Deep Neuromuscular Relaxation in Patients for Thoraco-laparoscopic Esophagectomy (DEPTH)

A Randomized Controlled Double-blinded Trial Comparing the Effect of on Demand vs Deep Neuromuscular Relaxation on Rating of Surgical and Anesthesia Conditions in Patients Undergoing Thoraco-laparoscopic Esophagectomy

Rationale: Endoscopic (thoraco-laparoscopic) esophageal surgery is a high risk procedure where the use of deep neuromuscular block (NMB) may increase field visibility and anaesthesia conditions. Under these conditions, boluses of muscle relaxants can be given on indication only OR by continuous infusion. We hypothesize that deep NMB by continuous infusion of rocuronium as compared to on demand bolus administration facilitates surgical and anesthesia conditions during thoraco-laparoscopic esophageal resection but higher doses of sugammadex are needed to reverse NMB at the end of surgery.

Objective: Primary objective is to evaluate the use of deep muscle relaxation versus on indication only on surgical and anesthesia conditions in patients for endoscopic esophageal resection. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the (hypothetical) dose of sugammadex needed in both groups in an economical perspective and to compare the intra-operative cardiac and respiratory incidents and post-operative complication rate of both groups.

Study design: a single-center randomized controlled double-blinded intervention study.

Study population: All patients > 18 years to undergo a thoracolaparoscopic esophageal resection.I Intervention: Patients are randomized to receive either continuous infusion of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg/hr (group 1) or continuous infusion of NaCl 0.9% 0.06 ml/kg/hr (group 2). On demand boluses of Rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg can be given in both groups.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome parameter of this study is the SRS during the abdominal phase of thoracolaparoscopic esophageal surgery. Secondary outcomes measured are SRS during the thoracic phase, the number of on demand boluses infused, the dose of Sugammadex needed in both groups to reach a TOF of > 90%, duration of surgery, a cost-analysis, the incidence of intra-operative cardiac and respiratory incidents and the ability of surgeons to estimate which neuromuscular blocking regime was given to the patient.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Academic Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients, undergoing elective thoraco-laparoscopic esophageal resection (either Ivor Lewis or McKeown variant)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • Known allergies for aminosteroid-type muscle relaxants or sugammadex.
  • Severe kidney dysfunction (GFR < 30), patients on dialysis
  • Liver function disorders
  • Myasthenia Gravis or other (neuro)muscular diseases
  • Patients with carcinomatosis
  • Use of anti-epileptics and lithium or drugs containing Kinin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: deep neuromuscular relaxation
continuous infusion of rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg/hr (group 1). On demand bolus rocuronium can be given if demanded by anesthesiologist or surgeon
Rocuronium given continuously to reach deep neuromuscular block
Other Names:
  • Esmeron
No Intervention: on demand neuromuscular relaxation
continuous infusion of NaCl 0.9% 0.06 ml/kg/hr (group 2) On demand bolus of Rocuronium will be given when demanded by anesthesiologist or surgeon.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rating of surgical conditions (SRS) during the abdominal phase of the operation.
Time Frame: during operation
during operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rating of SRS during thoracic phase of the operation.
Time Frame: during operation
during operation
Number of on demand boluses infused, indication of on demand bolus administration
Time Frame: during operation
during operation
Rating of anesthesia conditions
Time Frame: during operation
peak and mean respiratory pressure, incidence peak insufflation pressure >35 mmHg. Depth of NBM at the end of surgery. Time until spontaneous breathing, time until extubation. Peroperative cardiac and respiratory incidents, peroperative surgical complications.Tiem to reversal of NMB, % of recurarisation
during operation
Costs (euro's) associated with use of Rocuronium, Sugammadex, operation time and length of stay ICU.
Time Frame: during operation and an average of 4 weeks thereafter
amount of rocuronium used (mg); Dose of sugammadex needed (mg), duration of surgery, hypothetical need for post-operative ventilation if sugammadex would not be available(%).
during operation and an average of 4 weeks thereafter
Number of correct estimates of group randomization by surgeons
Time Frame: directly after operation
Surgeons will guess in which group the patient was randomized (%) and the reason for this choice will be registrated. Accordingly we can estimate whether the surgeons complaints of inadequate NMB are justified and additionally, the chance of bias affecting main outcome parameter.
directly after operation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
length of stay ICU/PACU
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
need for re-intubation
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
post-operative surgical complications
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
VAS-scores
Time Frame: 24-hours post operation
24-hours post operation
Abdominal and thoracic insufflation pressures
Time Frame: During operation
During operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Markus W Hollmann, prof, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • Principal Investigator: Denise P Veelo, MD, PhD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014-211
  • 2014-002147-18 (EudraCT Number)
  • MISP51412 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Merck Sharp & Dohme BV)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Rocuronium

3
Subscribe