Enhancing the Effectiveness of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Severe Depression (EFFECT-Dep)

April 22, 2018 updated by: Prof Declan McLoughlin, St Patrick's Hospital, Ireland

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Standard Bilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus High-dose Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy for Severe Depression

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most powerful antidepressant treatment available and is often life-saving. There are concerns, however, that standard bitemporal ECT (the most commonly used form of ECT worldwide) causes persisting retrograde amnesia. However, clinical trials have indicated that high-dose unilateral ECT may be as effective as bitemporal ECT but have much less cognitive side-effects.

The trial aims to test the primary experimental hypothesis: High-dose (6 x ST) right unilateral ECT is as effective as (i.e. not inferior to) standard (1.5 x ST) bitemporal ECT for severe depression in terms of Hamilton Depression Rating Score (HDRS) at the end of the treatment course.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study is a two-group parallel design randomised controlled non-inferiority trial and has been registered (ISRCTN23577151). Consented patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV) will be randomly allocated to a course of bitemporal (BT) ECT (1.5 x ST) or high-dose right unilateral (RUL) ECT (6.0 x ST). To facilitate generalizability of results, the trial takes place under "real world" conditions and so both groups continue usual care and medications during the treatment phase and thereafter. Patients are followed-up for 12 months after completing their allocated course of ECT. Completion of the primary outcome depression-rating measure (i.e. HDRS) and the secondary outcome of most interest (autobiographical memory, using the AMI-SF) will be prioritised in the data collection.

Patients, their treating clinicians and raters are blind to treatment; clinicians administering ECT are not involved in post randomisation assessments or formal data analysis. Success of blinding for patients and raters will be assessed after the second and final treatments. The trial statistician is also blinded to allocation status.

Sample size: In a large series (n = 253) of depressed patients, Petrides et al. (2001) found a mean (SD) reduction in 24-item HDRS of 25.6 (9.4) after treatment with bitemporalT ECT (1.5 x ST). We therefore estimate that 69 patients will be required per treatment group to have 80% power to demonstrate, using a one-sided equivalence t-test at 5% level, that mean reduction in 24-item HDRS achieved using high-dose RUL ECT is no more than 4 points (i.e. equivalent to 3 points on 17-item HDRS) less than that achieved using standard BT ECT, assuming a common within-group SD of change scores of 9.4 and equal expected group mean change scores.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

138

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Ireland
      • Dublin, Ireland, 8
        • St Patrick's University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥18 years diagnosed with major depressive episode (DSM-IV) and referred for ECT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition rendering patients medically unfit for general anaesthesia or ECT; treatment with ECT in previous six months; dementia or other Axis 1 diagnosis; alcohol/other substance abuse in previous six months; inability/refusal to consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
Modified bilateral ECT (bitemporal electrode positions) twice weekly at 1.5 times the seizure threshold. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0mg/kg) for muscle relaxation.
Device: ECT Mecta 5000M
ECT is administered twice weekly with hand-held electrodes using the Mecta 5000M device following a standard stimulus dosing protocol. Seizure duration is measured by EEG monitoring. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg) as muscle relaxant. Seizure threshold (ST) is established by a method of limits at the first session and subsequent treatments will be given at 1.5 x ST for BT ECT and 6.0 x ST for RUL ECT. To reflect routine clinical practice, number of ECT treatments is determined by referring physicians who will be blind to randomisation. The treatment period varies between patients to allow up to 12 administrations of ECT, i.e. up to 6 weeks.
Other Names:
  • electroconvulsive therapy Mecta 500M device
Drug: Methohexitone
Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia along with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)for muscle relaxation. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.
Other Names:
  • methohexital
  • Brevimytal (Hikma, Germany)
Drug: Suxamethonium
Suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)is used for muscle relaxation along with Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) for anaesthesia. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.
Other Names:
  • Succinylcholine
  • Anectine (GlaxoSmithKline, UK)
Experimental: High-dose unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
High-dose right modified unilateral ECT twice weekly at 6 times the seizure threshold. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0mg/kg) for muscle relaxation.
Device: ECT Mecta 5000M
ECT is administered twice weekly with hand-held electrodes using the Mecta 5000M device following a standard stimulus dosing protocol. Seizure duration is measured by EEG monitoring. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg) as muscle relaxant. Seizure threshold (ST) is established by a method of limits at the first session and subsequent treatments will be given at 1.5 x ST for BT ECT and 6.0 x ST for RUL ECT. To reflect routine clinical practice, number of ECT treatments is determined by referring physicians who will be blind to randomisation. The treatment period varies between patients to allow up to 12 administrations of ECT, i.e. up to 6 weeks.
Other Names:
  • electroconvulsive therapy Mecta 500M device
Drug: Methohexitone
Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia along with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)for muscle relaxation. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.
Other Names:
  • methohexital
  • Brevimytal (Hikma, Germany)
Drug: Suxamethonium
Suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)is used for muscle relaxation along with Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) for anaesthesia. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.
Other Names:
  • Succinylcholine
  • Anectine (GlaxoSmithKline, UK)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
Time Frame: HDRS scores were obtained at baseline, end of allocated ECT treatment, and at 3 and 6 month follow-up timepoints.
The HDRS was originally designed to assess severity of depressive symptoms in patients with a primary depressive illness and is now the most commonly used measure of depression severity. It was first published in a 17-item format with the optional addition of 4 items making up the 21-item version. In addition to the original 21 items, the 24-item HDRS includes items on helplessness, hopelessness and worthlessness; its score range is 0-77, with higher scores reflecting greater burden of depressive symptoms.
HDRS scores were obtained at baseline, end of allocated ECT treatment, and at 3 and 6 month follow-up timepoints.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)
Time Frame: end of allocated ECT course
The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..
end of allocated ECT course
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)
Time Frame: 3 months follow-up
The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..
3 months follow-up
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up
The AMI-SF is used to assess retrospective autobiographical memory function. It has six categories, which involve five questions each, about a family member, most recent travel, last New Year's Eve, last birthday, most recent employment and last visit to a doctor for a physical complaint. At baseline interviewers encourage the participant to recall as much information as they can. Responses at baseline can be scored either two points, for a recognisable real memory, or zero for no memory or too little information to constitute a proper memory. Only those questions for which a memory had been retrieved at baseline are examined at follow-up. Follow-up assessments are scored as percentage recall of baseline score, which is scored as 100% irrespective of actual performance..
6 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

St Patrick's Hospital, Ireland

Collaborators

Health Research Board, Ireland

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Declan M McLoughlin, PhD, St Patrick's University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

July 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TRA/2007/5
  • ISRCTN23577151 (Registry Identifier: Current Controlled Trials)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

We are continuing to analyze trial data for secondary analyses. Requests for IPD will be considered where appropriate.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on ECT Mecta 5000M

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Djibouti

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe