopsies: assessment of localization of ICG uptake
Time Frame: biopsies taken during surgery, which are assessed during the 1th week after surgery
Hereby, we aim to investigate whether the different histological subtypes of endometriosis light up differently in NIRF light. We interested in whether there is another localisation of ICG uptake at cellular level in the different histological subtypes.
biopsies taken during surgery, which are assessed during the 1th week after surgery
Time measurement
Time Frame: during the laparoscopic procedure
measuring the total operating time, and the extra time needed for fluorescence imaging
during the laparoscopic procedure
Safety of the procedure: assessment of complications during the procedure attributable to the technique or dye
Time Frame: during surgery
Complications during the diagnostic laparoscopy attributable to the imaging technique or dye are described here.
during surgery
Satisfaction of the surgeon with the technique
Time Frame: immediately after surgery
Immediately the surgeon will be asked whether he/she considered the use of NIRF imaging an useful additive to the procedure.
immediately after surgery
Histological assessment of taken biopsies: assessment Target to background ratio
Time Frame: biopsies taken during surgery, which are assessed during the 1th week after surgery
The biopsies taken during surgery will be analysed together with the video recordings. Hereby, we aim to investigate whether the different histological subtypes of endometriosis light up differently in NIRF light. We interested in whether there is another target to background rato in the different histological subtypes.
biopsies taken during surgery, which are assessed during the 1th week after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurents Stassen, M.D, Ph.D, Maastricht University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL54458.068.15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometriosis

Clinical Trials on NIRF imaging

Subscribe