The Efficacy of Electrical Version of Patient Reported Outcome

July 6, 2015 updated by: Chun Kee Chung, Seoul National University Hospital

The Efficacy of Electrical Version of Patient Reported Outcome: Patient Survey

Recently the importance of electrical PRO system is increased for the accuracy, convenience, and efficiency for both patients and physicians. For the evaluation of quality of life, various self-reported questionnaires is filled-out by the patient, mostly in front of outpatient clinic, and doctor usually take times to calculate the score. If there is electrical PRO which is available with mobile device, the efficacy of clinic would be improved. The investigators developed such a system and applied the system for patients with spinal disease. The investigators assessed the effectiveness of application of electrical-PRO in outpatients' clinic for patients who had filled-up same questionnaire in paper version.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Age, sex, education levels, use of smartphone, the number of applications.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Seoul National University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

the patients who have experienced paper questionnaire

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • We assessed the effectiveness of application of electrical-PRO in outpatients' clinic for patients who had filled-up same questionnaire in paper version

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Computer illiterate
  • Uncooperative patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Electrical version
Electrical version patient reported outcome questionnaire was used for patients who had filled-up same questionnaire in a paper version
Other: Electrical version patient reported outcome questionnaire
Assess satisfaction of patients with "electrical version patient reported outcome questionnaire".
Other Names:
  • Electrical patient reported outcome

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The necessity of electrical PRO system (quantitative analysis)
Time Frame: up to 6 months after introduction of e-PRO system

Do you feel the e-PRO system is necessary?

  1. Absolutely yes
  2. Yes
  3. No
  4. Absolutely no
up to 6 months after introduction of e-PRO system

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Consultation efficacy with doctor Satisfaction for the enough exchange of information
Time Frame: up to 6 months after introduction of e-PRO system

Do you feel the e-PRO system make the consultation time with doctor to be efficient?

  1. Absolutely yes
  2. Yes
  3. No
  4. Absolutely no

Do you think your status was expressed better with the use of e-PRO

  1. Absolutely yes
  2. Yes
  3. No
  4. Absolutely no
up to 6 months after introduction of e-PRO system

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Seoul National University Hospital

Collaborators

SK Telecom Consortium

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chun Kee Chung, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 8, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E-PRO
  • H-1207-088-418 (Other Identifier: Seouo National University Hospital)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Disease

Clinical Trials on Electrical version patient reported outcome questionnaire

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Rwanda

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe