A Study of MM-121 in Combination With Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Heregulin Positive NSCLC (SHERLOC)

October 11, 2021 updated by: Elevation Oncology

SHERLOC: A Phase 2 Study of MM-121 in Combination With Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel Alone in Patients With Heregulin Positive, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Merrimack Pharmaceuticals Inc.)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the combination of MM-121 plus docetaxel is more effective than docetaxel alone in regards to PFS in patients with heregulin-positive NSCLC.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized, open-label, international, multi-center, phase 2 study in patients with Heregulin-positive NSCLC histologically classified as adenocarcinoma that have progressed following no more than two systemic therapies for locally advanced or metastatic disease, one of which must have been a platinum containing regimen. All patients will initially be screened for heregulin status. Eligible patients will be randomized to receive MM-121 in combination with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
    • Paris
      • Créteil, Paris, France, 94010
        • Chi Creteil
    • Rhône-Alpes
      • Lyon cedex 08, Rhône-Alpes, France, 69317
        • Centre Léon Bérard
      • Bad Berka, Germany, 99437
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60488
      • Oldenburg, Germany, 26121
    • Bayern
      • Munchen, Bayern, Germany, 80336
      • Budapest, Hungary, H-1121
      • Miskolc, Hungary, H-3529
      • Tatabanya, Hungary, H-2800
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
      • Malaga, Spain, 29010
      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, 08916
    • Madrid
      • Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, 28222
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85715
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
      • Santa Rosa, California, United States, 95403
    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
    • Indiana
      • Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47905
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
      • Danvers, Massachusetts, United States, 01923
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States, 22031
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of cytologically or histologically documented adenocarcinoma of the lung with either metastatic disease (stage IV), Stage IIIB or Stage IIIC disease not amenable to surgery with curative intent
  • Not received more than 2 prior systemic therapies- one of which must have been a platinum based regimen- for primary or recurrent disease
  • Tissue submitted for HRG-biomarker testing
  • ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known ALK mutation
  • Presence of exon 19 deletion or exon 21 (L858R) substitution of the EGFR gene
  • Received >2 prior systemic anti-cancer drug regimen for locally advanced disease
  • Prior treatment with an anti-ErbB3 antibody
  • CTCAE grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy
  • Symptomatic CNS metastases or CNS metastases requiring steroids
  • Any other active malignancy requiring systemic therapy
  • Clinically significant cardiac disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A: Experimental Arm
MM-121 in combination with Docetaxel
Investigational, fully human antibody targeting and inhibiting ErbB3
Other Names:
  • seribantumab
approved chemotherapy treatment for NSCLC
Other Names:
  • Taxotere
Active Comparator: Arm B: Comparator Arm
Docetaxel alone
approved chemotherapy treatment for NSCLC
Other Names:
  • Taxotere

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: Randomization until progression of disease or death due to any cause within 3 years,11 months (the study terminated prematurely)

Progression Free Survival is defined as the time from randomization to the first documented radiographical progression of disease using RECIST v.1.1, or death from any cause, whichever came first based on investigator assessment.

Patients that do not experience progression or death at the time of analysis were to be progression censored at the date of last valid tumor assessment. Progression-free survival time distribution and median survival for each treatment group were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor response was evaluated by the local radiologist according to RECIST version 1.1 to establish disease progression by CT or MRI.

Randomization until progression of disease or death due to any cause within 3 years,11 months (the study terminated prematurely)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed upto 3 years,11 months (the study terminated prematurely)
Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause
From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed upto 3 years,11 months (the study terminated prematurely)
Objective Response Rate
Time Frame: Randomization through end of study up to 3 years, 11 months (the study terminated prematurely)

Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of patients a best overall response characterised as either a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), as defined according to RECIST v1.1 guidelines, relative to the total number of evaluable patients.

Complete Response (CR) is defined as disappearance of all lesions and pathologic lymph nodes.

Partial Response (PR) is defined as >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions

Randomization through end of study up to 3 years, 11 months (the study terminated prematurely)
Time to Progression
Time Frame: Randomization to date of objective tumor progression up to 3 years, 11 months (the study terminated prematurely)
Time to Progression (TTP) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of objective tumor progression. In the actual analysis, duration of response (DOR) was analysed.
Randomization to date of objective tumor progression up to 3 years, 11 months (the study terminated prematurely)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Reported With the Combination of MM-121 With Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel Alone
Time Frame: TEAEs were collected through the study completion (02 Jan 2019), up to 3 years, 11 months
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as any event that occurred after the first dose of study drug and was not present prior to study drug administration or worsened in severity after study drug administration
TEAEs were collected through the study completion (02 Jan 2019), up to 3 years, 11 months
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters of MM-121 in Combination With Docetaxel and Docetaxel When Given in Combination With MM-121.
Time Frame: The study terminated prematurely after 3 years, 11 months (02 Jan 2019). PK evaluation were to be performed on samples obtained at Week 1 pre-dose and post-dose and at pre-dose at Cycle 2 and beyond to assess pre-treatment through concentrations of MM-121
Pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of MM-121 when given in combination with docetaxel, and of docetaxel when given in combination with MM-121. The maximum observed concentration (Cmax) were to be presented and calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Serum levels of MM-121 were to be measured at a central lab using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
The study terminated prematurely after 3 years, 11 months (02 Jan 2019). PK evaluation were to be performed on samples obtained at Week 1 pre-dose and post-dose and at pre-dose at Cycle 2 and beyond to assess pre-treatment through concentrations of MM-121
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events Reported With the Combination of MM-121 With Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel Alone
Time Frame: TEAEs were collected through the study completion (02 Jan 2019), up to 3 years, 11 months
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as any event that occurred after the first dose of study drug and was not present prior to study drug administration or worsened in severity after study drug administration
TEAEs were collected through the study completion (02 Jan 2019), up to 3 years, 11 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: MM-121 Program Medical Director, MD, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 12, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on MM-121

Subscribe