Electrocautery vs Q-switch for Seborrheic Keratosis

December 2, 2021 updated by: Murad Alam, Northwestern University

Comparing the Efficacy and Risk of Adverse Events of Electrocautery Versus 532 nm Qswitched Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet Laser for the Treatment of Flat Seborrheic Keratoses: A Randomized Control Trial

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and risk of adverse events of electrocautery versus 532 nm Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser for the treatment of flat seborrheic keratoses.

This study is a pilot study designed to determine feasibility of these procedures.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects are Caucasian or Asian.
  2. Subjects who are between 18-65 year olds.
  3. Subjects have flat or macular seborrheic keratosis on dorsum of the hands and wrists, extensor surfaces of the forearms. The diagnosis of flat seborrheic keratosis is confirmed by two clinical dermatologists using routine clinical examination and dermoscopy.
  4. Subjects have Fitzpatrick skin type I-III.
  5. Subjects are in good health.
  6. Subjects have the willingness and the ability to understand and provide informed consent and communicate with the investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of keloids or hypertrophic scars.
  2. Pregnant or lactating or intends to become pregnant in the next 3 months.
  3. Active skin disease or skin infection in the treatment area.
  4. Previous history of lidocaine allergy.
  5. History of methemoglobinemia
  6. Unable to understand the protocol or to give informed consent.
  7. Any other condition that would, in the professional opinion of the investigator, potentially affect response or participation in the clinical study or would pose as an unacceptable risk to subject.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: electrocautery
Blocks of subjects' lesions will be randomized 1:1 to receive electrocautery or 532 nm Nd:YAG laser. Prior to treatment with either electrocautery or 532nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, a topical EMLA cream will be applied to the lesions for at least 60 minutes under occlusion at the area of treatment.
Active Comparator: 532 nm Nd:YAG laser
Blocks of subjects' lesions will be randomized 1:1 to receive electrocautery or 532 nm Nd:YAG laser. Prior to treatment with either electrocautery or 532nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, a topical EMLA cream will be applied to the lesions for at least 60 minutes under occlusion at the area of treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pigmentation from baseline to week 18
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 weeks
Blinded photo raters will the lesion pigmentation on a scale of -50 (most hypopigmented relative to baseline) to +50 (most hyperpigmented relative to baseline) for both treatments.
Baseline and 18 weeks
Change in lesion texture from baseline to week 18
Time Frame: Baseline and 18 weeks
Blinded photo raters will the lesion texture on a scale of -50 (most worsening relative to baseline) to +50 (most improvement relative to baseline) for both treatments.
Baseline and 18 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU105340

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keratosis, Seborrheic

Clinical Trials on Hyfrecator

Subscribe