CLE-PAD : Prevalence of PAD in Patients With Surgically Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (CLE-PAD)

March 9, 2026 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

CLE-PAD : Prevalence of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients With Surgically Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

The goal of this interventional study is to evaluate the rate of existing lower limb peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with surgically lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). PAD and LSS can present similar symptoms and it can be difficult to diagnose PAD using conventional methods, depending on the location of the arterial disease. The main questions it aims to answer are :

  • What's the prevalence of PAD in LSS patients?
  • Which exam among routine tools is the most accurate to diagnose PAD in this population? Around their surgery for LSS (a few weeks before or after), participants will be included in a vascular medicine service. After checking of eligibility criteria, they will undergo a contrast-enhanced CT scan for the diagnosis of PAD and various routine diagnostic tests: Doppler ultrasound, treadmill tests, pressure index, pulse palpation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a debilitating degenerative condition in older people associated with lower back pain, pain in the lower limbs and a reduced quality of life. LSS can be treated surgically, but the results are mixed: 35% of patients report low satisfaction one year after surgery. The symptoms of LSC in the lower limbs can mimic those associated with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The prevalence of PAD in the LSC population varies between 4.1% and 67.8% depending on the diagnostic tests used and the populations studied. Thus, the precise analysis of the prevalence of PAD and the sensitivity and specificity of PAD diagnostic tests in this population remain to be determined. These analyses would help to optimise PAD diagnostic tools, while possibly providing an explanation for the post-operative persistence of functional discomfort in CLE patients. Furthermore, a better understanding of the vascular system in the CLE population offers hope for optimising patient care, both from a medical and a medico-economic point of view.

The experimental visit takes place as soon as possible after receipt of the biological assessment and within a maximum period of 3 months. During this visit, specific research examinations will be performed, including stress tests (stress TcPO2 according to the modified Strandness protocol and stress TcPO2 according to the Gardner-Skinner increasing load protocol), as well as an injected scan of the aorta of the lower limbs. The pseudonymised CT scan will be sent to the sponsor for blind review. A follow-up telephone call will be made between 7 and 10 days after the CT scan to detect the occurrence of any adverse events. The study will then be completed for the participant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Lille, France
        • Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marjolaine TALBOT
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France
        • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ewa Tuleja
      • Rennes, France

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting with a lumbar spinal stenosis with surgical indication, either unoperated or operated on less than 3 months ago
  • Affiliated with a social security scheme
  • Having received oral and written information about the protocol and having signed a written consent form to participate in this research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • emergency surgical care
  • Contraindication to contrast enhanced CT scan

    • Stroke or myocardial infarction (MI) within the last 3 months
    • Known severe or poorly tolerated arrhythmia
    • Known severe or symptomatic left ventricular outflow obstruction
    • Decompensated heart failure
    • History within the last 3 months of venous thromboembolic disease, myopericarditis, endocarditis, aortic dissection or intracardiac thrombus
    • Severe uncontrolled hypertension (BP > 200/110 mmHg)
    • Inability to walk on the treadmill
    • Major lower limb amputation
    • Adult subject to legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Participants
contrast-enhanced CT scan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with PAD identified during the contrast enhanced CT scan
Time Frame: 3 months
Number of patients with PAD identified during the contrast enhanced CT scan. PAD will be defined by the presence of at least one arterial stenosis ≥ 50% on the arterial axes located from the abdominal aorta to the origin of the tibiofibular arterial trunk, as determined by CT scan of the aorta and lower limbs in accordance with the recommendations.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficiency of diagnosis test "pulse"
Time Frame: 3 months
determination of the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the diagnostic test "pulse" : the absence of distal pulses will be considered pathological
3 months
Efficiency of diagnosis test "systolic pressure index"
Time Frame: 3 months
determination of the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the diagnostic test "systolic pressure index" : A resting systolic pressure index ≤ 0.90 will be considered pathological in accordance with the recommendations.
3 months
Efficiency of diagnosis test "toe systolic pressure index"
Time Frame: 3 months
determination of the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the diagnostic test "toe systolic pressure index" : A resting toe systolic pressure index ≤ 0.70 will be considered pathological in accordance with the recommendations.
3 months
Efficiency of diagnosis test "Aorto-iliac and lower limb Doppler ultrasound"
Time Frame: 3 months
determination of the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the diagnostic test "Aorto-iliac and lower limb Doppler ultrasound " : velocimetric criteria for stenosis and Saint-Bonnet B and CD, E and 0 Doppler curves considered pathological (i.e. AOMI) in accordance with recommendations .
3 months
Efficiency of diagnosis test "exercise oxymetry"
Time Frame: 3 months
determination of the sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the diagnostic test "exercise oxymetry " : Delta from rest oxygen pressure (DROP) ≤ -15 mmHg will be considered pathological (i.e. AOMI) in accordance with the recommendations. .
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Marjolaine Talbot, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 35R24_8825_04_CLE-PAD

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on contrast-enhanced CT scan

Subscribe