Efficacy and Safety of Low Amplitude Electroconvulsive Therapy

March 21, 2017 updated by: Duke University
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of low amplitude electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to reduce, and possibly eliminate the side effects of ECT by lowering the strength of the ECT stimulus from the conventional 800 mA to 500 mA. Low amplitude ECT could potentially reduce the risks associated with ECT while preserving its unparalleled efficacy. This novel development would remove key obstacles to allow for the wider adoption of ECT as a safe and effective therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • DukeUMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and female subjects, age 18-70
  2. DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of major depressive episode in unipolar or bipolar disorder, confirmed by the MINI-PLUS
  3. MMSE total score > 26
  4. Referred for ECT
  5. Competent to provide informed consent
  6. Able to read or comprehend English

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lifetime history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, mental retardation
  2. Current neurostimulation treatment (e.g., ECT, magnetic seizure therapy, transcranial magnetic stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation)
  3. Current alcohol abuse or dependence within past 6 months
  4. Current substance abuse or dependence within past 6 months
  5. History of central nervous system (CNS) disease
  6. Current diagnosis of dementia or delirium
  7. MoCA total score < 26
  8. Current visual, auditory, or motor impairment that compromises ability to complete evaluations
  9. Patients with intracranial implants
  10. MRI contraindications: pregnancy, implanted metal, and claustrophobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 500 mA ECT
Right unilateral, ultra brief pulse ECT, with 500 mA current amplitude
Active Comparator: 800 mA ECT
Right unilateral, ultra brief pulse ECT, with 800 mA current amplitude

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in California Verbal Learning Test-II
Time Frame: Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-item
Time Frame: Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Change in Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Clinician Rated and Self Report
Time Frame: Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Change in Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised
Time Frame: Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Change in Autobiographical Memory Interview Test
Time Frame: Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Change in Delis Kaplan Executive Function System
Time Frame: Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Change in Trail Making Test Part A
Time Frame: Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Change in Grooved Pegboard test
Time Frame: Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session
Baseline and within 24 to 48 hours of each ECT session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00058639

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on MECTA Spectrum 5000Q

Subscribe