Simulect Versus ATG in Sensitized Renal Transplant Patient (SATIR)

April 2, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Evaluating Two Induction Therapies With Simulect® Versus ATG® Fresenius Associated With Tacrolimus and Myfortic® in the Prevention of Treatment Failure, in Sensitized Renal Transplant

Induction therapy by either T-cell depleting polyclonal antibodies such as anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG) or non-depleting anti-interleukine 2 receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD25 moAb: basiliximab or daclizumab) are used to prevent acute rejection, especially in highly sensitized patients. Both induction therapy regimens have a different tolerance profile. Infections and haematological side-effects are more frequently reported in patients receiving ATG.

The aim of the pilot study is to evaluate ATG and basiliximab induction therapy in de novo sensitized kidney-transplant patients (incompatible grafts rate ≥ 50%) without donor specific antibodies (DSAs) detected by Luminex.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Acute rejection after kidney transplantation can lead to graft loss by irreversible acute rejection or to interstitial fibrosis/ tubular atrophy that can induce graft loss. Induction therapy by either T-cell depleting polyclonal antibodies such as Anti-Thymocyte Globulins (ATG) or non-depleting anti-interleukine 2 receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti-CD25 moAb: basiliximab or daclizumab) are used to prevent acute rejection, especially in highly sensitized patients. Both induction therapy regimens have a different tolerance profile. Infections and haematological side-effects are more frequently reported in patients receiving ATG. With respect to the efficacy, no comparison exists between both induction therapy regimens in high risk immunological patients as actually defined. Within the last few years, the development of new immunological screening tools, i.e. Luminex assay, had lead to a better evaluation of the immunological status of candidates for kidney transplantation, mainly those who were considered as highly sensitized. The aim of our pilot study is to evaluate ATG and basiliximab induction therapy in de novo sensitized kidney-transplant patients (incompatible grafts rate ≥ 50%) without Donor Specific Antibodies (DSAs) detected by Luminex. Maintenance immunosuppressive regimen will be based on the combination of tacrolimus, mycophenolate sodium and steroids. The primary endpoint is a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, loss of follow up, or death at 6 months post-transplant. The secondary endpoints are the efficacy of the therapy at month 12 posttransplant, and safety parameters (CMV infection, BK virus nephropathy, haematological tolerance, Adverse Events (AE)and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)). Our hypothesis is that basiliximab induction therapy may be sufficiently effective to prevent acute rejection in sensitized patients without DSA. This may reduce the post-transplant immunosuppression-induced side-effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • France
      • Toulouse, France, France, 31059
        • UHToulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients aged from 18 to 70 years
  • Recipient of a deceased or living donor kidney transplant with the following criteria:
  • Incompatible grafts rate ≥ 50% for the last available serum before transplantation < 3 months
  • Anti-HLA antibodies positive
  • Negative DSA by luminex method on historical serum and day serum
  • T and B negative Cross match on historical and day serum
  • Females capable of becoming pregnant must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to or at screening, and are required to practice an approved and reliable method of birth control for the duration of the study and for a period of 2 months after study medication discontinuation, even where there has been a history of infertility
  • Patients who are willing and able to participate in the full course of the study and from whom written informed consent has been obtained.
  • Patients affiliated to, or recipients of, a social security system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recipients of a multi-organ transplantation, including dual kidneys, or who have previously received non renal transplanted organs
  • Recipients of a kidney from non-heart beating donor, or with ABO incompatibility against the donor or with a T positive cross match
  • Patients with severe uncontrolled systemic infection or severe allergy requiring acute or chronic treatment
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALAT) or bilirubin ≥ 3 upper limit of the normal range (ULN)
  • Known hypersensitivity or contra-indication to rabbit proteins, basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid or any of the product excipients
  • Patients who are Hepatitis C positive (positive PCR and normal hepatic test may be included), HIV positive, or Hepatitis B surface antigen positive (AgHBs).
  • Patients with thrombocytopenia < 75,000/mm3, an absolute neutrophils count < 1,500/mm3, leukocytopenia < 2,500/mm3, and/or hemoglobin < 8g/dL at inclusion visit
  • Patients with any past or present malignancy within the last five years except excised squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin and treated in situ cervix uteri cancer
  • Any surgical or medical condition, excluding transplantation which compromise the inclusion of the patient (investigator's opinion)
  • Female patients who are pregnant, breast feeding or capable to become pregnant and not wishing or capable to practice a medically approved and reliable method of birth control
  • Patients with symptoms of significant somatic or mental illness. Inability to cooperate or communicate with the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Simulect
Simulect IV 40 mg D0 and D4

Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4

and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day + Myfortic 720 to 1440mg + Corticosteroids 5mg

Other Names:
  • Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4
  • and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day +
  • Myfortic 720 to 1440mg +
  • Corticosteroids 5mg
Active Comparator: ATG Fresenius
ATG IV min dose 3 mg/ kg/ day D0, D1, D3, D5
Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4 and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day + Myfortic 720 to 1440mg + Corticosteroids 5mg
Other Names:
  • Simulect IV 40 mg/day D0 and D4
  • and oral use Tacrolimus 0.1 mg/ kg/ day +
  • Myfortic 720 to 1440mg +
  • Corticosteroids 5mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of treatment failure
Time Frame: 6 months
Incidence of treatment failure (Biopsy Proved Reject, lost to follow up, graft loss or death) at 6 months post transplantation.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
feasibility estimating the number of informed consent obtained
Time Frame: 12 months
Estimating the number of informed consent obtained
12 months
treatment efficacy
Time Frame: 12 months

Treatment failure at 12 months post transplantation.

  • premature discontinuation of study medication, discontinuation from the study and reasons.
  • incidence of all acute rejection episodes requiring an anti-T and /or anti-B antibodies treatment within 12 months post transplantation.
  • Incidence of C4d positive biopsy findings.
  • Renal function at 3, 6 and 12 months post transplantation (abbreviated MDRD, serum creatinine and adjusted Cockcroft- Gault).
12 months
adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months

Safety:

- Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events

12 months
patient enrolled in each center
Time Frame: 12 months
Estimating the number of patient enrolled in each center and by year
12 months
number of patients lost from follow-up
Time Frame: 12 months
Estimating the number of patients lost from from follow-up before 6 and before 12 months
12 months
rejection
Time Frame: 12 months

acute rejection at 6 and 12 months post transplantation

- Subclinical rejection at the 3 month per protocol renal biopsy.

12 months
Donor Specific Antibodies
Time Frame: 12 months
Donor Specific Antibodies at D0, M3 and M12.
12 months
Incidence of BKV viremia
Time Frame: 12 months
incidence of BKV viremia at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post transplantation
12 months
values of hematologia : hemoglobine, leucocytes, plaquettes, hematies, neutrophiles
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Incidence of BKV nephropathy
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of BKV nephropathy at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post transplantation
12 months
incidence of CMV post transplantation
Time Frame: 12 months
incidence of CMV(PCR) post transplantation at 6, 9 and 12 months
12 months
incidence of infections
Time Frame: 12 months
incidence of infections cancer and PTLD
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nassim Kamar, MD PhD, University Hospital, Toulouse

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

March 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Transplant Rejection

Clinical Trials on Simulect

Subscribe