Technology and Human Help at Home After Hospitalisation (T4H)

May 24, 2017 updated by: Ages et Vies Association

Technology and Human Help at Home After Hospitalisation (T4H): a Randomized Clustered Controlled Trial

Elderly people are still at risk for falling at home. The objective of the study is to evaluate at home the impact of an intervention for 3 months combining technologies for autonomy and tailored physical activity program. The study is performed among patients aged 75 years and over leaving Charles Foix Geriatrics hospital or already supported by carer of professional home-care service Ages & Vie and with a loss of autonomy requiring physiotherapy and home support workers. It is a prospective, randomized, single-center, in cluster study which compares a Patient group (interventional group) with the intervention program (technologies + physical activities) with a control group benefiting from usual care home. Our hypothesis is that in the interventional group fewer falls were observed and improved different scores (Timed Up and Go Test,Barthel index, Quality of Life questionnaire of Duke) were reported compared to the control group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ivry sur Seine, France, 94205
        • AP-HP Charles Foix

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients hospitalized in Charles Foix Hospital (France) and returning home or already supported by carer of professional home-care service Ages & Vie
  • > 75 years old with loss of autonomy
  • at risk for falling
  • able to read and understand the information letter and consent letter
  • patient requiring physiotherapy and caregiver at home.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Interventionnal arm
Interventional arm : patients at home with technologies for autonomy and tailored physical activity program.
At home patients have both technologies for autonomy (walkers, treadmill) and tailored physical activity program performed with the help of the home carer. Intervention takes 3 months. Assessment at hospital discharge et at 3 months.
No Intervention: Control arm
Control arm : patients with usual care home

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of falls
Time Frame: 3 months
absence of fall requiring medical or paramedical care and improvement of the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) or improvement of the autonomy level assessed by Barthel Index with at least stability of the test that is not improved
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Timed up and Go test score
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Barthel index
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Duke questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Meziere Anthony, Dr, Hôpital Charles Foix, AP-HP

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Fall

Clinical Trials on Interventional arm

Subscribe